Deep HIARCS 12 v Rybka 2.3.2a UCI 51-49!
Moderator: Ras
-
Tony Thomas
Re: Deep HIARCS 12 v Rybka 2.3.2a UCI 51-49!
How much of a difference do they expect?? Of 2 Elo?? Hiarcs has a history of offering settings that are weird. Remember the days when Hypermodern wasnt the default??
Ray, I remember that you were doing a book test, how did that go??
-
Uri Blass
- Posts: 10924
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
- Location: Tel-Aviv Israel
Re: Deep HIARCS 12 v Rybka 2.3.2a UCI 51-49!
Note that rybka was tested with 32 bits system so even this result suggest that hiarcs is still weaker than rybka(I did not expect something different).Yarget wrote:Very impressive performance by the latest Hiarcs version. Check here for more results at the Hiarcs website:
http://www.hiarcs.com/hiarcs_games.htm
Perhaps Hiarcs 12 is a big step forward and close to Rybka regarding playingstrength? I am looking forward to see some results from CEGT and CCRL.
Regards
Per
Uri
-
GenoM
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:46 pm
- Location: Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Full name: Evgenii Manev
Re: Deep HIARCS 12 v Rybka 2.3.2a UCI 51-49!
Interesting, why?Uri Blass wrote:I did not expect something different.
regards,
Geno
take it easy 
-
Spock
Re: Deep HIARCS 12 v Rybka 2.3.2a UCI 51-49!
Well only Mark and Harvey would know that, they have probably run hundreds of games. But Tom and I were concerned by the early fairly poor results we were getting with the default OFF setting, so decided we had better re-start the matches. Whether it makes any difference we won't know for quite a while. We'll finish testing with it ON, and then resume the previous matches for a bit and see what happensTony Thomas wrote:How much of a difference do they expect?? Of 2 Elo?? Hiarcs has a history of offering settings that are weird. Remember the days when Hypermodern wasnt the default??
Not me - Sedat did a lot of book testingTony Thomas wrote: Ray, I remember that you were doing a book test, how did that go??
-
Ovyron
- Posts: 4562
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am
Re: Deep HIARCS 12 v Rybka 2.3.2a UCI 51-49!
I guess that's because to be stronger than Rybka, HIARCS needed to have an ELO boost of more than 100 ELO and HIARCS's updates have never been as good.GenoM wrote:Interesting, why?Uri Blass wrote:I did not expect something different.
regards,
Geno
-
Tony Thomas
Re: Deep HIARCS 12 v Rybka 2.3.2a UCI 51-49!
Rybka gains well from 64bit, and if they are only equal on 32 bit, then there is no chance that Hiarcs could beat Rybka.Ovyron wrote:I guess that's because to be stronger than Rybka, HIARCS needed to have an ELO boost of more than 100 ELO and HIARCS's updates have never been as good.GenoM wrote:Interesting, why?Uri Blass wrote:I did not expect something different.
regards,
Geno
-
Jeroen
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:49 pm
-
Jeroen
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:49 pm
Post games please!
Hi,
Is it possible for the Hiarcs team to post the games of the Rybka match in this forum? As they tested against RybkaII.ctg I am curious how many Hiarcs wins were book wins
.
Thanks, Jeroen
Is it possible for the Hiarcs team to post the games of the Rybka match in this forum? As they tested against RybkaII.ctg I am curious how many Hiarcs wins were book wins
Thanks, Jeroen