Fritz 12 Gui
Tablebase 5 man
64Mb Hash
TC: Game in 10 seconds.
1 Houdini 1.5 w32 2500 +182 +1195/=355/-302 74.11% 1372.5/1852
2 Deep Rybka 4 w32 2500 -182 +302/=355/-1195 25.89% 479.5/1852
Hyper Bullet Match: Houdini 1.5 Vs Rybka 4 (1852 Games)
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 2727
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm
-
- Posts: 3241
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:29 pm
- Full name: lucasart
Re: Hyper Bullet Match: Houdini 1.5 Vs Rybka 4 (1852 Games)
10 sec and no inc ? this is just silly...mwyoung wrote:Fritz 12 Gui
Tablebase 5 man
64Mb Hash
TC: Game in 10 seconds.
1 Houdini 1.5 w32 2500 +182 +1195/=355/-302 74.11% 1372.5/1852
2 Deep Rybka 4 w32 2500 -182 +302/=355/-1195 25.89% 479.5/1852
-
- Posts: 2876
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:53 pm
- Location: Denmark
- Full name: Damir Desevac
Re: Hyper Bullet Match: Houdini 1.5 Vs Rybka 4 (1852 Games)
but the result speak for itself, don't you think ?...
even with time increment, I doubt Rybka would have played any better than it already has..


even with time increment, I doubt Rybka would have played any better than it already has..
-
- Posts: 44230
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Hyper Bullet Match: Houdini 1.5 Vs Rybka 4 (1852 Games)
There is no doubt that Houdini 1.5 is stronger than Rybka 4 by at least 50 ELO. Anybody who can't see that is denying the obvious.Damir wrote:but the result speak for itself, don't you think ?...![]()
![]()
even with time increment, I doubt Rybka would have played any better than it already has..
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 4190
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:47 am
Re: Hyper Bullet Match: Houdini 1.5 Vs Rybka 4 (1852 Games)
Rybka TM is so crappy that even with the best settings that CCRL (pardon me, I mean Rybka) testers have found it's still like 10% worse in hyper bullet than in regular TC against any serious engine.mwyoung wrote:Fritz 12 Gui
Tablebase 5 man
64Mb Hash
TC: Game in 10 seconds.
1 Houdini 1.5 w32 2500 +182 +1195/=355/-302 74.11% 1372.5/1852
2 Deep Rybka 4 w32 2500 -182 +302/=355/-1195 25.89% 479.5/1852
With default settings is 20% worse. That speaks volumes about Rybka author.
Obvious motive is just another obfuscation. Since most engine authors do their engine tuning in hyper bullet, Vas found a "genious" way to screw them.
Moreover that should give some (false of course) impression that Rybka is better as the TCs increase, because it has some "enigmatic" knowledge, when in reality it has mediocre evaluation but greatly tuned.
-
- Posts: 2876
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:53 pm
- Location: Denmark
- Full name: Damir Desevac
Re: Hyper Bullet Match: Houdini 1.5 Vs Rybka 4 (1852 Games)
Judging from the result above, I would say it is much much more than +50 elo increase.Graham Banks wrote:There is no doubt that Houdini 1.5 is stronger than Rybka 4 by at least 50 ELO. Anybody who can't see that is denying the obvious.Damir wrote:but the result speak for itself, don't you think ?...![]()
![]()
even with time increment, I doubt Rybka would have played any better than it already has..