CCC Practice Game
Moderator: Ras
-
gerold
- Posts: 10121
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
- Location: van buren,missouri
Re: Move 31..
I vote for Bc5.Steve B wrote:The voting with about 12 hours to go (as i write)Graham Banks wrote:[d]r5k1/3p3p/2b1prp1/q7/1bP2BQP/1P6/2B1RPP1/3R2K1 b
Bc5-1
Bc3-2
Regards
Steve
Best,
Gerold.
-
Steve B
- Posts: 3697
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:26 pm
Re: Move 31..
So that makes it with 9 hours to TC (as i write)...gerold wrote:I vote for Bc5.Steve B wrote:The voting with about 12 hours to go (as i write)Graham Banks wrote:[d]r5k1/3p3p/2b1prp1/q7/1bP2BQP/1P6/2B1RPP1/3R2K1 b
Bc5-1
Bc3-2
Regards
Steve
Best,
Gerold.
Bc3-3
Bc5-2
Nother Horse Race Regards
Steve
-
playjunior
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:53 am
Re: Move 31..
Steve, btw... thanks for doing this, this is a really good idea.
-
Steve B
- Posts: 3697
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:26 pm
Re: Move 31..
Thanks Andranikplayjunior wrote:Steve, btw... thanks for doing this, this is a really good idea.
very happy you are enjoying the game ..as i hope all of the other participants and viewers are
Best Regards
Steve
-
Matthias Gemuh
- Posts: 3245
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:10 am
Re: Move 31..
correction !Matthias Gemuh wrote:My vote : 31 ... Bc3
Rook f6 must be made able to stay there, if white still has a dark square bishop. Bc3 is a defensive alternative to the offensive Bc5.
How else can white's looming Be5 be answered ?
Matthias.
My vote : 31 ... Bc5
... switching from boring defence to attack and excitement
Matthias.
My engine was quite strong till I added knowledge to it.
http://www.chess.hylogic.de
http://www.chess.hylogic.de
-
Steve B
- Posts: 3697
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:26 pm
Re: Move 31..
Matthias Gemuh wrote:
My vote : 31 ... Bc5
... switching from boring defence to attack and excitement![]()
Matthias.
And the pendulum swings to ..
Bc5-3
Bc3-2
6.5 Hours to TC Regards
Steve
-
Uri Blass
- Posts: 10923
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
- Location: Tel-Aviv Israel
Re: Move 31..
Today males are weak in chess relative to females and
black seems to lose the game because of not consulting with some female and now it seems to be too late.
For the record here is the opinion of the female that I asked
1.58/17 for white.
New game - Rybka 3 1-cpu 32-bit, 120'/40+120'/40+120'/40
[d]r5k1/3p3p/2b1prp1/q7/1bP2BQP/1P6/2B1RPP1/3R2K1 b - - 0 1
Analysis by Rybka 3 1-cpu 32-bit :
37...Bb4-c5
² (0.60) Depth: 2 00:00:00
37...Bb4-c5
² (0.68) Depth: 3 00:00:00
37...Bb4-c5
± (0.87) Depth: 4 00:00:00
37...Bb4-c3
± (0.76) Depth: 4 00:00:00
37...Rf6-f7
± (0.71) Depth: 4 00:00:00
37...Rf6-f7 38.f2-f3
± (0.78) Depth: 5 00:00:00
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5
± (0.77) Depth: 5 00:00:00
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.h4-h5
± (0.78) Depth: 6 00:00:00 7kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.h4-h5
± (0.78) Depth: 7 00:00:00 9kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.Bf4-d6 Bc5xd6
± (0.85) Depth: 8 00:00:00 15kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.Bf4-d6 Bc5xd6 40.Qg5xa5 Ra8xa5 41.Rd1xd6 Rf7-f4 42.g2-g3
± (0.96) Depth: 9 00:00:02 52kN
37...Bb4-c3 38.Bf4-d6 Rf6-f7 39.f2-f3 Bc6-b7 40.Qg4-g5 Qa5-b6+
± (1.00) Depth: 10 00:00:10 263kN
37...Bb4-c3 38.Bf4-d6 Rf6-f7 39.f2-f3 Bc6-b7 40.Qg4-g5 Qa5-b6+ 41.Qg5-c5 Qb6xc5+
± (0.94) Depth: 11 00:00:13 323kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7
± (1.05) Depth: 12 00:00:33 804kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7
± (1.20) Depth: 13 00:00:51 1368kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.Bf4-e5 Qa5-d8 40.Qg5xd8+ Ra8xd8 41.Be5-d6 Bc5xd6 42.Rd1xd6 Rd8-b8 43.Kg1-h2 Rf7-f8 44.f2-f3 Kg8-f7 45.Kh2-g3 Rb8-b4 46.Kg3-g4
± (1.14) Depth: 14 00:01:49 2970kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.Bf4-e5 Qa5-d8 40.Qg5xd8+ Ra8xd8 41.Be5-d6 Bc5xd6 42.Rd1xd6 Rd8-b8 43.Kg1-h2 Rf7-f8 44.f2-f3 Kg8-f7 45.Kh2-g3 Rb8-b4 46.Kg3-g4 Kf7-f6
± (1.11) Depth: 15 00:03:54 6692kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.h4-h5 Ra8-f8 39.Bf4-g3
± (1.15) Depth: 16 00:06:42 11040kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.h4-h5 Ra8-f8 39.Bf4-g3 Rf8-f7 40.h5xg6 h7xg6 41.Rd1-f1 Qa5-b4 42.Qg4-g5 Bc5-d4 43.Rf1-d1 Qb4-c5 44.Qg5xc5 Bd4xc5 45.Rd1-d2 Bc5-b4 46.Rd2-d4 Bb4-c5 47.Rd4-g4 Kg8-f8 48.Bc2-b1 e6-e5 49.Rg4xg6 Rf6xg6 50.Bb1xg6 Rf7-g7 51.Re2xe5 Bc5xf2+ 52.Kg1xf2 Rg7xg6
+- (1.58) Depth: 17 00:53:28 85744kN
(so k, 10.08.2009)
black seems to lose the game because of not consulting with some female and now it seems to be too late.
For the record here is the opinion of the female that I asked
1.58/17 for white.
New game - Rybka 3 1-cpu 32-bit, 120'/40+120'/40+120'/40
[d]r5k1/3p3p/2b1prp1/q7/1bP2BQP/1P6/2B1RPP1/3R2K1 b - - 0 1
Analysis by Rybka 3 1-cpu 32-bit :
37...Bb4-c5
² (0.60) Depth: 2 00:00:00
37...Bb4-c5
² (0.68) Depth: 3 00:00:00
37...Bb4-c5
± (0.87) Depth: 4 00:00:00
37...Bb4-c3
± (0.76) Depth: 4 00:00:00
37...Rf6-f7
± (0.71) Depth: 4 00:00:00
37...Rf6-f7 38.f2-f3
± (0.78) Depth: 5 00:00:00
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5
± (0.77) Depth: 5 00:00:00
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.h4-h5
± (0.78) Depth: 6 00:00:00 7kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.h4-h5
± (0.78) Depth: 7 00:00:00 9kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.Bf4-d6 Bc5xd6
± (0.85) Depth: 8 00:00:00 15kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.Bf4-d6 Bc5xd6 40.Qg5xa5 Ra8xa5 41.Rd1xd6 Rf7-f4 42.g2-g3
± (0.96) Depth: 9 00:00:02 52kN
37...Bb4-c3 38.Bf4-d6 Rf6-f7 39.f2-f3 Bc6-b7 40.Qg4-g5 Qa5-b6+
± (1.00) Depth: 10 00:00:10 263kN
37...Bb4-c3 38.Bf4-d6 Rf6-f7 39.f2-f3 Bc6-b7 40.Qg4-g5 Qa5-b6+ 41.Qg5-c5 Qb6xc5+
± (0.94) Depth: 11 00:00:13 323kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7
± (1.05) Depth: 12 00:00:33 804kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7
± (1.20) Depth: 13 00:00:51 1368kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.Bf4-e5 Qa5-d8 40.Qg5xd8+ Ra8xd8 41.Be5-d6 Bc5xd6 42.Rd1xd6 Rd8-b8 43.Kg1-h2 Rf7-f8 44.f2-f3 Kg8-f7 45.Kh2-g3 Rb8-b4 46.Kg3-g4
± (1.14) Depth: 14 00:01:49 2970kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.Bf4-e5 Qa5-d8 40.Qg5xd8+ Ra8xd8 41.Be5-d6 Bc5xd6 42.Rd1xd6 Rd8-b8 43.Kg1-h2 Rf7-f8 44.f2-f3 Kg8-f7 45.Kh2-g3 Rb8-b4 46.Kg3-g4 Kf7-f6
± (1.11) Depth: 15 00:03:54 6692kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.h4-h5 Ra8-f8 39.Bf4-g3
± (1.15) Depth: 16 00:06:42 11040kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.h4-h5 Ra8-f8 39.Bf4-g3 Rf8-f7 40.h5xg6 h7xg6 41.Rd1-f1 Qa5-b4 42.Qg4-g5 Bc5-d4 43.Rf1-d1 Qb4-c5 44.Qg5xc5 Bd4xc5 45.Rd1-d2 Bc5-b4 46.Rd2-d4 Bb4-c5 47.Rd4-g4 Kg8-f8 48.Bc2-b1 e6-e5 49.Rg4xg6 Rf6xg6 50.Bb1xg6 Rf7-g7 51.Re2xe5 Bc5xf2+ 52.Kg1xf2 Rg7xg6
+- (1.58) Depth: 17 00:53:28 85744kN
(so k, 10.08.2009)
-
Christopher Conkie
- Posts: 6074
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: Move 31..
Bc5 h5 Raf8 Bg3 R8f7 hxg6 hxg6 Rf1 Qb4 Bh4 Rf4 Qg3 Bd6 Rd1 Qc5playjunior wrote:Funny, the first line after Rf1 looks so dead lost to me.Christopher Conkie wrote:Bc5Matthias Gemuh wrote:My vote : 31 ... Bc3
Rook f6 must be made able to stay there, if white still has a dark square bishop. Bc3 is a defensive alternative to the offensive Bc5.
How else can white's looming Be5 be answered ?
Matthias.
Let me show you a line or two Matthias.
Bc5 h5 Raf8 Bg3 R8f7 hxg6 hxg6 Rf1 Qb4 Bh4
and.......
Bc5 h5 Raf8 Bg3 R8f7 hxg6 hxg6 b4
Both these lines are very nice for us and quite likely.
For sure it's Bc5 for me.
Christopher
I vote for Bc3
That takes it a little further.
Christopher
-
Steve B
- Posts: 3697
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:26 pm
Re: Move 31..
Im sorry Uri but i do not know if you are placing a vote ?Uri Blass wrote:Today males are weak in chess relative to females and
black seems to lose the game because of not consulting with some female and now it seems to be too late.
For the record here is the opinion of the female that I asked
1.58/17 for white.
New game - Rybka 3 1-cpu 32-bit, 120'/40+120'/40+120'/40
[d]r5k1/3p3p/2b1prp1/q7/1bP2BQP/1P6/2B1RPP1/3R2K1 b - - 0 1
Analysis by Rybka 3 1-cpu 32-bit :
37...Bb4-c5
² (0.60) Depth: 2 00:00:00
37...Bb4-c5
² (0.68) Depth: 3 00:00:00
37...Bb4-c5
± (0.87) Depth: 4 00:00:00
37...Bb4-c3
± (0.76) Depth: 4 00:00:00
37...Rf6-f7
± (0.71) Depth: 4 00:00:00
37...Rf6-f7 38.f2-f3
± (0.78) Depth: 5 00:00:00
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5
± (0.77) Depth: 5 00:00:00
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.h4-h5
± (0.78) Depth: 6 00:00:00 7kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.h4-h5
± (0.78) Depth: 7 00:00:00 9kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.Bf4-d6 Bc5xd6
± (0.85) Depth: 8 00:00:00 15kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.Bf4-d6 Bc5xd6 40.Qg5xa5 Ra8xa5 41.Rd1xd6 Rf7-f4 42.g2-g3
± (0.96) Depth: 9 00:00:02 52kN
37...Bb4-c3 38.Bf4-d6 Rf6-f7 39.f2-f3 Bc6-b7 40.Qg4-g5 Qa5-b6+
± (1.00) Depth: 10 00:00:10 263kN
37...Bb4-c3 38.Bf4-d6 Rf6-f7 39.f2-f3 Bc6-b7 40.Qg4-g5 Qa5-b6+ 41.Qg5-c5 Qb6xc5+
± (0.94) Depth: 11 00:00:13 323kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7
± (1.05) Depth: 12 00:00:33 804kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7
± (1.20) Depth: 13 00:00:51 1368kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.Bf4-e5 Qa5-d8 40.Qg5xd8+ Ra8xd8 41.Be5-d6 Bc5xd6 42.Rd1xd6 Rd8-b8 43.Kg1-h2 Rf7-f8 44.f2-f3 Kg8-f7 45.Kh2-g3 Rb8-b4 46.Kg3-g4
± (1.14) Depth: 14 00:01:49 2970kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.Qg4-g5 Rf6-f7 39.Bf4-e5 Qa5-d8 40.Qg5xd8+ Ra8xd8 41.Be5-d6 Bc5xd6 42.Rd1xd6 Rd8-b8 43.Kg1-h2 Rf7-f8 44.f2-f3 Kg8-f7 45.Kh2-g3 Rb8-b4 46.Kg3-g4 Kf7-f6
± (1.11) Depth: 15 00:03:54 6692kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.h4-h5 Ra8-f8 39.Bf4-g3
± (1.15) Depth: 16 00:06:42 11040kN
37...Bb4-c5 38.h4-h5 Ra8-f8 39.Bf4-g3 Rf8-f7 40.h5xg6 h7xg6 41.Rd1-f1 Qa5-b4 42.Qg4-g5 Bc5-d4 43.Rf1-d1 Qb4-c5 44.Qg5xc5 Bd4xc5 45.Rd1-d2 Bc5-b4 46.Rd2-d4 Bb4-c5 47.Rd4-g4 Kg8-f8 48.Bc2-b1 e6-e5 49.Rg4xg6 Rf6xg6 50.Bb1xg6 Rf7-g7 51.Re2xe5 Bc5xf2+ 52.Kg1xf2 Rg7xg6
+- (1.58) Depth: 17 00:53:28 85744kN
(so k, 10.08.2009)
is there a move in there you are voting for?
Squinting Regards
Steve