21st Amateur Series Division 5

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

Mincho Georgiev
Posts: 454
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 6:44 pm
Location: Bulgaria

Re: Final Standings

Post by Mincho Georgiev »

In fact I like very much both nano- and picoszachy. Pawny's holiday in division 4 may not last long though, I don't know. So Piotr, soon they could switch places again. :)
Adam Hair
Posts: 3226
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:31 pm
Location: Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina

Re: Final Standings

Post by Adam Hair »

Graham Banks wrote:
Piotr Cichy wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:The playoff match between Pawny 0.2 and NanoSzachy 3.8 is in progress. Pawny currently leads by 5.0-3.0, but NanoSzachy could be winning Game 9.
Pawny prevailed by 6.0-4.0, so will play in Division 4 of the next series.
A pity for nanoSzachy :cry: However, I don't plan to release new version in near future, so it probably will go down in ranking lists.

Graham, could you consider testing pikoSzachy instead of nanoSzachy? I think it is quite interesting engine because of it's size - only 10KB, and is not much weaker than nano.
I'll ask the CCRL blitz testers if they could test pikoSzachy for you if they haven't already done so.
I'm having difficulty keeping up with all the new engine releases at present, but I'll try to test pikoSzachy at some stage too.

Cheers,
Graham.
As soon I am through testing Pawny, I will start a gauntlet for pikoSzachy.
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44196
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Final Standings

Post by Graham Banks »

Adam Hair wrote:As soon I am through testing Pawny, I will start a gauntlet for pikoSzachy.
Thanks Adam. :D
gbanksnz at gmail.com