STS (v4.0) - "Square Vacancy"

[El Gringo]

Hi,

Results on Pentium Dual Core E5200 OC @3.7Ghz
50sec/move

Code: Select all

Deep Shredder 11 x64 2CPU           : 86/100
Deep Sjeng WC2008 x64 2CPU          : 89/100
Fruit 2.4 Beta A x64 2CPU           : 94/100 (!!)
Glaurung 2.2 x64 2CPU               : 91/100
Hiarcs 12.1 MP 2CPU                 : 89/100
Naum 4 x64 2CPU                     : 94/100
Rybka 3 x64 2CPU                    : 96/100
Zappa Mexico II x64 2CPU            : 86/100 

Best
Johan

[swami]

Hi,

Results on Pentium Dual Core E5200 OC @3.7Ghz
50sec/move

Code: Select all

Deep Shredder 11 x64 2CPU           : 86/100
Deep Sjeng WC2008 x64 2CPU          : 89/100
Fruit 2.4 Beta A x64 2CPU           : 94/100 (!!)
Glaurung 2.2 x64 2CPU               : 91/100
Hiarcs 12.1 MP 2CPU                 : 89/100
Naum 4 x64 2CPU                     : 94/100
Rybka 3 x64 2CPU                    : 96/100
Zappa Mexico II x64 2CPU            : 86/100 

Best
Johan

These results give nearly the clear indication of engine strength, except Glaurung has more knowledge of this than Deep Shredder, Zappa etc even though it's rated a few elo lesser than those engines. Good to see the beta version of Fruit getting this high.

Thanks for posting the results, Johan.

[swami]

For what it's worth, the latest development version of Myrddin (rated 1750-1800) gets 41 correct in 60s on a P4-3.0. Total score is 508.

jm

Tests on amateur engines is what interests me more than tests from top freeware engines. I could see the progress as the version gets updated. It'd also help to see if certain areas are improved so that it performs extra better on these suites, I'm interested in seeing if tuning or implementing knowledge as per the topic of suite really improves the elo.

Thanks.

[Vinvin]

Would you want to add stockfish 1.4, please ?
download here : http://homepages.tesco.net/henry.ablett/jims.html
or directly here : http://www.mediafire.com/?mihzcymwhlg

Thx,
Vincent


Table sorted :

Results on Pentium Dual Core E5200 OC @3.7Ghz
50sec/move

Code: Select all

Rybka 3 x64 2CPU                    : 96/100
Fruit 2.4 Beta A x64 2CPU           : 94/100 (!!)
Naum 4 x64 2CPU                     : 94/100
Glaurung 2.2 x64 2CPU               : 91/100
Hiarcs 12.1 MP 2CPU                 : 89/100
Deep Sjeng WC2008 x64 2CPU          : 89/100
Deep Shredder 11 x64 2CPU           : 86/100
Zappa Mexico II x64 2CPU            : 86/100 

Johan

[swami]

Would you want to add stockfish 1.4, please ?
download here : http://homepages.tesco.net/henry.ablett/jims.html
or directly here : http://www.mediafire.com/?mihzcymwhlg

Thx,
Vincent

Hi,

Results on Pentium Dual Core E5200 OC @3.7Ghz
50sec/move

Code: Select all

Deep Shredder 11 x64 2CPU           : 86/100
Deep Sjeng WC2008 x64 2CPU          : 89/100
Fruit 2.4 Beta A x64 2CPU           : 94/100 (!!)
Glaurung 2.2 x64 2CPU               : 91/100
Hiarcs 12.1 MP 2CPU                 : 89/100
Naum 4 x64 2CPU                     : 94/100
Rybka 3 x64 2CPU                    : 96/100
Zappa Mexico II x64 2CPU            : 86/100 

Best
Johan

Also, I'd like to see some results from Onno too.

[Spock]

Also, I'd like to see some results from Onno too.

I can do that - how much time should I allocate on my QX6700 ?
50 secs per move on the E5200 OC @3.7Ghz is probably say 60 secs for me, I'll use that

[Spock]

Onno x64

60 secs per move on QX6700 @ 2.93GHz

85 of 100 matching moves

[swami]

Onno x64

60 secs per move on QX6700 @ 2.93GHz

85 of 100 matching moves

Thank you. This is quite good score for a single CPU engine, It's on par with other commercial engines.

[Spock]

Can you post all the results you have ?

[Spock]

Rotor 0.5

60 secs per move on QX6700 @ 2.93GHz

70 of 100 matching moves