PS: Movei 0.8.438 so far is having a great outcome too, and it might finish 1st or second
http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/1stdiv.htm
Moderator: Ras
Tiger lost against prodeo in the last 4 gamespichy wrote:Chess Tiger 2007-1 had a bad start, but slowly is climbing to the top of the 1st Division, and it already has played the best programs of this division, I truly believe that Chess Tiger will eventually pull it and end up in the first three places at the end of the match.
PS: Movei 0.8.438 so far is having a great outcome too, and it might finish 1st or second![]()
http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/1stdiv.htm
Tiger lost against Movei as well. So the Climbing is based on the other 8 rounds.Uri Blass wrote:Tiger lost against prodeo in the last 4 gamespichy wrote:Chess Tiger 2007-1 had a bad start, but slowly is climbing to the top of the 1st Division, and it already has played the best programs of this division, I truly believe that Chess Tiger will eventually pull it and end up in the first three places at the end of the match.
PS: Movei 0.8.438 so far is having a great outcome too, and it might finish 1st or second![]()
http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/1stdiv.htm
so the climbing is based on earlier rounds than round 10.
Uri
Tony, I believe that Chess Tiger 2007 had bad luck playing on this tourney , since the difference compared to Movei 0.8.438 in your first rating List is over 160 rating points, which I see a little bit too high for Chess Tiger 2007 UCi, or too low for Movei 0.8.438Tony Thomas wrote:Tiger lost against Movei as well. So the Climbing is based on the other 8 rounds.Uri Blass wrote:Tiger lost against prodeo in the last 4 gamespichy wrote:Chess Tiger 2007-1 had a bad start, but slowly is climbing to the top of the 1st Division, and it already has played the best programs of this division, I truly believe that Chess Tiger will eventually pull it and end up in the first three places at the end of the match.
PS: Movei 0.8.438 so far is having a great outcome too, and it might finish 1st or second![]()
http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/1stdiv.htm
so the climbing is based on earlier rounds than round 10.
Uri
The rating difference is clearly smaller than 160 elopichy wrote:Tony, I believe that Chess Tiger 2007 had bad luck playing on this tourney , since the difference compared to Movei 0.8.438 in your first rating List is over 160 rating points, which I see a little bit too high for Chess Tiger 2007 UCi, or too low for Movei 0.8.438Tony Thomas wrote:Tiger lost against Movei as well. So the Climbing is based on the other 8 rounds.Uri Blass wrote:Tiger lost against prodeo in the last 4 gamespichy wrote:Chess Tiger 2007-1 had a bad start, but slowly is climbing to the top of the 1st Division, and it already has played the best programs of this division, I truly believe that Chess Tiger will eventually pull it and end up in the first three places at the end of the match.
PS: Movei 0.8.438 so far is having a great outcome too, and it might finish 1st or second![]()
http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/1stdiv.htm
so the climbing is based on earlier rounds than round 10.
Uri
http://64.68.157.89/forum/viewtopic.php ... 73&t=18130
Amazing that a little setting change can increase Movei by 98 rating points, (10 10 10) must be the settings that wbec is usingUri Blass wrote:The rating difference is clearly smaller than 160 elopichy wrote:Tony, I believe that Chess Tiger 2007 had bad luck playing on this tourney , since the difference compared to Movei 0.8.438 in your first rating List is over 160 rating points, which I see a little bit too high for Chess Tiger 2007 UCi, or too low for Movei 0.8.438Tony Thomas wrote:Tiger lost against Movei as well. So the Climbing is based on the other 8 rounds.Uri Blass wrote:Tiger lost against prodeo in the last 4 gamespichy wrote:Chess Tiger 2007-1 had a bad start, but slowly is climbing to the top of the 1st Division, and it already has played the best programs of this division, I truly believe that Chess Tiger will eventually pull it and end up in the first three places at the end of the match.
PS: Movei 0.8.438 so far is having a great outcome too, and it might finish 1st or second![]()
http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/1stdiv.htm
so the climbing is based on earlier rounds than round 10.
Uri
http://64.68.157.89/forum/viewtopic.php ... 73&t=18130
From the ccrl 4040 list
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/r ... t_all.html
Movei 00.8.438(10 10 10) 2845 +270 −208 83.3% −187.5 33.3% 6
16 Chess Tiger 2007 2794 +16 −16 42.5% +51.7 40.0% 1359
52.8%
Chess Tiger 2007.1 2792 +15 −15 43.5% +44.2 41.4% 1540
50.2%
21 Movei 00.8.438 2747 +21 −21 53.1% −19.1 38.6% 761
53.5%
Not enough games to know.pichy wrote:Amazing that a little setting change can increase Movei by 98 rating points, (10 10 10) must be the settings that wbec is usingUri Blass wrote:The rating difference is clearly smaller than 160 elopichy wrote:Tony, I believe that Chess Tiger 2007 had bad luck playing on this tourney , since the difference compared to Movei 0.8.438 in your first rating List is over 160 rating points, which I see a little bit too high for Chess Tiger 2007 UCi, or too low for Movei 0.8.438Tony Thomas wrote:Tiger lost against Movei as well. So the Climbing is based on the other 8 rounds.Uri Blass wrote:Tiger lost against prodeo in the last 4 gamespichy wrote:Chess Tiger 2007-1 had a bad start, but slowly is climbing to the top of the 1st Division, and it already has played the best programs of this division, I truly believe that Chess Tiger will eventually pull it and end up in the first three places at the end of the match.
PS: Movei 0.8.438 so far is having a great outcome too, and it might finish 1st or second![]()
http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/1stdiv.htm
so the climbing is based on earlier rounds than round 10.
Uri
http://64.68.157.89/forum/viewtopic.php ... 73&t=18130
From the ccrl 4040 list
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/r ... t_all.html
Movei 00.8.438(10 10 10) 2845 +270 −208 83.3% −187.5 33.3% 6
16 Chess Tiger 2007 2794 +16 −16 42.5% +51.7 40.0% 1359
52.8%
Chess Tiger 2007.1 2792 +15 −15 43.5% +44.2 41.4% 1540
50.2%
21 Movei 00.8.438 2747 +21 −21 53.1% −19.1 38.6% 761
53.5%