IPP controversy in wikipedia
Moderator: Ras
-
Sylwy
- Posts: 5179
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IAȘI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: Silvian Rucsandescu
-
Dr.Wael Deeb
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: IPP controversy in wikipedia
In October 2009, a chess engine called IPPOLOT was released, which according to some tests is stronger than the latest available version of Rybka.Author of Rybka stated that IPPOLIT is a clone of Rybka.However IPPOLIT is not only stronger, but significantly different: the code is smaller, uses less memory and uses different strategy.
Gentlemen,make your bets please
Dr.D
Gentlemen,make your bets please
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
Harvey Williamson
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 11:12 pm
- Location: Whitchurch. Shropshire, UK.
- Full name: Harvey Williamson
Re: IPP controversy in wikipedia
Wiki is a great source of information but as just about anyone can edit any page it should never be trusted.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:In October 2009, a chess engine called IPPOLOT was released, which according to some tests is stronger than the latest available version of Rybka.Author of Rybka stated that IPPOLIT is a clone of Rybka.However IPPOLIT is not only stronger, but significantly different: the code is smaller, uses less memory and uses different strategy.
Gentlemen,make your bets please![]()
Dr.D
-
Dr.Wael Deeb
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: IPP controversy in wikipedia
Totaly agreed Harvey,but is getting a little spicy here in the forum and Silvian brought a breeze of a fresh air....Harvey Williamson wrote:Wiki is a great source of information but as just about anyone can edit any page it should never be trusted.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:In October 2009, a chess engine called IPPOLOT was released, which according to some tests is stronger than the latest available version of Rybka.Author of Rybka stated that IPPOLIT is a clone of Rybka.However IPPOLIT is not only stronger, but significantly different: the code is smaller, uses less memory and uses different strategy.
Gentlemen,make your bets please![]()
Dr.D
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
gerold
- Posts: 10121
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
- Location: van buren,missouri
Re: IPP controversy in wikipedia
THe person who posted it on the Wiki must have taken notesDr.Wael Deeb wrote:Totaly agreed Harvey,but is getting a little spicy here in the forum and Silvian brought a breeze of a fresh air....Harvey Williamson wrote:Wiki is a great source of information but as just about anyone can edit any page it should never be trusted.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:In October 2009, a chess engine called IPPOLOT was released, which according to some tests is stronger than the latest available version of Rybka.Author of Rybka stated that IPPOLIT is a clone of Rybka.However IPPOLIT is not only stronger, but significantly different: the code is smaller, uses less memory and uses different strategy.
Gentlemen,make your bets please![]()
Dr.D
Dr.D
from here and from the Rybka forum.Same thing noting new
Best.
Gerold.