Moderator: Ras
Definitely you did not get it.Graham Banks wrote:Why worry about your own car when you can steal your neighbour's better one?slobo wrote: Who would need Rybka 3´s code to be open if we already have the open code of an engine 60-65 elo points stronger than Rybka 3?
Red text added by me.slobo wrote:Definitely you did not get it.Graham Banks wrote:Why worry about your own car when you can steal your neighbour's better one?slobo wrote: Who would need Rybka 3´s code to be open if we already have the open code of an engine 60-65 elo points stronger than Rybka 3?
The correct understanding of my post would result into the following statement:
Why worry about my neighbour's old car when I have my own and better one which I received as stolen goods?
The answer is simple. In a group of honest people the statement by a member is higher valued than the one of stealing thieves and their claque. Also because the member has a real name while the thieves have not. In our culture it's unusual that anonymous people could challenge a decent member on moral grounds. No idea why you have it the other way round?SzG wrote:You fail to stop calling it stealth. Got some evidence finally?Graham Banks wrote:Red text added by me.Why worry about my neighbour's old car when I have my own and better one which I received as stolen goods?
I do respect Gabor highly. It's just that we have different opinions on this issue.Rolf wrote:The answer is simple. In a group of honest people the statement by a member is higher valued than the one of stealing thieves and their claque. Also because the member has a real name while the thieves have not. In our culture it's unusual that anonymous people could challenge a decent member on moral grounds. No idea why you have it the other way round?SzG wrote:You fail to stop calling it stealth. Got some evidence finally?Graham Banks wrote:Red text added by me.Why worry about my neighbour's old car when I have my own and better one which I received as stolen goods?
We have not the same moral. I'm an observer and describe why someone of the group is on top of anonymous people. If Gabor cant accept that and if he insinuated that anonymous thieves have same rights and moral then I contradict him. Personally I dont claim anything for myself. I'm not superior to Gabor or equal to you. I'm just an observer. That is also why I dont agree with someone like you all the time, in special if you support wrong issues. Well, it's seldom that I can understand when something is wrong. But I can judge if people with wrong moral are supported by the group which is a fatal moral. You just cant support anonymous people who attack members of the group. There is much hypocrisy when it's forbidden to publish links for downloading but the names of the alleged clones are being published.Graham Banks wrote:
I do respect Gabor highly. It's just that we have different opinions on this issue.
However, I do appreciate your support Rolf.
Cheers,
Graham.
It is not new that in CCC some people have the right to blame others and to acuse them without any proof.Graham Banks wrote:Red text added by me.slobo wrote:Definitely you did not get it.Graham Banks wrote:Why worry about your own car when you can steal your neighbour's better one?slobo wrote: Who would need Rybka 3´s code to be open if we already have the open code of an engine 60-65 elo points stronger than Rybka 3?
The correct understanding of my post would result into the following statement:
Why worry about my neighbour's old car when I have my own and better one which I received as stolen goods?
Query --could it not be called 'detrimental reliance' in regard to the slighted Rybka 3 fans that purchased the engine with 'Updates' which were not delivered 
If I were advised (by the Rybka representatives) that an improved R3+ was in the offing and I then purchased said R3 with this expectation for purposes of utilizing the R3+ to proof my opening book....and said updates were NOT delivered in a 'reasonable' time period What ethical situation do we have then in terms of a R3+ clone IF Vas were to release the much touted R3+ would I be comitting murder if I then subsequently --ahem--killed my clone.... Well, with some good will of yours, you could see Ippolit´s and Robolito´s arrival as a fulfillment of that atualization promise.Nimzovik wrote:Honesty...Yes.... Peculiar use of this term in this rather particular situation.