Since I started using 6 piece Syzygy tablebases a couple of days ago, I've come across two engines that lose with an illegal move message if the opponent takes a piece to leave a drawn 6 piece syzygy tablebase position.
Could you please check that your engine doesn't have this issue?
For engine authors
Moderator: Ras
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 46000
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
For engine authors
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 46000
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: For engine authors
Clover 3.3.1 is now fixed.
Uralochka 3.39d - still waiting for a fix.
Velvet 5.1.0 now loses on time without even reaching the tablebases stage. Author notified.
Uralochka 3.39d - still waiting for a fix.
Velvet 5.1.0 now loses on time without even reaching the tablebases stage. Author notified.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
Chessqueen
- Posts: 5685
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
- Location: Moving
- Full name: Jorge Picado
Re: For engine authors
My antivirus told me that Clover 3.3.1 contained a Trojan Horse before it downloaded and it prevented me from downloading itGraham Banks wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 4:36 am Clover 3.3.1 is now fixed.
Uralochka 3.39d - still waiting for a fix.
Velvet 5.1.0 now loses on time without even reaching the tablebases stage. Author notified.
-
RubiChess
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2018 7:20 am
- Full name: Andreas Matthies
Re: For engine authors
The search reaches tablebase probing using the wdl/.rtbw files long before the root position. On strong hardware like TCEC you see tablebase hits starting from the very first move in the game.Graham Banks wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 4:36 am Velvet 5.1.0 now loses on time without even reaching the tablebases stage. Author notified.
What kind of storage do you use for your tablebase files? Especially the .rtbw files should be on very fast storage like ssd. Using 6-men .rtbw on normal harddisk will slow down the engine and can lead to timeouts and/or worse play.
Regards, Andreas
-
Modern Times
- Posts: 3892
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm
Re: For engine authors
He has them on a normal hard drive. Not the best idea.
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 46000
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: For engine authors
I'll see if I can find an easy way to switch.Modern Times wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 7:15 am He has them on a normal hard drive. Not the best idea.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
RubiChess
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2018 7:20 am
- Full name: Andreas Matthies
Re: For engine authors
Or just stay at 5-men. Not the worst option in my opinion.
-
Chessqueen
- Posts: 5685
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
- Location: Moving
- Full name: Jorge Picado
Re: For engine authors
I believe that 5 men is more than sufficient, and let the two engines find out for themselves the best continuation of the endgame stage as a matter of fact are we trying to find out which of the two engines play all the stages of the game or simply let the EGTB find out the best and continuation in certain chess endgames
NOTE: As a matter fact, I do NOT even use EGTB at all for the same reason stated above. Do GMs use open chess book for their games such as Silman’s Complete Endgame Course chess knowledge? It should be the same for chess engines