Now it looks really nice, much better than the first version. IMO.gerold wrote:Looking good Olivier.Olivier Deville wrote:http://www.open-aurec.com/chesswar/
Hope you like it. Many thanks Norm
Olivier
Thanks also to Norman.
Best to you,
Gerold.
ChessWar website : new layout by Norman Schmidt
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 6081
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:14 pm
- Location: Munster, Nuremberg, Princeton
Re: ChessWar website : new layout by Norman Schmidt
-Popper and Lakatos are good but I'm stuck on Leibowitz
-
- Posts: 858
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:24 pm
- Location: Germany
- Full name: Daniel Mehrmann
Re: ChessWar website : new layout by Norman Schmidt
Bonjour Oliver !
I don't like it, specialy the colors.
Sorry.
Best,
Daniel
I don't like it, specialy the colors.

Sorry.
Best,
Daniel
Re: ChessWar website : new layout by Norman Schmidt
One thing I like about the new layout is the ease of navigation. May be rolf should learn to shut his trap if he has nothing nice to say.
-
- Posts: 44641
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: ChessWar website : new layout by Norman Schmidt
Why single out Rolf? Plenty of people round here need to shut their trap sometimes (including me!).Tony Thomas wrote:One thing I like about the new layout is the ease of navigation. May be rolf should learn to shut his trap if he has nothing nice to say.

gbanksnz at gmail.com
Re: ChessWar website : new layout by Norman Schmidt
but, but, you are always so proper and nice, even in a heated discussion. I wish I had shut my trap couple of times before I responded to you.Graham Banks wrote:Why single out Rolf? Plenty of people round here need to shut their trap sometimes (including me!).Tony Thomas wrote:One thing I like about the new layout is the ease of navigation. May be rolf should learn to shut his trap if he has nothing nice to say.
Belated Sorry regards
Tony
-
- Posts: 44641
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: ChessWar website : new layout by Norman Schmidt
Thanks to Goat for handing me a tissue.Tony Thomas wrote:but, but, you are always so proper and nice, even in a heated discussion. I wish I had shut my trap couple of times before I responded to you.Graham Banks wrote:Why single out Rolf? Plenty of people round here need to shut their trap sometimes (including me!).Tony Thomas wrote:One thing I like about the new layout is the ease of navigation. May be rolf should learn to shut his trap if he has nothing nice to say.
Belated Sorry regards
Tony

gbanksnz at gmail.com
Re: ChessWar website : new layout by Norman Schmidt
Thanks to Goat for handing me a tissue.Graham Banks wrote: Tony

Made of 100% natural lamb wool..

-
- Posts: 6081
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:14 pm
- Location: Munster, Nuremberg, Princeton
Re: ChessWar website : new layout by Norman Schmidt
What is nice? If I betray my own (subjective) perceptions? Ridiculous. But in one way you've understood what I'm doing. I would NEVER write something in triumph if someone agreed with me, or if I agree with someone. What a foolish waste of time. But as a member here I only write if I think I have something to say from my personal also professional perspective. By definition that must be different to many other members here. But I cant write for the broad masses anyway. I can only advise those who often want to rebel against my messages: just discard them from your memory and ignore me. You do this way yourself but also myself a big service. But the continual nitpicking and insulting, the overall respectlessness, is speaking against yourself not against myself. Farewell, goat lover and family...Tony Thomas wrote:One thing I like about the new layout is the ease of navigation. May be rolf should learn to shut his trap if he has nothing nice to say.
-Popper and Lakatos are good but I'm stuck on Leibowitz
Re: ChessWar website : new layout by Norman Schmidt
It's not the intend of the post that I am attacking, you could have just said, I do not like the lay out of the website. Instead you chose to use rather derogatory language.Rolf wrote:What is nice? If I betray my own (subjective) perceptions? Ridiculous. But in one way you've understood what I'm doing. I would NEVER write something in triumph if someone agreed with me, or if I agree with someone. What a foolish waste of time. But as a member here I only write if I think I have something to say from my personal also professional perspective. By definition that must be different to many other members here. But I cant write for the broad masses anyway. I can only advise those who often want to rebel against my messages: just discard them from your memory and ignore me. You do this way yourself but also myself a big service. But the continual nitpicking and insulting, the overall respectlessness, is speaking against yourself not against myself. Farewell, goat lover and family...Tony Thomas wrote:One thing I like about the new layout is the ease of navigation. May be rolf should learn to shut his trap if he has nothing nice to say.
in short crappy, with a bit froggy
-
- Posts: 6081
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:14 pm
- Location: Munster, Nuremberg, Princeton
Re: ChessWar website : new layout by Norman Schmidt
Yes, agreed, but this wasnt against the webpage author but about the four or five former praising writers. And right into THEIR vocabulary. Now you must not understand what this means but I chose this to somehow just make a joke about such praises in the light of the at first really dull design. Without the other feedback I wouldnt have looked at the page at all. But in that situation I took a look and was striken by the apparent contradiction. Froggy wasnt MY vocabulary. It came from Johan de H. As I said I took it as a joke in view of the ugly greenish first version of the page design.Tony Thomas wrote:It's not the intend of the post that I am attacking, you could have just said, I do not like the lay out of the website. Instead you chose to use rather derogatory language.Rolf wrote:What is nice? If I betray my own (subjective) perceptions? Ridiculous. But in one way you've understood what I'm doing. I would NEVER write something in triumph if someone agreed with me, or if I agree with someone. What a foolish waste of time. But as a member here I only write if I think I have something to say from my personal also professional perspective. By definition that must be different to many other members here. But I cant write for the broad masses anyway. I can only advise those who often want to rebel against my messages: just discard them from your memory and ignore me. You do this way yourself but also myself a big service. But the continual nitpicking and insulting, the overall respectlessness, is speaking against yourself not against myself. Farewell, goat lover and family...Tony Thomas wrote:One thing I like about the new layout is the ease of navigation. May be rolf should learn to shut his trap if he has nothing nice to say.
in short crappy, with a bit froggy
Ok, all together, would you now still think that I made an incredibly unallowed deragatory remark?? I dontg think so. It meant something completely different. But you for one could well admit once and for all that you dislike me. And you miss that I am trying practically the same what you are doing witgh your jokes, with my disadvantage of the weaker speech. But you really dont see at least some bits of joking in my usual messages? Alone my avatar. Isnt that fun? What made you so damn hateful? Why not ignoring me?
-Popper and Lakatos are good but I'm stuck on Leibowitz