Thoughts...

[Graham Banks]

So why Vasik is keeping his mouth shut
Or it's a better strategy not to bebate or prove anything to the stupid sheeps that buy his program because they will buy it anyway....
Dr.D

Vas gave up work to develop Rybka fulltime, so it's effectively his income earner.
As a doctor, how would you feel if your patients or your employer didn't see any reason why they should pay you for your services?

Cheers,
Graham.

If I was to steal your car, paint it white, register the motor vehicle in my own name, and convert it to a taxi, would it be ok, as it would effectively be my income earner?

Anton.

I doubt he got it, Anton.

Oh I got it alright. You're all directly accusing Vas of outright theft in a public form.

[Matthias Gemuh]

And if Vas declared ONCE that the clone was a clone then he is a goat like jumper??

Strelka + Ippolit add up to ONCE ?

.

... Vas declared only once when a lethal clone appeared, only once for each of the two clones.

...

So, what I wanted to ask for, where did I count a false number when I said once?

once twice is twice, not once.

.

[Graham Banks]

Thanks Jury. That confirms that unless the source code in question was deliberately leaked by Vas, it has been stolen and that Ippo/Robbo are therefore illegal.

Cheers,
Graham.

OK Graham, I am looking forward to see your explenation why I get punished for "VR's statement was wrong" and why you say "Thank you" fo Juri for his "Vas was lying".

Even more why you trust someone who himself decompiled Rybka, published the sources, and why you punish me for supposed "supporting cloners"

Really, this is funny. The only reason for your behaviour is, Juri comes to a conclusion that fits in your philosophy.

I bet you also don't want Obama to close Guantanamo.

Maybe Juri is right, but still some proofes or at least some explenations are missing...

As you admitted yourself in one of your posts, Jury is probably the best person apart from Vas who would know.

[slobo]

And if Vas declared ONCE that the clone was a clone then he is a goat like jumper??

Strelka + Ippolit add up to ONCE ?

.

Thanks for your best shot but sorry, I must contradict you. You misunderstand my language. Dont worry, I know enough about logic and methodology plus the science of science that I can be confident of being correct if I count Vas statement the way I did. A goat jumps up and down, this is what the enemies are doing with their campaign on a daily basis, but Vas declared only once when a lethal clone appeared, only once for each of the two clones. Strelka once and then the other also only once.

The interesting detail for CCC is unfortunately that here people get applause and friendliness when they have declared in the past that they want to do harm to a special programmer. Instead that the community hates some wrongdoer like "Ossipov" he is welcomed as if he were a hero who tried to destroy Vasik Rajlich. And many anonymous people are applauding, nobody except me is contradicting and describing the evil. I forgot to mention Anton but who is a noname to me. Sorry Anton.

So, what I wanted to ask for, where did I count a false number when I said once?

Why is so much hate in our little community?

Life is too short for such nonsense. Please I appeal to all. Dont let you be torn into gutter style, only because you were mistreated yourself once in a while. Also if you have no faith, please think positive because that is much saner than the negative. I can only assure all sinners here that negative thoughts eat you up from inside while if you love even you hardest enemy you live your life on the bright side. That is just psychology which is my main profession.

Peace!

Have you cogitated the possibility be be pope again?

[Alexander Schmidt]

As you admitted yourself in one of your posts, Jury is probably the best person apart from Vas who would know.

So you believe Vas was lying?

[Graham Banks]

As you admitted yourself in one of your posts, Jury is probably the best person apart from Vas who would know.

So you believe Vas was lying?

About the code being from Rybka 3 rather than later code? Could have been, but would have had his reasons for doing so, I'm sure.

Cheers,
Graham.

[Christopher Conkie]

As you admitted yourself in one of your posts, Jury is probably the best person apart from Vas who would know.

So you believe Vas was lying?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hm_yzJ99ZYs

http://www.lyricsfreak.com/t/the/sweet+ ... 36192.html

He would say that, but then Juri would also propagate it by compiling it.

Let's see who Convekta go for......right?

What a twisted web this is.

Anyway 0.45 and 4.56 in the video, they are good for the (lemon) soul.

We help to make a free GUI, and that is a fact. We do our best to keep it clean within reasonable parameters.

Don't want no dirty scummy fish in it. It's a C(G)od war.....

Christmas is coming. Let see what Santa brings......



CTF Mod greetings from the forum that has no (lemon) soul supposedly.......



Christopher

[Rolf]

As you admitted yourself in one of your posts, Jury is probably the best person apart from Vas who would know.

So you believe Vas was lying?

About the code being from Rybka 3 rather than later code? Could have been, but would have had his reasons for doing so.

Cheers,
Graham.

Is there anybody who is forced to speak the truth if he's talking with crook? Or let's ask the question this way: is the FBI forced to only speak the truth even if that would mean that crook gets important signals? Being harrassed by crook is bad enough but is it therefore forced to add another misfortune to the first?

To all these questions KungFuDse made legendary answers. He said "NO!" to each question above. Although it might sound unfriendly but he insisted and said No! So you see what wise men are capable of. I knew that the MIT is a very special facility for mega brainers.

[Alexander Schmidt]

As you admitted yourself in one of your posts, Jury is probably the best person apart from Vas who would know.

So you believe Vas was lying?

About the code being from Rybka 3 rather than later code? Could have been, but would have had his reasons for doing so, I'm sure.

Cheers,
Graham.

OK, then no more punishment for me when I say the statement was wrong

[Alexander Schmidt]

Is there anybody who is forced to speak the truth if he's talking with crook? Or let's ask the question this way: is the FBI forced to only speak the truth even if that would mean that crook gets important signals? Being harrassed by crook is bad enough but is it therefore forced to add another misfortune to the first?

To all these questions KungFuDse made legendary answers. He said "NO!" to each question above. Although it might sound unfriendly but he insisted and said No! So you see what wise men are capable of. I knew that the MIT is a very special facility for mega brainers.

Rolf, no need to talk to me anymore, because I don't read your posts. I just don't understand what you wanna say to me.

Have a nice day.