Christopher Conkie wrote:Michael Sherwin wrote: I should just let you to wallow around in your mud pit of idiocy all by your lonesome. But, I just can't resist pointing out your idiocy in the hope that you may learn something.Have the Deeb words gone to your head? Oh well.....let's see what trough your snout is in. I'm sure it beats idiocy if that is where I am.
* just words devoid of any substance *
You mentioned God (what he has to with it, I don't know). To some that is a fairy story.1.) "Fairy stories", is just a derogatory term you used to take an imaginary high ground so you can shout down at me to make yourself look better than me. I told no stories and the only mention of fairies was by you.
* Of course you don't! It was metaphor. My personal beliefs about God are none of your business *
You said "I deserve only what God says I deserve at the judgement". That is not a metaphor. It does not compare anything. It is a clear statement.2.) My use of the word "panel" was to illustrate that if there is to be a judgement then you will in no way be judging me. It was a metaphor! You do know what a metaphor is, don't you?
* It compares the importance of judgement by you to the importance of judgement by--in your stance--a possibly fictional character. What does that make you? More irrelevant than a possible fiction. *
Now that is really smug....... Thanks for proving the point.3.) Self righteous people do not care about judgement from a higher being. That is why they are self righteous. Sounds more like you than me.
* Oh come on, more judgement? Who died and made you God? Of course the truly self righteous put themselves in the place of God at every opportunity. More metaphor, I am comparing you to God! *
Many people are telling you it is a disassembled Rybka. The rest you need to work out for yourself.4.) If there is a judge--what did I steal? Nothing! But, there you go judging me in place of him. And doing a bad job of it.
* Most of the many just say they believe it to be a clone. No one has offered any real proof. I welcome the day that happens. But, until then I wont just take the word of someone that is valued by me to be less than fictional. *
There was no point for you to make the thread. The thing you made already existed before you made it. It was not the brightest thing to do really.5.) Unfortunately, you are one of those that are around me. There was absolutely no point for you to have chimed in on this thread to pass judgement in the first place. Just doing some mud slinging from your mud pit aye.
* Just because you do not understand the reason I made this poll does not make it pointless. Slinging mud is pointless. The only thing that you have accomplished is to make me type more words. *
You care about a God that may or may not exist?So, let me sum up. I care about judgement from a God that I can not prove is there or not there and nothing at all about any judgement from you. Can I make it any more plain than that? Let me know.Don't let him hear you say that. Belief is not reward based.
* Twisting in the wind to sound good is desperation. *
* Keep your following intellectual snobbishness for yourself. I do not need enlightenment from you. *
Pascal's Wager suffers from the logical fallacy of the false dilemma. You could try the following but inevitably it is just as bad.Code: Select all
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal's_Wager
You best bet so far, is that the worms eat you when you go. Think of the fertiliser you will create.Code: Select all
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheist's_Wager
* I will care about my stinking rotting corpse just as much I will care about yours. *
Christopher
You just do not get it do you?
I do not care about you or anything you have to say and yet you just keep blithering.
Well, on a not so friendly note.
You are the reason that I stopped participating at the Open War chat! You were the one person that was so repugnant to me that made me dread going there. How is that for a little non fiction?
.