Stock 1.7 (100 Games)

[AdminX]

Blitz 5m

Q9000
Fritz 12 GUI
Mybook 12
2 Cores Each
1024 Hash
Permanent brain On

Stockfish 1.7 64bit
+45/=26/-29 58.00% 58.0 / 100

Naum 4.2 64bit
+29/=26/-45 42.00% 42.0 / 100

(100 games)

Games Download

[swami]

Blitz 5m

Q9000
Fritz 12 GUI
Mybook 12
2 Cores Each
1024 Hash
Permanent brain On

Stockfish 1.7 64bit
+45/=26/-29 58.00% 58.0 / 100

Naum 4.2 64bit
+29/=26/-45 42.00% 42.0 / 100

(100 games)

Games Download

Interesting, Thanks.

Would like to see the same 100 games match between Stockfish 1.7 and Rybka 3!

[beram]

Against Firebird a Rybkalike result 40%, next match will be against Rybka 3

Dualcore T4300 2100MHZ, Blitz 4m+2s Privatbook, 25 positions

1 FireBird 1.2 x64 +20/=20/-10 60.00% 30.0/50
2 Stockfish 1.7 JA 64bit +10/=20/-20 40.00% 20.0/50

[JWorcester]

1'+1"

102 games vs Rybka 3 (51 positions)

Dual core E8400 4.0GHz Ponder Off

1 Stockfish 1.7 JA [Dual] +31/-28/=43 51.47% 52.5/102
2 Rybka 3 32-bit +28/-31/=43 48.53% 49.5/102

Here's one truly impressive game from the 102 played.

[Event "1 Minutes/Game + 1 Seconds/Move"]
[Site "Engine Match"]
[Date "2010.04.09"]
[Round "58"]
[White "Rybka 3 32-bit"]
[Black "Stockfish 1.7 JA [Dual]"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B81"]
[PlyCount "66"]
[EventDate "2010.??.??"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 e6 6. Be3 a6 7. g4 h6 8. Bg2
Nc6 9. h3 Ne5 10. Qe2 g5 11. O-O-O Bd7 12. Nf3 Ng6 13. Kb1 Rc8 14. Bd2 Bg7 15.
Nd4 b5 16. a3 Qb6 17. Be3 Rxc3 18. bxc3 Qc7 {+0.24/16 3s} 19. Kb2 {+0.31/10 2s
(Bd2)} O-O {-0.48/16 3s (Ne5)} 20. Bd2 {+0.06/11 13s} Rc8 {-0.68/16 3s} 21. Kb1
{0.00/10 3s (Ka2)} Nh4 {-0.84/17 3s (Qa5)} 22. f3 {-0.12/11 5s} Nxe4 {-1.53/17
2s (Be8)} 23. fxe4 {-0.55/13 16s (Qxe4)} Bxd4 {-1.77/17 3s} 24. Bxg5 {-0.55/13
11s (Bf1)} Be5 {-4.88/16 2s (Bg7)} 25. Bd2 {-1.22/10 4s} Qa5 {-4.64/18 2s (b4)}
26. Rhf1 {-0.70/9 2s (Qf2)} Qxa3 {-5.73/19 3s (Nxg2)} 27. Qf2 {-3.08/8 1s (Be1)
} Nf5 {-14.66/16 2s (f6)} 28. gxf5 {-1.80/8 1s (Qf4)} Rc4 {-M7/13 0s (Rxc3)}
29. Qg3+ {-M13/8 2s} Bxg3 {-M6/9 0s} 30. Rf4 {-M11/7 0s (Bc1)} Ra4 {-M4/6 0s
(Bxf4)} 31. Rg4+ {-M4/3 0s} Kh8 {-M3/6 0s} 32. Rg8+ {-M3/3 0s} Kxg8 {-M2/6 0s}
33. Bg5 {-M2/3 0s (fxe6)} Qa1# {-M1/6 0s} 0-1

[AdminX]

For Swami,

Your wish is granted, 100 more!

Blitz 5m

Q9000
Fritz 12 GUI
Mybook 21.2
2 Cores Each
1024 Hash
Ponder On

Rybka 3 64bit
+49/=15/-36 56.50% 56.5 / 100

Stockfish 1.7 64bit
+36/=15/-49 43.50% 43.5 / 100

(100 Games)

Games Download

[swami]

Thanks, Ted. Much appreciated!

I'm beginning to think that Rybka is stockfish's nemesis. Stockfish doesn't particularly like Rybka's playing style.

[Uri Blass]

Thanks, Ted. Much appreciated!

I'm beginning to think that Rybka is stockfish's nemesis. Stockfish doesn't particularly like Rybka's playing style.

No
My opinion is that
fast time control is stockfish's nemesis

Stockfish does not like it

In my games(of course not enough games and I do not plan to play enough games)
Rybka3 32 bit 1 cpu won against Stockfish 32 bits one cpu 28-22 at 1+1 time control
Stockfish took revenge by winning 3-1 at 5+5 time control

Uri