Christopher
CCC Forum vs BigLion chess960
Moderator: Ras
-
Christopher Conkie
- Posts: 6074
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: CCC Forum vs BigLion chess960
a5 the misdirectionists move.

Christopher
Christopher
-
gerold
- Posts: 10121
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
- Location: van buren,missouri
Re: CCC Forum vs BigLion chess960
Ok so i will switch my vote to a5.Christopher Conkie wrote:a5 the misdirectionists move.
Christopher
White is losing this game to BL.
Maybe playing to a5 will give white
a chance to get better position on the King side.
Best.
Gerold.
-
tano-urayoan
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:23 pm
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
-
tano-urayoan
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:23 pm
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: CCC Forum vs BigLion chess960
Why is white losing Gerold?gerold wrote:Ok so i will switch my vote to a5.White is losing this game to BL.Maybe playing to a5 will give white
a chance to get better position on the King side.
Best.
Gerold.
-
tano-urayoan
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:23 pm
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: CCC Forum vs BigLion chess960
Graham you don't think is best to undermine f6 via e4 e5, so the knight will be better placed in f3?Graham Banks wrote:16....f6 was expected really. A good multi-purpose move.
I'm voting for 17.Nd2, clearing the way for a probable f4.
-
gerold
- Posts: 10121
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
- Location: van buren,missouri
Re: CCC Forum vs BigLion chess960
Very poor position on King side.tano-urayoan wrote:Why is white losing Gerold?gerold wrote:Ok so i will switch my vote to a5.White is losing this game to BL.Maybe playing to a5 will give white
a chance to get better position on the King side.
Best.
Gerold.
Q side has to be settled before any progress can be made
to control the middle of the board.
AT best now would be a draw and no win.
This is a very close game. one weak move
would be a win for BL.
Last edited by gerold on Wed Oct 07, 2009 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
tano-urayoan
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:23 pm
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: CCC Forum vs BigLion chess960
Our kingside position is a standard one , knight in f3, bishop in e2 and a pawn in h3, and e3 where is the problem?
-
gerold
- Posts: 10121
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
- Location: van buren,missouri
Re: CCC Forum vs BigLion chess960
To many pieces blocked and pawns advanced to far.tano-urayoan wrote:Our kingside position is a standard one , knight in f3, bishop in e2 and a pawn in h3, and e3 where is the problem?
While BL has all pawns on King side in place with major pieces
ready to attack or block whites advances.
Best .
Gerold.
-
Christopher Conkie
- Posts: 6074
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: CCC Forum vs BigLion chess960
I really wish we had played dxc5. I honestly think that we would be winning by now. The fork was not an issue and all our pieces were pointing along the long diagonals at the king.gerold wrote:To many pieces blocked and pawns advanced to far.tano-urayoan wrote:Our kingside position is a standard one , knight in f3, bishop in e2 and a pawn in h3, and e3 where is the problem?
While BL has all pawns on King side in place with major pieces
ready to attack or block whites advances.
Best .
Gerold.
Now that the move has past perhaps we could analyse it?
I think a5 is nice now because we expose any weakness in BL's flank play. It is also quite progressive (to me anyway - moving forward as Steve says).
Christopher
-
Sven
- Posts: 4052
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 9:57 pm
- Location: Berlin, Germany
- Full name: Sven Schüle
Re: CCC Forum vs BigLion chess960
May I jump in for a short moment, even if I can't follow the game continuously?
I would play a5, too, but for a different reason. I think BL has created a huge weakness on e6 with its last move f6. Therefore I would consider Nf3-e1-d3-f4 but also (after Ne1) playing Bg4 with the idea of either Be6 or even exchanging white bishops to prepare later Nf4-e6. Since a5 prevents black from playing Nb6 to attack c4, moving Be2 away from its job to guard Pc4 becomes possible.
Just an idea.
I think white has equal chances at least. I see no big weaknesses on the white side but the black pawn structure appears dubious to me.
So a5.
Just a note: my OTB rating is about 1900 (national rating) so please apologize if I have missed some very basic refutation of my plan.
Sven
I would play a5, too, but for a different reason. I think BL has created a huge weakness on e6 with its last move f6. Therefore I would consider Nf3-e1-d3-f4 but also (after Ne1) playing Bg4 with the idea of either Be6 or even exchanging white bishops to prepare later Nf4-e6. Since a5 prevents black from playing Nb6 to attack c4, moving Be2 away from its job to guard Pc4 becomes possible.
Just an idea.
I think white has equal chances at least. I see no big weaknesses on the white side but the black pawn structure appears dubious to me.
So a5.
Just a note: my OTB rating is about 1900 (national rating) so please apologize if I have missed some very basic refutation of my plan.
Sven