It was Graham who suggested the move, I just looked and thought about it.Spock wrote:OK, I won't do it againMatthias Gemuh wrote: Hi Ray,
if moving a knight to e5 is a comfirmed bad move, capturing it suddenly becomes one of the best options to scrutinize![]()
You should have waited till the forum finishes voting.
Cheers,
Matthias.![]()
Maybe it is not a bad move after all, I used just one engine to briefly take a look after Christopher's comment, other engines may see things differently - although I'm not going to find out - it takes the mystery and intrigue away for me
See the position after it takes back, which it must.
[d]1qbr1rk1/p1b1p1pp/1p1n4/2pPp3/P1P1P3/4N2P/3NBPP1/Q1R2RK1 w - -
Double pawns, weak kingside, add to that the fact that a5 is now super (or even Bg4) and I'm sold on it.
Christopher