Three Test Positions

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Terry McCracken

Re: Three Test Positions

Post by Terry McCracken »

Terry McCracken wrote:
Cubeman wrote:Terry wrote I've noticed the last two diagrams haven't any computer analysis, well it's nice to know we humans are smarter than these dumb machines.
But Terry your analysis of the second position claiming that Nxe6 is the best move and plan to follow up Qe5 with Rf6!! does not lead to a clear win like 1 Nd5!!.After your suggested 1 Nxe6 Qe5,2 Rf6 Bxf6,3 gxf6 Qxf6, what is your best plan.My dumb computer says 4 Nxf8 Qg7,5 Qxg7+ Kxg7,6 axb3 Nxf8,7 Nb5 Bd7,8 Nxd6 with a small + for White of 0.99.
This pawn advantage is so insignificant with the opposite bishop minor piece endgame.So maybe the computer is dumb.
Whereas the 1 Nd5!! leads to a huge +4.50 for White.
Did I overlook Nd5? How fallible of me.

I only looked at the positions briefly, I'll take another look.
I took another look. Indeed, Nd5!! is best with a crushing mating attack!

My Nxe6?! wasn't the best but it's a follow-up move!

1.Nd5 exd5 2.Ne6 fxe6 3.Qxg6+ Kh8 4.Qh5+ Kg8 5.g6

The point of Nd5!! is clear, it cuts of lines of communication, so no Qe5 is possible, leaving the Black King defenceless. Brilliant play!

Terry
Top
Marc MP

Re: Three Test Positions

Post by Marc MP »

Terry McCracken wrote:
Terry McCracken wrote:
Cubeman wrote:Terry wrote I've noticed the last two diagrams haven't any computer analysis, well it's nice to know we humans are smarter than these dumb machines.
But Terry your analysis of the second position claiming that Nxe6 is the best move and plan to follow up Qe5 with Rf6!! does not lead to a clear win like 1 Nd5!!.After your suggested 1 Nxe6 Qe5,2 Rf6 Bxf6,3 gxf6 Qxf6, what is your best plan.My dumb computer says 4 Nxf8 Qg7,5 Qxg7+ Kxg7,6 axb3 Nxf8,7 Nb5 Bd7,8 Nxd6 with a small + for White of 0.99.
This pawn advantage is so insignificant with the opposite bishop minor piece endgame.So maybe the computer is dumb.
Whereas the 1 Nd5!! leads to a huge +4.50 for White.
Did I overlook Nd5? How fallible of me.

I only looked at the positions briefly, I'll take another look.
I took another look. Indeed, Nd5!! is best with a crushing mating attack!

My Nxe6?! wasn't the best but it's a follow-up move!

1.Nd5 exd5 2.Ne6 fxe6 3.Qxg6+ Kh8 4.Qh5+ Kg8 5.g6

The point of Nd5!! is clear, it cuts of lines of communication, so no Qe5 is possible, leaving the Black King defenceless. Brilliant play!

Terry
Too bad your Ne6 line doesn't work because it is quite spectacular (in terms of hangning pieces!) after Qe5 Rf6! Quick analysis by SlowChess 2.1:

SlowChess Blitz WV2.1 (94 MB hash)
FEN: r1b2rk1/1p1nbp2/p2pp1pQ/q5P1/3NP3/1nN1B3/PPP4P/R4RK1 w - -

[13] 3.84 01:10.9 Nd5 Qxd5 exd5 Nxd4 Bxd4 e5 Rae1 Bxg5 Qxg5 exd4 Rd1 Ne5 Rxd4
[12] 3.52 00:27.0 Nd5 exd5 Ne6 fxe6 Qxg6+ Kh8 Qh6+ Kg8 Qxe6+ Kh8 Qh6+ Kg8 g6 Rxf1+ Rxf1 Nf6 Rxf6 Qe1+ Rf1 Qxf1+ Kxf1 Nd2+ Bxd2 dxe4
[11] 2.60 00:11.0 Nd5 exd5 Ne6 fxe6 Qxg6+ Kh8 Qh6+ Kg8 g6 Rxf1+ Rxf1 Nf6 Rxf6 Qe1+ Rf1 Qh4 Rf8+ Bxf8 Qxh4 Bg7 axb3 dxe4 Qd8+ Bf8
[10] 2.32 00:05.1 Nd5 exd5 Ne6 fxe6 Qxg6+ Kh8 Qh6+ Kg8 g6 Rxf1+ Rxf1 Nf6 Rxf6 Qe1+ Rf1 Qh4 Rf8+ Bxf8 Qxh4 Kg7 axb3 Kxg6 exd5 exd5
[9] 0.41 00:02.0 Nd5 exd5 Ne6 fxe6 Qxg6+ Kh8 Qh6+ Kg8 Qg6+ <draw>
[8] 0.41 00:00.8 Nd5 exd5 Ne6 fxe6 Qxg6+ Kh8 Qh6+ Kg8 Qg6+ <draw>
[7] 0.41 00:00.3 Nd5 exd5 Ne6 fxe6 Qxg6+ Kh8 Qh6+ Kg8 Qg6+ <draw>
[6] 0.40 00:00.2 Nd5 Bxg5 Qxg5 exd5 axb3 Qc5 exd5
[6] 0.00 00:00.1 Nd5 {++}
[6] 0.00 00:00.0 axb3 Qe5 Nf3 Qg7 Qxg7+ Kxg7 Bd4+ f6 gxf6+ Nxf6
[5] 0.00 00:00.0 axb3 Qe5 Nf3 Qg7 Qxg7+ Kxg7 Bd4+ f6 gxf6+ Nxf6
[4] -0.08 00:00.0 axb3 Qc7 Ndb5 Qc6
[3] -0.08 00:00.0 axb3 Qe5 b4
[2] -0.08 00:00.0 axb3 Qe5
Top
Terry McCracken

Re: Three Test Positions

Post by Terry McCracken »

Marc MP wrote:
Terry McCracken wrote:
Terry McCracken wrote:
Cubeman wrote:Terry wrote I've noticed the last two diagrams haven't any computer analysis, well it's nice to know we humans are smarter than these dumb machines.
But Terry your analysis of the second position claiming that Nxe6 is the best move and plan to follow up Qe5 with Rf6!! does not lead to a clear win like 1 Nd5!!.After your suggested 1 Nxe6 Qe5,2 Rf6 Bxf6,3 gxf6 Qxf6, what is your best plan.My dumb computer says 4 Nxf8 Qg7,5 Qxg7+ Kxg7,6 axb3 Nxf8,7 Nb5 Bd7,8 Nxd6 with a small + for White of 0.99.
This pawn advantage is so insignificant with the opposite bishop minor piece endgame.So maybe the computer is dumb.
Whereas the 1 Nd5!! leads to a huge +4.50 for White.
Did I overlook Nd5? How fallible of me.

I only looked at the positions briefly, I'll take another look.
I took another look. Indeed, Nd5!! is best with a crushing mating attack!

My Nxe6?! wasn't the best but it's a follow-up move!

1.Nd5 exd5 2.Ne6 fxe6 3.Qxg6+ Kh8 4.Qh5+ Kg8 5.g6

The point of Nd5!! is clear, it cuts of lines of communication, so no Qe5 is possible, leaving the Black King defenceless. Brilliant play!

Terry
Too bad your Ne6 line doesn't work because it is quite spectacular (in terms of hangning pieces!) after Qe5 Rf6! Quick analysis by SlowChess 2.1:

SlowChess Blitz WV2.1 (94 MB hash)
FEN: r1b2rk1/1p1nbp2/p2pp1pQ/q5P1/3NP3/1nN1B3/PPP4P/R4RK1 w - -

[13] 3.84 01:10.9 Nd5 Qxd5 exd5 Nxd4 Bxd4 e5 Rae1 Bxg5 Qxg5 exd4 Rd1 Ne5 Rxd4
[12] 3.52 00:27.0 Nd5 exd5 Ne6 fxe6 Qxg6+ Kh8 Qh6+ Kg8 Qxe6+ Kh8 Qh6+ Kg8 g6 Rxf1+ Rxf1 Nf6 Rxf6 Qe1+ Rf1 Qxf1+ Kxf1 Nd2+ Bxd2 dxe4
[11] 2.60 00:11.0 Nd5 exd5 Ne6 fxe6 Qxg6+ Kh8 Qh6+ Kg8 g6 Rxf1+ Rxf1 Nf6 Rxf6 Qe1+ Rf1 Qh4 Rf8+ Bxf8 Qxh4 Bg7 axb3 dxe4 Qd8+ Bf8
[10] 2.32 00:05.1 Nd5 exd5 Ne6 fxe6 Qxg6+ Kh8 Qh6+ Kg8 g6 Rxf1+ Rxf1 Nf6 Rxf6 Qe1+ Rf1 Qh4 Rf8+ Bxf8 Qxh4 Kg7 axb3 Kxg6 exd5 exd5
[9] 0.41 00:02.0 Nd5 exd5 Ne6 fxe6 Qxg6+ Kh8 Qh6+ Kg8 Qg6+ <draw>
[8] 0.41 00:00.8 Nd5 exd5 Ne6 fxe6 Qxg6+ Kh8 Qh6+ Kg8 Qg6+ <draw>
[7] 0.41 00:00.3 Nd5 exd5 Ne6 fxe6 Qxg6+ Kh8 Qh6+ Kg8 Qg6+ <draw>
[6] 0.40 00:00.2 Nd5 Bxg5 Qxg5 exd5 axb3 Qc5 exd5
[6] 0.00 00:00.1 Nd5 {++}
[6] 0.00 00:00.0 axb3 Qe5 Nf3 Qg7 Qxg7+ Kxg7 Bd4+ f6 gxf6+ Nxf6
[5] 0.00 00:00.0 axb3 Qe5 Nf3 Qg7 Qxg7+ Kxg7 Bd4+ f6 gxf6+ Nxf6
[4] -0.08 00:00.0 axb3 Qc7 Ndb5 Qc6
[3] -0.08 00:00.0 axb3 Qe5 b4
[2] -0.08 00:00.0 axb3 Qe5
Yes, I liked Nxe6 very much as the first move but didn't analize it with any depth, still, Nd5!! is nice and Ne6 is next so it's very similar, but for aesthetics, indeed Nxe6 wins, but beauty is only a few plies deep in this case :wink:

Terry
Top
Dann Corbit
Posts: 12574
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:57 pm
Location: Redmond, WA USA

Re: Three Test Positions

Post by Dann Corbit »

Code: Select all


Analysis from e&#58;\3.epd   
5/2/2007 6&#58;23&#58;57 PM Level&#58; 7200 Seconds
Analyzing engine&#58; Rybka v1.2.w32

1&#41; "Chiyanovsky-Gufeld  
    Avoid move&#58; 
    Best move &#40;Rybka v1.2.w32&#41;&#58; Nd7xe5
    Not found in&#58; 2&#58;00&#58;00
      2	00&#58;01	         184	1.495	-0.27	Nd7c5
      3	00&#58;01	         552	3.980	-0.19	Nd7c5
      4	00&#58;01	       1.632	7.081	-0.39	Nd7c5 Bc1e3
      5	00&#58;01	       2.416	9.856	-0.41	Nd7c5 Bc1e3 Nc5b3
      5	00&#58;01	       4.096	12.748	-0.39	Nd7b6 00 Nb6c4
      6	00&#58;01	       8.048	21.023	-0.39	Nd7b6 Bc1e3 Nb6c4 Qd6c5
      6	00&#58;02	      11.480	21.451	-0.19	Nd7xe5 f4xe5 Bg7xe5 Qd6d3 Ra8d8 Qd3f3
      7	00&#58;02	      16.048	25.596	-0.23	Nd7xe5 f4xe5 Bg7xe5 Qd6d3 Ra8d8 Qd3f3 Qa5b6
      8	00&#58;02	      25.408	32.603	-0.30	Nd7xe5 f4xe5 Bg7xe5 Qd6d3 Ra8d8 Qd3f3 Qa5b6 Ke1f1
      9	00&#58;02	      49.320	43.612	-0.29	Nd7xe5 f4xe5 Bg7xe5 Qd6d3 Ra8d8 Qd3f3 Be5d4 g2g3 Qa5a6
     10	00&#58;03	      85.168	50.704	+0.01	Nd7xe5 f4xe5 Bg7xe5 Qd6d3 Ra8d8 Qd3f3 Be5d4 g2g3 Rf8e8+ Ke1f1 Bd4xc3
     11	00&#58;03	     139.448	57.439	+0.01	Nd7xe5 f4xe5 Bg7xe5 Qd6d3 Ra8d8 Qd3f3 Be5d4 g2g3 Rf8e8+ Ke1f1 Bd4xc3 b2xc3 Qa5a6+ Kf1g2
     12	00&#58;05	     247.352	65.079	+0.06	Nd7xe5 f4xe5 Bg7xe5 Qd6d3 Ra8d8 Qd3f3 Be5d4 g2g3 Rf8e8+ Ke1f1 Bd4xc3 b2xc3 Qa5a6+ Kf1g2
     13	00&#58;08	     474.568	67.748	+0.10	Nd7xe5 f4xe5 Bg7xe5 Qd6d3 Ra8d8 Qd3f3 Be5d4 a2a4 Rf8e8+ Ke1f1 Bd4xc3 b2xc3 Qa5a6+ Kf1f2
     14	00&#58;15	     960.864	69.270	+0.19	Nd7xe5 f4xe5 Bg7xe5 Qd6d3 Ra8d8 Qd3f3 Be5d4 Ke1f1 Qa5a6+ Nc3e2 Rf8e8 Bc1g5 Rd8d5 Bg5f4
     15	00&#58;29	   1.774.816	64.330	+0.27	Nd7xe5 f4xe5 Bg7xe5 Qd6d3 Ra8d8 Qd3f3 Be5d4 Ke1f1 Qa5a6+ Nc3e2 Rf8e8 Bc1h6 Bd4xb2 Ra1e1
     16	01&#58;03	   4.982.144	82.138	+0.77	Nd7xe5 f4xe5 Bg7xe5 Qd6d3 Ra8d8 Qd3f3 Be5d4 Ke1f1 Qa5a6+ Nc3e2 Rf8e8 Bc1f4 Bd4xb2 Ra1e1
     17	01&#58;39	   8.197.200	85.815	+0.83	Nd7xe5 f4xe5 Bg7xe5 Qd6d3 Ra8d8 Qd3f3 Be5d4 Ke1f1 Qa5a6+ Nc3e2 Rf8e8 a2a3 Rd8c8 Bc1d2
     18	02&#58;44	  14.225.120	89.596	+0.91	Nd7xe5 f4xe5 Bg7xe5 Qd6d3 Ra8d8 Qd3f3 Be5d4 Ke1f1 Qa5a6+ Nc3e2 Rf8e8 Bc1f4 Bd4xb2 Ra1b1
     19	07&#58;23	  38.426.840	89.034	+0.96	Nd7xe5 Qd6d5 Qa5xd5 Nc3xd5 Ne5d3+ Ke1e2 Rf8e8+ Ke2xd3 Ra8d8 Kd3c4 Re8e4+ Kc4b3 Rd8xd5 g2g4
     20	09&#58;47	  51.950.024	90.851	+1.05	Nd7xe5 Qd6d5 Qa5xd5 Nc3xd5 Ne5d3+ Ke1e2 Rf8e8+ Ke2xd3 Ra8d8 Kd3c4 Re8e4+ Kc4b3 Rd8xd5 g2g4
     21	14&#58;34	  77.636.064	91.090	+1.03	Nd7xe5 Qd6d5 Qa5xd5 Nc3xd5 Ne5d3+ Ke1e2 Rf8e8+ Ke2xd3 Ra8d8 Kd3c4 Re8e4+ Kc4b3 Rd8xd5 g2g4
     22	23&#58;40	 127.755.432	92.193	+1.06	Nd7xe5 Qd6d5 Qa5xd5 Nc3xd5 Ne5d3+ Ke1e2 Rf8e8+ Ke2xd3 Ra8d8 Kd3c4 Re8e4+ Kc4b3 Rd8xd5 g2g4
     23	42&#58;37	 226.726.952	90.844	+1.06	Nd7xe5 Qd6d5 Qa5xd5 Nc3xd5 Ne5d3+ Ke1e2 Rf8e8+ Ke2xd3 Ra8d8 Kd3c4 Re8e4+ Kc4b3 Rd8xd5 g2g4
     24	1&#58;22&#58;28	 436.068.616	90.259	+1.03	Nd7xe5 Qd6d5 Qa5xd5 Nc3xd5 Ne5d3+ Ke1e2 Rf8e8+ Ke2xd3 Ra8d8 Kd3c4 Re8e4+ Kc4b3 Rd8xd5 g2g4
   5/2/2007 8&#58;24&#58;13 PM, Time for this analysis&#58; 02&#58;00&#58;02, Rated time&#58; 2&#58;00&#58;00

2&#41; "Krason-Gromek &#40;Pols 
    Avoid move&#58; 
    Best move &#40;Rybka v1.2.w32&#41;&#58; Nc3-d5
    Not found in&#58; 2&#58;00&#58;00
      2	00&#58;01	         144	4.468	+0.44	a2xb3
      3	00&#58;01	         320	9.929	+0.44	a2xb3
      4	00&#58;01	         872	18.602	+0.45	a2xb3 Qa5e5
      5	00&#58;01	       2.672	24.649	+0.53	a2xb3 Qa5e5 Qh6h4
      6	00&#58;01	       6.816	36.929	+0.44	a2xb3 Qa5e5 Kg1g2 Nd7c5
      7	00&#58;01	      13.144	45.165	+0.36	a2xb3 Qa5e5 Kg1g2 Nd7c5 Nd4f3
      8	00&#58;01	      29.920	52.824	+0.36	a2xb3 Qa5e5 Rf1d1 a6a5 Kg1g2 Ra8a6
      9	00&#58;02	      59.808	58.438	+0.38	a2xb3 Qa5e5 Qh6h4 Qe5g7 Nc3b5 e6e5 Nd4f3
     10	00&#58;04	     199.528	60.790	+0.31	a2xb3 Qa5e5 Nd4f3 Qe5g7 Kg1g2 f7f6 Qh6h3 f6f5
     11	00&#58;06	     316.096	63.529	+0.31	a2xb3 Qa5e5 Nd4f3 Qe5g7 Kg1g2 f7f6 Qh6h3 f6f5 e4xf5
     12	00&#58;10	     629.288	70.248	+0.34	a2xb3 Qa5e5 Rf1d1 Ra8b8 Nd4f3 Qe5g7 Be3f4 e6e5 Nc3d5 Be7d8
     13	00&#58;16	   1.070.400	72.016	+0.35	a2xb3 Qa5e5 Rf1d1 a6a5 Kg1g2 Ra8a6 Nd4f3 Qe5g7 Nc3b5 Qg7xh6 g5xh6 Nd7f6
     14	00&#58;27	   1.907.288	73.870	+0.35	a2xb3 Qa5e5 Rf1d1 a6a5 Kg1g2 Ra8a6 Nd4f3 Qe5g7 Nc3b5 Qg7xh6 g5xh6 Nd7f6 Be3g5
     15	00&#58;50	   3.583.576	74.744	+0.32	a2xb3 Qa5e5 Rf1d1 a6a5 Kg1g2 Ra8a6 Nd4f3 Qe5g7 Nc3b5 Nd7c5 Qh6xg7+ Kg8xg7 Be3d4+ Kg7h7
     16	01&#58;38	   7.299.272	76.770	+0.38	a2xb3 Qa5e5 Rf1d1 Ra8b8 Nd4f3 Qe5g7 Be3f4 e6e5 Nc3d5 Be7d8 Bf4e3 Qg7xh6 g5xh6 f7f5
     17	02&#58;55	  13.226.808	77.436	+0.36	a2xb3 Qa5e5 Rf1d1 Ra8b8 Nd4f3 Qe5g7 Be3f4 e6e5 Nc3d5 Be7d8 Bf4e3 Qg7xh6 g5xh6 f7f5
     17	04&#58;16	  20.169.952	80.777	+1.22	Nc3d5 e6xd5 a2xb3 Qa5xa1 Rf1xa1 Nd7e5 e4xd5 Bc8d7 Be3f4 Be7d8 Bf4xe5 d6xe5 Nd4e2 Bd7g4
     18	08&#58;28	  47.701.144	96.339	+2.07	Nc3d5 Qa5xd5 e4xd5 Nb3xd4 Be3xd4 e6e5 Ra1e1 Be7xg5 Qh6xg5 e5xd4 Re1e4 Kg8g7 Re4h4 f7f5
     19	10&#58;06	  55.930.344	94.631	+2.17	Nc3d5 Qa5xd5 e4xd5 Nb3xd4 Be3xd4 e6e5 Ra1e1 Be7xg5 Qh6xg5 e5xd4 Re1e4 Kg8g7 Re4h4 f7f5
     20	22&#58;03	 144.925.480	112.213	+2.95	Nc3d5 e6xd5 Nd4e6 f7xe6 Qh6xg6+ Kg8h8 a2xb3 Qa5xa1 Qg6h6+ Kh8g8 Qh6xe6+ Kg8h8 Rf1xa1 Be7xg5
     21	34&#58;09	 212.549.096	106.247	+3.23	Nc3d5 e6xd5 Nd4e6 f7xe6 Qh6xg6+ Kg8h8 a2xb3 Qa5xa1 Qg6h6+ Kh8g8 Qh6xe6+ Kg8h8 Rf1xa1 Be7xg5
     22	1&#58;01&#58;33	 364.627.000	101.126	+3.36	Nc3d5 Qa5xd5 e4xd5 Nb3xd4 Be3xd4 e6e5 Ra1e1 Be7xg5 Qh6xg5 e5xd4 Rf1f4 Nd7e5 Re1xe5 d6xe5
     23	1&#58;30&#58;18	 536.371.224	101.382	+3.71	Nc3d5 Qa5xd5 e4xd5 Nb3xd4 Be3xd4 e6e5 Ra1e1 Be7xg5 Qh6xg5 e5xd4 Rf1f4 Nd7e5 Re1xe5 d6xe5
   5/2/2007 10&#58;24&#58;16 PM, Time for this analysis&#58; 02&#58;00&#58;02, Rated time&#58; 4&#58;00&#58;00

3&#41; "Lasker-Pirc &#40;Moscow 
    Avoid move&#58; 
    Best move &#40;Rybka v1.2.w32&#41;&#58; Rf1xf6
    Not found in&#58; 2&#58;00&#58;00
      2	00&#58;01	         320	327.680	+0.75	Qd1f3
      3	00&#58;01	         568	581.632	+0.65	Qd1f3
      3	00&#58;01	         696	712.704	+0.71	Qd1d2
      4	00&#58;01	       2.048	65.536	+0.53	Qd1d2 Qc4b4
      4	00&#58;01	       3.704	79.018	+0.63	Qd1e1 Bc8d7
      5	00&#58;01	       5.488	71.135	+0.52	Qd1e1 Bc8d7 Qe1d2
      5	00&#58;01	       7.768	63.130	+0.53	Qd1d2 e6e5 b2b3
      6	00&#58;01	      12.624	74.722	+0.61	Qd1d2 Bc8d7 b2b3 Qc4c7
      7	00&#58;01	      30.616	80.181	+0.17	Qd1d2 Bf8e7 b2b3 Qc4c7 Rf1f3
      7	00&#58;01	      56.896	77.578	+0.25	Qd1f3 Bf8e7 Nc3e2 Bc8d7 b2b3
      8	00&#58;02	     114.280	73.368	+0.25	Qd1f3 Bf8e7 Nc3e2 Bc8d7 b2b3 Qc4c8
      9	00&#58;03	     148.480	76.596	+0.11	Qd1f3 Bf8e7 Nc3e2 Bc8d7 b2b3 Qc4c8 Qf3g3
      9	00&#58;03	     167.368	77.200	+0.11	Qd1d2 Bf8e7 b2b3 Qc4c7 Rf1f3 00 Ra1f1
     10	00&#58;06	     369.376	76.104	+0.11	Qd1d2 Bf8e7 b2b3 Qc4c7 Rf1f3 00 Ra1f1 Bc8d7
     10	00&#58;07	     470.376	71.676	+0.60	Rf1xf6 g7xf6 Qd1h5+ Ke8d8 Qh5f7 Bf8e7 Nd4f5 Qc4c7 Nf5g7 Qc7a5
     11	00&#58;08	     529.936	70.155	+0.61	Rf1xf6 g7xf6 Qd1h5+ Ke8d8 Qh5f7 Bf8e7 Nd4f5 Qc4c7 Nf5g7 Rh8f8 Ng7xe6+ Bc8xe6 Qf7xe6 Qc7d7
     12	00&#58;10	     671.704	71.685	+0.63	Rf1xf6 g7xf6 Qd1h5+ Ke8d8 Qh5f7 Bf8e7 Nd4f5 Qc4c7 Nf5g7 Qc7a5 Ng7xe6+ Bc8xe6 Qf7xe6 Qa5e5
     13	00&#58;15	   1.000.720	71.048	+1.66	Rf1xf6 g7xf6 Qd1h5+ Ke8d8 Qh5f7 Bf8e7 Nd4f5 Qc4c7 Nc3a4 Rh8f8 Qf7xh7 e6xf5 Be3b6
     14	00&#58;18	   1.212.768	70.899	+1.54	Rf1xf6 g7xf6 Qd1h5+ Ke8d8 Qh5f7 Bf8e7 Nd4f5 Qc4c7 Nc3a4 Rh8f8 Qf7xh7 e6xf5 Be3b6 Rf8e8
     15	00&#58;24	   1.681.576	72.310	+1.70	Rf1xf6 g7xf6 Qd1h5+ Ke8d8 Qh5f7 Bf8e7 Nd4f5 Qc4c7 Nc3a4 Rh8f8 Qf7xh7 e6xf5 Be3b6 Rf8e8
     16	00&#58;41	   2.856.808	72.877	+1.76	Rf1xf6 g7xf6 Qd1h5+ Ke8d8 Qh5f7 Bc8d7 Qf7xf6+ Kd8c7 Qf6xh8 Bf8h6 Nd4xe6+ Qc4xe6 Qh8xa8 Bh6xe3+
     17	01&#58;08	   4.850.456	74.253	+1.76	Rf1xf6 g7xf6 Qd1h5+ Ke8d8 Qh5f7 Bc8d7 Qf7xf6+ Kd8c7 Qf6xh8 Bf8h6 Nd4xe6+ Qc4xe6 Qh8xa8 Bh6xe3+
     18	02&#58;08	   9.324.592	75.257	+1.76	Rf1xf6 g7xf6 Qd1h5+ Ke8d8 Qh5f7 Bc8d7 Qf7xf6+ Kd8c7 Qf6xh8 Bf8h6 Nd4xe6+ Qc4xe6 Qh8xa8 Bh6xe3+
     19	03&#58;50	  17.306.224	77.302	+1.92	Rf1xf6 g7xf6 Qd1h5+ Ke8d8 Qh5f7 Bc8d7 Qf7xf6+ Kd8c7 Qf6xh8 Bf8h6 Nd4xe6+ Qc4xe6 Qh8xa8 Bh6xe3+
     20	07&#58;44	  35.204.232	77.780	+1.93	Rf1xf6 g7xf6 Qd1h5+ Ke8d8 Qh5f7 Bc8d7 Ra1d1 Ra8c8 Qf7xf6+ Kd8c7 b2b3 Qc4b4 Be3d2 Bf8e7
     21	14&#58;18	  65.480.672	78.209	+2.05	Rf1xf6 g7xf6 Qd1h5+ Ke8d8 Qh5f7 Bc8d7 Ra1d1 Ra8c8 Qf7xf6+ Kd8c7 b2b3 Qc4b4 Be3d2 Bf8e7
     22	26&#58;21	 119.314.192	77.295	+2.05	Rf1xf6 g7xf6 Qd1h5+ Ke8d8 Qh5f7 Bc8d7 Ra1d1 Ra8c8 Qf7xf6+ Kd8c7 b2b3 Qc4b4 Be3d2 Bf8e7
     23	56&#58;05	 258.323.848	78.634	+2.04	Rf1xf6 g7xf6 Qd1h5+ Ke8d8 Qh5f7 Bf8e7 Nd4f5 Qc4c7 Nc3a4 Rh8f8 Qf7xh7 e6xf5 Be3b6 Rf8e8
     24	1&#58;35&#58;23	 436.359.896	78.090	+2.04	Rf1xf6 g7xf6 Qd1h5+ Ke8d8 Qh5f7 Bf8e7 Nd4f5 Qc4c7 Nc3a4 Rh8f8 Qf7xh7 e6xf5 Be3b6 Rf8e8
   5/3/2007 12&#58;24&#58;21 AM, Time for this analysis&#58; 02&#58;00&#58;03, Rated time&#58; 6&#58;00&#58;00

0 of 3 matching moves
5/3/2007 12&#58;24&#58;22 AM, Total time&#58; 6&#58;00&#58;25 AM
Rated time&#58; 6&#58;00&#58;00 = 21600 Seconds
Top

Return to “Computer Chess Club: General Topics”