Test Position: Rossolimo-Nestler, Venice 1954

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

MikeGL
Posts: 1010
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 2:49 pm

Re: Test Position: Rossolimo-Nestler, Venice 1954

Post by MikeGL »

[D] r4rk1/2q2p1p/p1b2p2/1p2p3/1P2P3/P1NBB3/2P1Q1PP/6K1 w - - 0 3

Louis, according to Steffan's line above his Zappa Mexico II has the following lines, but Bb6 followed by Ba5 is strange as this puts the B out of play.

3. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 4. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 5. e4xd5 f6-f5 6. Bd3xf5 f7-f6 7. d5-d6 Qc7-f7 8. Qh5xf7 Rf8xf7 9. Be3-b6 Rf7-b7 10. Bb6-a5 Ra8-a7 11. Bf5-c8 Rb7-g7
= (0.46) Depth: 25/69 00:15:18.74 25852750kN (28139 KN/s, 33826985 splits, 1607907 aborts)
Sorgenkind

Re: Test Position: Rossolimo-Nestler, Venice 1954

Post by Sorgenkind »

Score dropped back to 0 again, maybe draw was the correct result after all. :-)

1. Rf2xf6 Be7xf6 2. Rf1xf6 g7xf6 3. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 4. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 5. e4xd5 f6-f5 6. Bd3xf5 f7-f6 7. d5-d6 Qc7-f7 8. Qh5xf7 Rf8xf7 9. Be3-b6 Rf7-b7 10. Bb6-a5 Ra8-a7 11. Bf5-c8 Rb7-g7
= (0.46) Depth: 25/69 00:17:36.83 29731131kN (28132 KN/s, 39237276 splits, 1846638 aborts)
1. Rf2xf6 Be7xf6 2. Rf1xf6 g7xf6 3. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 4. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 5. Qh5-h6 Rf8-g8 6. Qh6xf6 Rg8-g7 7. Be3-h6 Ra8-g8 8. e4xd5 Qc7-c3 9. d5-d6 Qc3-a1 10. Kg1-f2 Qa1-d4 11. Kf2-f1 Qd4-d5 12. Bh6xg7 Rg8xg7 13. Kf1-e1 e5-e4 14. Qf6-d8
= (0.00) Depth: 26/71 00:20:52.67 36550245kN (29178 KN/s, 43282847 splits, 2017074 aborts)
1. Rf2xf6 Be7xf6 2. Rf1xf6 g7xf6 3. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 4. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 5. Qh5-h6 Rf8-g8 6. Qh6xf6 Rg8-g7 7. Be3-h6 Ra8-g8 8. e4xd5 Qc7-c3 9. d5-d6 Qc3-a1 10. Kg1-f2 Qa1-d4 11. Kf2-f1 Qd4-d5 12. Bh6xg7 Rg8xg7 13. Kf1-e1 e5-e4 14. Qf6-d8
= (0.00) Depth: 26/71 01:29:11.14 155323118kN (29026 KN/s, 88751513 splits, 4199044 aborts)
1. Rf2xf6 Be7xf6 2. Rf1xf6 g7xf6 3. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 4. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 5. Qh5-h6 Rf8-g8 6. Qh6xf6 Rg8-g7 7. Be3-h6 Ra8-g8 8. e4xd5 Qc7-c3 9. d5-d6 Qc3-a1 10. Kg1-f2 Qa1-d4 11. Kf2-f1 Qd4-d5 12. c2-c3 Qd5xd3
= (0.00) Depth: 27/73 01:33:55.53 164593173kN (29206 KN/s, 93418664 splits, 4395411 aborts)

Best regards,
Steffen
zullil
Posts: 6442
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
Location: PA USA
Full name: Louis Zulli

Re: Test Position: Rossolimo-Nestler, Venice 1954

Post by zullil »

A long search by Critter (though only on 8 cores, not 48 :shock:) scored this position as 0 too.

[D]r4rk1/2q2p1p/p1b2p2/1p2p3/1P2P3/P1NBB3/2P1Q1PP/6K1 w - - 0 3
Sorgenkind

Re: Test Position: Rossolimo-Nestler, Venice 1954

Post by Sorgenkind »

Hi Louis!

Zappa says it's an even position:

1. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 2. Qe2-g4 Kg8-h8 3. Qg4-f5 Qc7-c8 4. Qf5xf6 Kh8-g8 5. Qf6-g5 Kg8-h8 6. Qg5-f6
= (0.00) Depth: 17/53 00:00:06.17 61781kN (10007 KN/s, 617797 splits, 31648 aborts)
1. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 2. Qe2-g4 Kg8-h8 3. Qg4-f5 Qc7-c8 4. Qf5xf6 Kh8-g8 5. Qf6-g5 Kg8-h8 6. Qg5-f6
= (0.00) Depth: 18/55 00:00:07.44 80235kN (10773 KN/s, 729730 splits, 36981 aborts)
1. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 2. Qe2-g4 Kg8-h8 3. Qg4-f5 Qc7-c8 4. Qf5xf6 Kh8-g8 5. Qf6-g5 Kg8-h8 6. Qg5-f6
= (0.00) Depth: 18/55 00:00:08.84 103793kN (11730 KN/s, 874712 splits, 44024 aborts)
1. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 2. e4xd5 f6-f5 3. Bd3xf5 f7-f6 4. Be3-c5 Kg8-h8 5. Qe2-f3 Ra8-d8 6. Bf5-e6 Qc7-g7 7. Bc5xf8 Qg7xf8 8. c2-c4 b5xc4
= (0.19) Depth: 19/57 00:00:12.71 167508kN (13179 KN/s, 1278063 splits, 63193 aborts)
1. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 2. e4xd5 f6-f5 3. Bd3xf5 f7-f6 4. Be3-c5 Kg8-h8 5. Qe2-f3 Ra8-d8 6. Bf5-e6 Qc7-g7 7. Bc5xf8 Qg7xf8 8. c2-c4 b5xc4
= (0.19) Depth: 19/57 00:00:21.41 370767kN (17317 KN/s, 2431738 splits, 102094 aborts)
1. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 2. e4xd5 f6-f5 3. Bd3xf5 Rf8-d8 4. Qe2-g4 Kg8-h8 5. Qg4-h4 f7-f6 6. Qh4xf6 Qc7-g7 7. Qf6-e6 Rd8-e8 8. Qe6-c6 Re8-f8 9. d5-d6 Ra8-d8 10. Qc6xa6 Rf8xf5 11. Qa6xb5 Rd8xd6
= (0.12) Depth: 20/59 00:00:25.72 476093kN (18506 KN/s, 2922531 splits, 123704 aborts)
1. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 2. e4xd5 f6-f5 3. Bd3xf5 Rf8-d8 4. Qe2-g4 Kg8-h8 5. Qg4-h4 f7-f6 6. Qh4xf6 Qc7-g7 7. Qf6-e6 Rd8-e8 8. Qe6-c6 Re8-f8 9. d5-d6 Ra8-d8 10. Qc6xa6 Rf8xf5 11. Qa6xb5 Rd8xd6
= (0.12) Depth: 20/59 00:00:31.73 631080kN (19886 KN/s, 3597757 splits, 146533 aborts)
1. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 2. e4xd5 f6-f5 3. Bd3xf5 Rf8-d8 4. Qe2-g4 Kg8-h8 5. Bf5xh7 Kh8xh7 6. Qg4-h5 Kh7-g7 7. Be3-h6 Kg7-h8 8. Bh6-e3 Kh8-g8 9. Qh5-g5 Kg8-h8 10. Qg5-h5
= (0.00) Depth: 21/61 00:00:40.56 859247kN (21181 KN/s, 4356989 splits, 181700 aborts)
1. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 2. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 3. e4xd5 f6-f5 4. Bd3xf5 f7-f6 5. d5-d6 Qc7-f7 6. Qh5xf7 Rf8xf7 7. Be3-b6 Ra8-b8 8. Bb6-a5 Rb8-b7 9. Bf5-c8 Rb7-d7 10. Bc8xd7 Rf7xd7
= (0.16) Depth: 21/61 00:00:51.47 1154265kN (22422 KN/s, 5335505 splits, 214249 aborts)
1. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 2. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 3. e4xd5 f6-f5 4. Bd3xf5 f7-f6 5. d5-d6 Qc7-f7 6. Qh5xf7 Rf8xf7 7. Be3-b6 Ra8-b8 8. Bb6-a5 Rb8-b7 9. Bf5-c8 Rb7-d7 10. Bc8xd7 Rf7xd7
= (0.16) Depth: 21/61 00:00:55.17 1227909kN (22256 KN/s, 5737063 splits, 226702 aborts)
1. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 2. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 3. e4xd5 f6-f5 4. Bd3xf5 f7-f6 5. d5-d6 Qc7-f7 6. Qh5-h3 Qf7-b7 7. Qh3-h4 Ra8-d8 8. Be3-c5 Qb7-f7 9. Qh4-h3 Qf7-b7 10. Qh3-h4
= (0.00) Depth: 22/63 00:01:04.37 1543647kN (23980 KN/s, 6276618 splits, 245352 aborts)
1. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 2. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 3. e4xd5 f6-f5 4. Bd3xf5 f7-f6 5. d5-d6 Qc7-f7 6. Qh5-h3 Qf7-b7 7. Qh3-h4 Ra8-d8 8. Be3-c5 Qb7-f7 9. Qh4-h3 Qf7-b7 10. Qh3-h4
= (0.00) Depth: 22/63 00:01:23.25 2088060kN (25081 KN/s, 7584282 splits, 302829 aborts)
1. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 2. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 3. Qh5-f5 Qc7-c8 4. Qf5xf6 Kh8-g8 5. Qf6-g5 Kg8-h8 6. Qg5-f6
= (0.00) Depth: 23/65 00:01:39.11 2620895kN (26443 KN/s, 8384403 splits, 332946 aborts)
1. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 2. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 3. Qh5-f5 Qc7-c8 4. Qf5xf6 Kh8-g8 5. Qf6-g5 Kg8-h8 6. Qg5-f6
= (0.00) Depth: 23/65 00:02:09.05 3442889kN (26679 KN/s, 10391942 splits, 425025 aborts)
1. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 2. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 3. Qh5-f5 Qc7-c8 4. Qf5xf6 Kh8-g8 5. Qf6-g5 Kg8-h8 6. Qg5-f6
= (0.00) Depth: 24/67 00:02:32.33 4277274kN (28079 KN/s, 11399535 splits, 458627 aborts)
1. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 2. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 3. Qh5-f5 Qc7-c8 4. Qf5xf6 Kh8-g8 5. Qf6-g5 Kg8-h8 6. Qg5-f6
= (0.00) Depth: 24/67 00:03:41.70 6350961kN (28646 KN/s, 15088985 splits, 618195 aborts)
1. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 2. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 3. Qh5-f5 Qc7-c8 4. Qf5xf6 Kh8-g8 5. Qf6-g5 Kg8-h8 6. Qg5-f6
= (0.00) Depth: 25/69 00:04:23.63 7908495kN (29997 KN/s, 16427991 splits, 657616 aborts)
1. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 2. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 3. Qh5-f5 Qc7-c8 4. Qf5xf6 Kh8-g8 5. Qf6-g5 Kg8-h8 6. Qg5-f6
= (0.00) Depth: 25/69 00:06:01.81 10894705kN (30111 KN/s, 21063531 splits, 859409 aborts)
1. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 2. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 3. Qh5-f5 Qc7-c8 4. Qf5xf6 Kh8-g8 5. Qf6-g5 Kg8-h8 6. Qg5-f6
= (0.00) Depth: 26/71 00:07:26.42 14080307kN (31540 KN/s, 23134989 splits, 924548 aborts)
1. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 2. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 3. Qh5-f5 Qc7-c8 4. Qf5xf6 Kh8-g8 5. Qf6-g5 Kg8-h8 6. Qg5-f6
= (0.00) Depth: 26/71 00:10:41.61 20113842kN (31349 KN/s, 30836639 splits, 1251207 aborts)
1. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 2. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 3. Qh5-f5 Qc7-c8 4. Qf5xf6 Kh8-g8 5. Qf6-g5 Kg8-h8 6. Qg5-f6
= (0.00) Depth: 27/73 00:13:24.48 26305628kN (32699 KN/s, 34305045 splits, 1365901 aborts)
1. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 2. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 3. Qh5-f5 Qc7-c8 4. Qf5xf6 Kh8-g8 5. Qf6-g5 Kg8-h8 6. Qg5-f6
= (0.00) Depth: 27/73 00:19:09.07 37163798kN (32342 KN/s, 46092066 splits, 1850157 aborts)
1. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 2. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 3. Qh5-f5 Qc7-c8 4. Qf5xf6 Kh8-g8 5. Qf6-g5 Kg8-h8 6. Qg5-f6
= (0.00) Depth: 28/75 00:24:51.67 50062441kN (33561 KN/s, 52120616 splits, 2051711 aborts)
1. Qe2-h5 Kg8-h8 2. Nc3-d5 Bc6xd5 3. Qh5-f5 Qc7-c8 4. Qf5xf6 Kh8-g8 5. Qf6-g5 Kg8-h8 6. Qg5-f6
= (0.00) Depth: 28/75 00:37:34.69 74167189kN (32894 KN/s, 70194702 splits, 2765103 aborts)

Best regards,
Steffen
zullil
Posts: 6442
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
Location: PA USA
Full name: Louis Zulli

Re: Test Position: Rossolimo-Nestler, Venice 1954

Post by zullil »

Thanks.

I was suggesting that Steffen start a new search from the post-sac position, to try to get a bit deeper (and to possibly find a different line due to the non-deterministic nature of parallel searches).
User avatar
Eelco de Groot
Posts: 4576
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:40 am
Full name:   

Re: Test Position: Rossolimo-Nestler, Venice 1954

Post by Eelco de Groot »

zullil wrote:[D]r4rk1/2q2p1p/p1b2p2/1p2p3/1P2P3/P1NBB3/2P1Q1PP/6K1 w - - 0 3

How do engines evaluate this?
Rainbow Serpent evaluates it as very close to zero, after a while


r4rk1/2q2p1p/p1b2p2/1p2p3/1P2P3/P1NBB3/2P1Q1PP/6K1 w - -

Engine: eXperimental Tommy Cooper - Rainbow Serpent Build 291 (Athlon 2009 MHz, 256 MB)
By Tord Romstad, Marco Costalba, Joona Kiiski

1/01 0:00 +1.21 1.Qg4+ (500) 1

2/06 0:00 +1.61 1.Qg4+ Kh8 2.Nd5 Bxd5 3.exd5 Qc3 (1.639) 5

3/05 0:00 +1.37 1.Qg4+ Kh8 2.Qh4 Qe7 3.Qh6 (8.550) 27

4/10 0:00 +1.61 1.Qg4+ Kh8 2.Qh4 Rg8 3.Qxf6+ Rg7
4.Nd5 Bxd5 5.exd5 Qd7 (16.738) 51

5/10 0:00 +1.49 1.Qg4+ Kh8 2.Qh4 Rg8 3.Qxf6+ Rg7
4.Nd5 Bxd5 5.exd5 Qd7 (22.382) 65

6/10 0:00 +1.17-- 1.Qg4+ Kh8 2.Qh4 Rg8 3.Qxf6+ Rg7
4.Nd5 Bxd5 5.exd5 Qd7 (72.667) 160

6/05 0:00 +1.57 1.Qh5 Qd8 2.Nd5 Bxd5 3.exd5 (102.543) 199

7/07 0:00 +1.73 1.Qh5 Rfc8 2.Nd5 Bxd5 3.exd5 e4
4.Bxe4 (145.573) 239

8/10 0:01 +1.52 1.Qh5 Rae8 2.Qh6 Qd6 3.Bc5 Qd8 4.Nd5 Bxd5
5.exd5 e4 (396.140) 352

9/12 0:02 +1.19-- 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Nd5 Bxd5 3.exd5 e4
4.Qg4+ Kh8 5.Bxe4 Rxe4 6.Qxe4 Rg8 (934.622) 418

9/08 0:03 +1.20 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Bc5 Qd7 3.Qh4 Re7
4.Qxf6 Re6 (1.597.789) 450

10/13 0:04 +1.23 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Bc5 Kh8 3.Qh4 Rg8 4.Nd5 Bxd5
5.exd5 Rg7 6.Qxf6 e4 7.Bxe4 (1.812.709) 453

11/10 0:05 +1.05 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Qh6 Re6 3.Qh4 Rae8
4.Nd5 Bxd5 5.exd5 e4 (2.610.475) 466

12/08 0:10 +0.76-- 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Qg4+ Kh8 3.Nd5 Bxd5
4.exd5 Rg8 (4.808.407) 480

12/14 0:14 +0.47 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.h3 Bb7 3.Nd5 Bxd5
4.exd5 e4 5.Qg4+ Kh8 6.Bxe4 Rxe4
7.Qxe4 Rg8 (6.954.883) 488

13/11 0:24 +0.48 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Bc5 Qd7 3.Qh4 Rac8
4.Be3 Ba8 5.Bh6 Rxc3 6.Qg3+ (12.059.165) 495

14/15 0:31 +0.50 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Bc5 Qd7 3.Qh4 Rac8
4.Be3 Qe6 5.a4 Kh8 6.Nd5 Rg8 7.g3 Rg5
8.axb5 (15.567.310) 497

15/18 0:38 +0.35 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Qg4+ Kh8 3.Qh4 Rg8
4.Qxf6+ Rg7 5.g3 Qd7 6.Bh6 Rag8
7.Kf1 Qh3+ 8.Ke1 Bd7 9.Bxg7+ Rxg7 (19.290.731) 495

16/20 1:05 +0.19-- 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Qg4+ Kh8 3.Qh4 Rg8
4.Qxf6+ Rg7 5.g3 Qd7 6.Bh6 Rag8
7.Kf1 Qh3+ 8.Ke1 Qxh2 9.Qxc6 Qxg3+
10.Kd2 Rg6 (32.229.733) 490

16/16 1:31 +0.05 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Ne2 Bd7 3.Qh4 Qd8 4.Nc3 f5
5.Qg3+ Kh8 6.exf5 Qf6 7.Be4 Rg8
8.Qh3 Rac8 (44.987.104) 493

17/23 1:45 +0.06 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Nd5 Bxd5 3.exd5 e4
4.Qg4+ Kh8 5.Bd4 Qd6 6.Bxe4 h6 7.Qh4 Rxe4
8.Bxf6+ Kg8 9.Qxh6 Re1+ 10.Kf2 Re2+
11.Kxe2 Re8+ 12.Kf2 (52.473.715) 496

18/18 1:52 +0.08 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Qh4 Bb7 3.Bc5 Qd7 4.Nd5 Bxd5
5.exd5 e4 6.Qg3+ Kh8 7.Qf4 Kg8
8.Bxe4 Rxe4 9.Qxe4 Re8 (55.912.741) 497

19/16 1:59 +0.08 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Qh4 Bb7 3.Nd5 Bxd5
4.exd5 e4 5.Qg4+ Kh8 6.Bxe4 Rxe4
7.Qxe4 Qe5 8.Qxe5 fxe5 (59.747.941) 498

20/16 2:42 +0.01 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.h3 Kh8 3.Qh6 Rg8
4.Qxf6+ Rg7 5.g4 Kg8 6.Nd5 Bxd5
7.exd5 e4 8.d6 Qd8 (81.187.182) 498

21/24 4:17 0.00 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.h3 Kh8 3.Qh4 Rg8
4.Qxf6+ Rg7 5.Nd5 Bxd5 6.Bh6 Rag8
7.exd5 e4 8.Bxg7+ Rxg7 9.Bxe4 Qa7+
10.Kh2 Qe3 11.Qd8+ Rg8 12.Qf6+ Rg7 (127.068.075) 493

22/16 7:01 0.00 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Nd5 Bxd5 3.exd5 e4
4.Qg4+ Kh8 5.Bd4 Qd6 6.Qh4 Re6
7.Bxe4 Rxe4 8.Qxe4 Rg8 (209.136.770) 496

23/16 8:59 0.00 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Nd5 Bxd5 3.exd5 e4
4.Qg4+ Kh8 5.Bd4 Qd6 6.Qh4 Re6
7.Bxe4 Rxe4 8.Qxe4 Rg8 (265.016.402) 491

24/16 9:20 0.00 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Nd5 Bxd5 3.exd5 e4
4.Qg4+ Kh8 5.Bd4 Qd6 6.Qh4 Re6
7.Bxe4 Rxe4 8.Qxe4 Rg8 (274.838.833) 490

25/16 9:49 0.00 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Nd5 Bxd5 3.exd5 e4
4.Qg4+ Kh8 5.Bd4 Qd6 6.Qh4 Re6
7.Bxe4 Rxe4 8.Qxe4 Rg8 (288.791.773) 490

26/24 22:38 0.00 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Qh4 Bb7 3.a4 Qd8 4.Nd5 Bxd5
5.exd5 e4 6.Bxe4 Rxe4 7.Qxe4 Qd6
8.Qg4+ Kh8 9.Bd4 h6 10.axb5 axb5
11.Qf5 Kg7 12.Qg4+ Kh8 (657.951.223) 484

27/16 28:51 0.00 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Qh4 Bb7 3.a4 Qd8 4.Nd5 Bxd5
5.exd5 e4 6.Bxe4 Rxe4 7.Qxe4 Qd6
8.Qg4+ Kh8 (835.698.448) 482

28/16 41:59 0.00 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Qh4 Bb7 3.Nd5 Bxd5
4.exd5 e4 5.Qg4+ Kh8 6.Bd4 Qd6 7.Qh4 Re6
8.Bxe4 Rxe4 (1.221.019.358) 484

29/16 56:15 0.00 1.Qh5 Rfe8 2.Qh4 Bb7 3.Nd5 Bxd5
4.exd5 e4 5.Qg4+ Kh8 6.Bd4 Qd6 7.Qh4 Re6
8.Bxe4 Rxe4 {
[D]r6k/5p1p/p2q1p2/1p1P4/1P1Br2Q/P7/2P3PP/6K1 w - - 0 1} (1.641.042.593) 486
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
User avatar
Mike S.
Posts: 1480
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:33 am

Re: Test Position: Rossolimo-Nestler, Venice 1954

Post by Mike S. »

Not an avoid sac test specifically, but the best general avoid move test I know of is the Swiss Test by Walter Eigenmann:

http://glareanverlag.wordpress.com/category/swiss-test/

(download link near bottom of page)

It consits of 64 positions. Maybe you find at least some useful "avoid sac" positions among these.
Regards, Mike