Terry McCracken wrote:Somone with a bloody brain, that's who!
Your deceit will bury you.
Terry,
This post got a complaint. Personally I don't see it as an attack, but I think this thread is getting out of hand. Everybody here should stay civil, no need to get emotional. Any further trouble here and the thread will get locked or deleted.
Zach
The implication is that Rolf doesn't have a brain.
If I asked you whether you had a brain, wouldn't you see that as offensive?
I judge it as no offense in Zach's spirit because Terry cant impossibly judge about the existence of my brain, Grah. Let me offer a compromise:
I declare that I have no brain but Zach must promise that he doesnt want to bury the criticism here written against Zach himself and his allies, also because this would look as if he would want to moderate in his own affairs...
Now I think we all could see that I have no brain! QED
Terry isnt insulting me. Let's keep the mods out of our good relationships! I know how to handle him myself BTW.
-Popper and Lakatos are good but I'm stuck on Leibowitz
Terry McCracken wrote:Somone with a bloody brain, that's who!
Your deceit will bury you.
Terry,
This post got a complaint. Personally I don't see it as an attack, but I think this thread is getting out of hand. Everybody here should stay civil, no need to get emotional. Any further trouble here and the thread will get locked or deleted.
Zach
The implication is that Rolf doesn't have a brain.
If I asked you whether you had a brain, wouldn't you see that as offensive?
No! That wasn't the implication at all! In fact the reverse is true! Rolf claims he smarter than all of us and tosses my name into the mix, as he thinks his words are all that matters! Not so, and I like many others see through Rolf very quickly!
Terry McCracken wrote:
You guys screamed for evidence and it was provided. You screamed for proof and some of that was provided. Now YOU DEMAND answers on YOUR TIMETABLE while doing nothing at all other than attack top people in the field personally!!
That is Reprehensible!!!
It should stop now! In several months we may learn the whole truth, but not with people trying to impede the process!!
I have a lot of respect for those involved, but I abhor the way they went about their project.
As I said previously, don't drown the girl before it's proven she's a witch.
Perhaps in hindsight, they'd have gone about things differently.
Terry McCracken wrote:Somone with a bloody brain, that's who!
Your deceit will bury you.
Terry,
This post got a complaint. Personally I don't see it as an attack, but I think this thread is getting out of hand. Everybody here should stay civil, no need to get emotional. Any further trouble here and the thread will get locked or deleted.
Zach
The implication is that Rolf doesn't have a brain.
If I asked you whether you had a brain, wouldn't you see that as offensive?
I judge it as no offense in Zach's spirit because Terry cant impossibly judge about the existence of my brain, Grah. Let me offer a compromise:
I declare that I have no brain but Zach must promise that he doesnt want to bury the criticism here written against Zach himself and his allies, also because this would look as if he would want to moderate in his own affairs...
Now I think we all could see that I have no brain! QED
Terry isnt insulting me. Let's keep the mods out of our good relationships! I know how to handle him myself BTW.
Zach Wegner wrote:?? He didn't ask Rolf if he had a brain. I believe Terry was just saying that he had a brain, nothing more. Rolf asks "who is Terry?", Terry responds "someone with a brain." No attack IMO, but other mods may disagree.
Actually he wrote he has a bloody brain which means that he could be very dangerous already without having to make considerations. Please Zach, only for once, let me show you that I can handle a case like Terry without your interfering. Promised. I'm keeping it civil.
-Popper and Lakatos are good but I'm stuck on Leibowitz
Terry McCracken wrote:Somone with a bloody brain, that's who!
Your deceit will bury you.
Terry,
This post got a complaint. Personally I don't see it as an attack, but I think this thread is getting out of hand. Everybody here should stay civil, no need to get emotional. Any further trouble here and the thread will get locked or deleted.
Zach
The implication is that Rolf doesn't have a brain.
If I asked you whether you had a brain, wouldn't you see that as offensive?
No! That wasn't the implication at all! In fact the reverse is true! Rolf claims he smarter than all of us and tosses my name into the mix, as he thinks his words are all that matters! Not so, and I like many others see through Rolf very quickly!
If you didn't intend your post as an insult, then I apologise.
Graham Banks wrote:I have a lot of respect for those involved, but I abhor the way they went about their project.
Just curious, what exactly did we/they do?
It seems to me that whatever genuine efforts anybody had in this were drowned in an ocean of inane argumentation. IOW, neither side was fully to blame for what ensued.
Terry McCracken wrote:
You guys screamed for evidence and it was provided. You screamed for proof and some of that was provided. Now YOU DEMAND answers on YOUR TIMETABLE while doing nothing at all other than attack top people in the field personally!!
That is Reprehensible!!!
It should stop now! In several months we may learn the whole truth, but not with people trying to impede the process!!
I have a lot of respect for those involved, but I abhor the way they went about their project.
As I said previously, don't drown the girl before it's proven she's a witch.
Perhaps in hindsight, they'd have gone about things differently.
Cheers, Graham.
I don't think you do and I know George and Rolf don't. I grow weary of your bloody witch remarks as they're inappropriate and simply wrong.
All cases have been brought out in the open when something doesn't appear right, this case is no different. Or it shouldn't be.
However, had they all realized how they would have been recieved I'm sure they wouldn't have made anything public and exchanged it amongst themselves.
However, Rybka has been a disputed topic in the past and the people who brought it up weren't crucified over it!
Terry McCracken wrote:
The arrogance! Take your best shot Rolf!
Terry, this is the moment I count on you to keep it civil, for once you believe me that I'm not pouring evil on these 4 guys just like you told us that they havent done any harm to Vas. So, please say for this one time, yes, Rolf, in thanks for the two nice music pieces you've sent me from chess musicals, I believe you this one time that you are honest in this case and I want to let it just pass. I remain friendly and peaceful, This one time.
And I promise you that I would admire you for such improvement.
Are you ready, Terry? No arrogance, no nothing, just you and me who had sent you these tracks.
Peace for this time, ok?
Rolf regards of peace
-Popper and Lakatos are good but I'm stuck on Leibowitz
Graham Banks wrote:I have a lot of respect for those involved, but I abhor the way they went about their project.
Just curious, what exactly did we/they do?
It seems to me that whatever genuine efforts anybody had in this were drowned in an ocean of inane argumentation. IOW, neither side was fully to blame for what ensued.
You should build a watertight case and then present it rather than making accusations beforehand.
Last edited by Graham Banks on Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
