tiger wrote:
And you will notice that, this time, I do not announce any number about the improvement.
// Christophe
of course ¡¡¡ that results are fantastic...
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404.live/
ok we have not enought time to long results, maybe books lines... maybe same hardware...
but it´s very evident that tiger 2007.1 is better that 2007.0 and a LOT OF better that tiger 15...
( I see that only read his analisys on time real... I hava a lot of olfaction to see "better games of engine"... )
I continue thinking that tiger likes a lot the "horses" in the end of the game, but I like a lot his game...
AND ONLY ONE CPU ¡¡¡ not is necesary that an engine occupies the a hundred for a hundred (100 % ) of the time the cpu, in long macht games the one limits in the middle game (20-25plys) in 3-5 minutes for move play it is enough for a ONE quick CPU...
in that list, tiger are 12... the 10 engines have 4 CPU ? and only up a little elo... ... not is a real better game on analisys help for human....
the other problem is the book of rybka, it´s very strong...
( sorry, edit: on other tournaments ... CT9 ? )
BUT the tiger this near close... very close... and from time to time (he/she) gives a bite...
PD: I´m do a test with position tacticals and tiger 2007 is more fast on plys that other engines smp....
and I hve only a "old" 820 D, 2,8 Ghz dual + 2048 RAM + Western digital raptor 10.000rmp...
in the most of time I runs cpu on 2,1 Ghz... to have down noise.... some test in 3,3 Ghz... but not is very importat to good analisys games...
maybe more options to "personalty" engine...
LONG LIVE TIGER ¡¡¡