Three chess rules which i can't understand . so need help.
Moderator: Ras
-
Dr.Wael Deeb
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Three chess rules which i can't understand . so need he
I think the whole thread is a waste of time,the rules are there and we can't change them,the rest is empty words or another variation of the classical chess game 
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
smirobth
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:41 pm
- Location: Brownsville Texas USA
Re: Three chess rules which i can't understand . so need he
I doubt that the ep rule was defined as it is for reasons related to the endgame. Rather I think it is in order to make creation of locked (closed) pawn structures more difficult without acquiescence of both players.Mike S. wrote:The sense of the doublestep, or 2-squares-move of the pawns is to speed up the opening. But we don't want that a passed pawn can be created by that:ChessMate wrote:2. Why pieces other than pawns can't capture the 2 squares moved pawn by moving into the first square . ?
(en passant).
8/8/8/8/p7/8/1P1k4/1K6 w - - 0 1
Without e.p. rule, White could win with 1.b4 passing Black's a4 pawn, but that is not the purpose of the 2 squares-rule for the first pawn move. So, 1...axb3 would capture en passant here, 2.Kb2 draw.
- Robin Smith
-
Terry McCracken
Re: Three chess rules which i can't understand . so need he
You may be correct Robin, but I feel it was created for many reasons, and I agree with those reasons.smirobth wrote:I doubt that the ep rule was defined as it is for reasons related to the endgame. Rather I think it is in order to make creation of locked (closed) pawn structures more difficult without acquiescence of both players.Mike S. wrote:The sense of the doublestep, or 2-squares-move of the pawns is to speed up the opening. But we don't want that a passed pawn can be created by that:ChessMate wrote:2. Why pieces other than pawns can't capture the 2 squares moved pawn by moving into the first square . ?
(en passant).
8/8/8/8/p7/8/1P1k4/1K6 w - - 0 1
Without e.p. rule, White could win with 1.b4 passing Black's a4 pawn, but that is not the purpose of the 2 squares-rule for the first pawn move. So, 1...axb3 would capture en passant here, 2.Kb2 draw.
Best,
Terry
P.S. I agree with the good doctor, this thread is probably just wasting space. Murat probably gave the best answer or at least the most amusing answer
-
Mike S.
- Posts: 1480
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:33 am
Re: Three chess rules which i can't understand . so need he
I didn't claim that, I only set up a simple position to illustrate how a passed pawn could be created by a pawn's first move, without e.p. rule - As for the reasons, see my quote from the Oxford companion above. I think that is a reference work which can be trusted.smirobth wrote: I doubt that the ep rule was defined as it is for reasons related to the endgame.
Regards, Mike
-
ozziejoe
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:07 pm
Re: Three chess rules which i can't understand . so need he
playing street chess in californnia, i discovered that on the street you are allowed to move your king into check, and are allowed to make a move other than getting your king out of check. I did not know this rule and did not know my king was in check, moved another piece, and the guy playing me announced "oh, that was a weak move" loudly so everybody else could hear and then took my king. I am still traumatized (especially since the game was dead even)
Alas, now that I have got that off my chest, I can return someday to the streets of california......and kill that man.
best
Joseph
Alas, now that I have got that off my chest, I can return someday to the streets of california......and kill that man.
best
Joseph
-
Terry McCracken
Re: Three chess rules which i can't understand . so need he
ozziejoe wrote:playing street chess in californnia, i discovered that on the street you are allowed to move your king into check, and are allowed to make a move other than getting your king out of check. I did not know this rule and did not know my king was in check, moved another piece, and the guy playing me announced "oh, that was a weak move" loudly so everybody else could hear and then took my king. I am still traumatized (especially since the game was dead even)
Alas, now that I have got that off my chest, I can return someday to the streets of california......and kill that man.
best
Joseph
I remember playing lots of speed games both with friends and on the streets. Often the rules flew off the board along with the pieces!
King Chop Regards,
Terry
-
smirobth
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:41 pm
- Location: Brownsville Texas USA
Re: Three chess rules which i can't understand . so need he
I believe the primary reason for the ep rule is to avoid locked pawns, not passed pawns.Mike S. wrote:I didn't claim that, I only set up a simple position to illustrate how a passed pawn could be created by a pawn's first move, without e.p. rule - As for the reasons, see my quote from the Oxford companion above. I think that is a reference work which can be trusted.smirobth wrote: I doubt that the ep rule was defined as it is for reasons related to the endgame.
- Robin Smith