Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.
Moderator: Ras
Graham Banks
Posts: 44583Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 amLocation: Auckland, NZ
Post by Graham Banks Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:48 am
nthom wrote: Graham Banks wrote:
It would be nice to get an acknowledgement from some other engine authors that they do likewise (apart from the ones who've already let me know).
I like watching LittleThought lose every tournament
no really.
Yeah - I know you follow the tourneys Nathan.
Keep up the good work with your engine.
In the absence of any decent NZ engines, I regret to say I must support the Aussies!
Graham Banks
Posts: 44583Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 amLocation: Auckland, NZ
Post by Graham Banks Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:43 am
THE SPANISH INQUISITION Standings after Round 10 7.0 - NanoSzachy 2.9
swami
Posts: 6662Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am
Post by swami Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:46 am
BugChess is improving it seems.
Graham Banks
Posts: 44583Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 amLocation: Auckland, NZ
Post by Graham Banks Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:53 am
swami wrote: BugChess is improving it seems.
Indeed!
The new NanoSzachy continues to impress!
swami
Posts: 6662Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am
Post by swami Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:08 am
Graham Banks wrote: swami wrote: BugChess is improving it seems.
Indeed!
The new NanoSzachy continues to impress!
Yes but I bet either Twisted Logic or Bugchess would go ahead of Nanoszachy in the end.
Graham Banks
Posts: 44583Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 amLocation: Auckland, NZ
Post by Graham Banks Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:09 am
swami wrote: Graham Banks wrote: swami wrote: BugChess is improving it seems.
Indeed!
The new NanoSzachy continues to impress!
Yes but I bet either Twisted Logic or Bugchess would go ahead of Nanoszachy in the end.
I voted for Twisted Logic to win, so I must say I agree!
Graham Banks
Posts: 44583Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 amLocation: Auckland, NZ
Post by Graham Banks Mon Aug 13, 2007 7:36 am
Little Thought 1.01 has replaced Little Thought 1.00.
Hamsters 0.4 has replaced Hamsters 0.3.
THE SPANISH INQUISITION
Dual Athlon XP1800+
Arena 1.1 GUI
128mb hash each
3-4-5 piece tablebases
Ponder off
Salvo's 8moves.abk book
40 moves in 75 minutes repeating (adapted for the CCRL)
2 cycles (30 rounds)
Standings after Round 15 11.0 - BugChess2 1.5.1
11.0 - Hamsters 0.4
10.5 - Twisted Logic 0.099x
8.5 - NanoSzachy 2.9
8.0 - Tytan 9.32
7.5 - Hermann 2.0
7.5 - Delphil 1.8
7.0 - GreKo 5.4
7.0 - DanaSah 3.13
7.0 - Alfil 7.6
7.0 - Typhoon 1.00-314
6.5 - Popochin 3.0
6.0 - BBChess 1.10
6.0 - Natwarlal 0.14
5.0 - Little Thought 1.01
4.5 - Zeus 1.29
swami
Posts: 6662Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am
Post by swami Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:32 am
Bugchess is doing better in later stage, I guess Francois was right, and Hamsters is doing even better, Alessandro must be proud!
Uri Blass
Posts: 10888Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 amLocation: Tel-Aviv Israel
Post by Uri Blass Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:09 pm
swami wrote: Bugchess is doing better in later stage, I guess Francois was right, and Hamsters is doing even better, Alessandro must be proud!
Hamsters have the same performance as pseudo based on the ccrl list
From the ccrl list:
Hamsters 0.4 2691 +193 −159 79.2% −194.4 25.0% 12
49.9%
28 Pseudo 0.7c 2691 +20 −20 49.2% +4.1 38.9% 772
Maybe Alessandro Scotti was wrong when he claimed that hamster is probably weaker than kiwi at long time control
http://64.68.157.89/forum/viewtopic.php ... 86&t=15652
I also remember him claiming that Hamster is weaker than Pseudo.
Hamster's results so far fails do not show it.
Uri
swami
Posts: 6662Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am
Post by swami Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:42 pm
Uri Blass wrote: swami wrote: Bugchess is doing better in later stage, I guess Francois was right, and Hamsters is doing even better, Alessandro must be proud!
Hamsters have the same performance as pseudo based on the ccrl list
From the ccrl list:
Hamsters 0.4 2691 +193 −159 79.2% −194.4 25.0% 12
49.9%
28 Pseudo 0.7c 2691 +20 −20 49.2% +4.1 38.9% 772
Maybe Alessandro Scotti was wrong when he claimed that hamster is probably weaker than kiwi at long time control
http://64.68.157.89/forum/viewtopic.php ... 86&t=15652
I also remember him claiming that Hamster is weaker than Pseudo.
Hamster's results so far fails do not show it.
Uri
Yeah great improvement from Hamsters,Alessandro was just being modest.
He did really tell me that Hamsters is little better than Kiwi.Don't know where you got that info,maybe it was the older version of Hamsters that was weaekr than Kiwi.
no really.
