Belka,Glaurung 2.01 smp, Rybka, DS11,Zappa on Xeon

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

Daniel Charles

Belka,Glaurung 2.01 smp, Rybka, DS11,Zappa on Xeon

Post by Daniel Charles »

Xeon 5365
512 Mo
3-4-5
fritz10.ctg
Round robin ( 4 RR)
3 m + 2 (>= 5 mn)
180 games

Image



I just finished the test for Glaurung & Belka in a 4 Round Robin vs some top Chess engines

For this one I decide to use Fritz 10 which is a very good real tournament book (not draw book)

1st - With no Surprise Rybka of course Finished 1st ... a little surprise is that Rybka didn t kick Fruit and Toga Ass ...

2nd - is DS11 who did very good except on this tournament, It even kill Naum smp (3.5/4) , bad think is of course vs Rybka 0.5/4 and Zappa

3rd - Zappa Mexico just 0.5 behind DS11

4th - New Glaurung was impressive on 8 cpu , Maybe the new Free UCI engine King at least on 8 cpu (Wait and See )

5 - Naum did well vs Zappa (50 % ) However it lost too much points vs Rybka and DS11 on this test

6 - This Fruit Beta is for sure stronger than Fruit 2.3.1 (vs others chess engines ) , It was the only to beat Rybka on 4 games match

7 - Spike Draws a lot of games

8 - Toga did so so ... not too bad not too good ..

9 - Fritz 10 ... This is a surprise to see it so low because the test was with his own book supposed to be tuned for him !!!

10 - Belka played too fast , I expected him to be in the middle of this test , Strangely it did very bad only 2/36 !!! Maybe something gone wrong ....
especially in the end of game where it was killed
User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2993
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: Germany
Full name: Werner Schüle

Re: Belka,Glaurung 2.01 smp, Rybka, DS11,Zappa on Xeon

Post by Werner »

Hi Daniel,
Belka 1.8.13 has nomally no parameters set - all parameters are set to 0 by default. So better use version 12 or version 13 without person.txt
Werner
Daniel Charles

Re: Belka,Glaurung 2.01 smp, Rybka, DS11,Zappa on Xeon

Post by Daniel Charles »

Thanks Werner

Probably that s why It performed so badly ...
something was wrong ...

will make another test with version 12
ozziejoe
Posts: 811
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:07 pm

Re: Belka,Glaurung 2.01 smp, Rybka, DS11,Zappa on Xeon

Post by ozziejoe »

is not belka, according to vas, just a rybka 1.0 clone. why waste time on this engine?
User avatar
GenoM
Posts: 911
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Full name: Evgenii Manev

Re: Belka,Glaurung 2.01 smp, Rybka, DS11,Zappa on Xeon

Post by GenoM »

oh boy, another believer here... "according to Vas" Blah. What's about "according to the evidence"?
Last edited by GenoM on Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
take it easy :)
Tony Thomas

Re: Belka,Glaurung 2.01 smp, Rybka, DS11,Zappa on Xeon

Post by Tony Thomas »

GenoM wrote:oh boy, another believer here... "according to Vas" Blah.
I still wonder why he refuse to look at the code.
ozziejoe
Posts: 811
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:07 pm

Re: Belka,Glaurung 2.01 smp, Rybka, DS11,Zappa on Xeon

Post by ozziejoe »

anybody who watched strelka and rybka 1.0 play would be struck by the similarity....and then they share a very high ponder hit, higher than any other engine if my memory serves me correctly.

J
User avatar
GenoM
Posts: 911
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Full name: Evgenii Manev

Re: Belka,Glaurung 2.01 smp, Rybka, DS11,Zappa on Xeon

Post by GenoM »

Your memory serves you wrong. Look at the CCRL ponder hits statistics.
take it easy :)
User avatar
GenoM
Posts: 911
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Full name: Evgenii Manev

Re: Belka,Glaurung 2.01 smp, Rybka, DS11,Zappa on Xeon

Post by GenoM »

Just a hypothesis: he (Rajlich) was affraid to have any relationships with a man (Osipov) whos intentions he (Rajlich) can hardly understand.
take it easy :)
ozziejoe
Posts: 811
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:07 pm

Re: Belka,Glaurung 2.01 smp, Rybka, DS11,Zappa on Xeon

Post by ozziejoe »

I think there are some strong arguments here

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforu ... =2691;pg=1

Including the finding that strelka is more similar to rybka beta than rybka beta is later rybkas. there is other evidence presented in this thread that i find complelling. Too many coincidences. of course if someone can refute this evidence in some way i would be interested