Moderator: Ras
http://www.google.com/trends?q=ferrari% ... all&sort=0playjunior wrote:http://www.google.com/trends?q=rybka+ch ... all&sort=0
Rybka has never been the frontrunner in sales IMO.
BestGoogle Trends provides insights into broad search patterns. Please keep in mind that several approximations are used when computing these results.
It's cute, but while I can imagine people googling Ferrari and buying VW, why should the same be true for Rybka and Chessmaster? They cost the same don't they?F. Bluemers wrote:http://www.google.com/trends?q=ferrari% ... all&sort=0playjunior wrote:http://www.google.com/trends?q=rybka+ch ... all&sort=0
Rybka has never been the frontrunner in sales IMO.
Ah yes,almost everybody has a Ferrari.
BestGoogle Trends provides insights into broad search patterns. Please keep in mind that several approximations are used when computing these results.
Fonzy
He tried to show that your proof you gave to support your argument was incorrect. He succeeded!playjunior wrote:It's cute, but while I can imagine people googling Ferrari and buying VW, why should the same be true for Rybka and Chessmaster? They cost the same don't they?F. Bluemers wrote:http://www.google.com/trends?q=ferrari% ... all&sort=0playjunior wrote:http://www.google.com/trends?q=rybka+ch ... all&sort=0
Rybka has never been the frontrunner in sales IMO.
Ah yes,almost everybody has a Ferrari.
BestGoogle Trends provides insights into broad search patterns. Please keep in mind that several approximations are used when computing these results.
Fonzy
Have you ever seen a single Rybka package in a electronics store?
You might be right about the sales(I think you probably are),but to me the search stats are just what they are.playjunior wrote:It's cute, but while I can imagine people googling Ferrari and buying VW, why should the same be true for Rybka and Chessmaster? They cost the same don't they?F. Bluemers wrote:http://www.google.com/trends?q=ferrari% ... all&sort=0playjunior wrote:http://www.google.com/trends?q=rybka+ch ... all&sort=0
Rybka has never been the frontrunner in sales IMO.
Ah yes,almost everybody has a Ferrari.
BestGoogle Trends provides insights into broad search patterns. Please keep in mind that several approximations are used when computing these results.
Fonzy
Have you ever seen a single Rybka package in a electronics store?
It was not a proof, it was an evidence. I still think it supports my claim if you assume that popularity => more sales in computer chess, because the prices are around the same. In car sales that part does not hold.George Tsavdaris wrote:He tried to show that your proof you gave to support your argument was incorrect. He succeeded!playjunior wrote:It's cute, but while I can imagine people googling Ferrari and buying VW, why should the same be true for Rybka and Chessmaster? They cost the same don't they?F. Bluemers wrote:http://www.google.com/trends?q=ferrari% ... all&sort=0playjunior wrote:http://www.google.com/trends?q=rybka+ch ... all&sort=0
Rybka has never been the frontrunner in sales IMO.
Ah yes,almost everybody has a Ferrari.
BestGoogle Trends provides insights into broad search patterns. Please keep in mind that several approximations are used when computing these results.
Fonzy
Have you ever seen a single Rybka package in a electronics store?
What you bring now is another kind of argumentation, another kind of proof. And i agree with this. Chessmaster has way higher publicity and sales generally than Rybka.
You said that in your earlier post. But why does it matter and what has to do with our case? Because Rybka has much less sales than Chessmaster says what?
I'm surprised to see Philippines and Tagalog language there. I never thought my country could be that interested in chess engines.playjunior wrote:http://www.google.com/trends?q=rybka+ch ... all&sort=0