iCE 0.2 Gauntlets (CCRL 40/40)

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
Aser Huerga
Posts: 812
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:09 am
Location: Spain

iCE 0.2 Gauntlets (CCRL 40/40)

Post by Aser Huerga »

iCE 0.2 Gauntlets

Hardware: Hardware: Intel i7 950 3.07GHz 6GB RAM
Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP 64 Bit Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 3790)
All engines 1 CPU (SSE versions when available)
Arena 2.0.1 GUI
128MB Hash Tables
3-4-5 EGTBs
Ponder off
Book ECO_500_Most_Played (from the last 30 years, based on Norm Pollock collections), each pair plays the same position with switched colours.
40 moves in 23 minutes repeating (adapted to the CCRL 40/40 standard)

Code: Select all

1   iCE 0.2               -2475- 176.0/264
2   Hermann 2.8 64-bit     2615  18.0/24
3   Delphil 2.7            2569  15.5/24
4   Neurosis 2.5           2301  10.0/24
5   KMTChess 1.2.1 64-bit  2321  8.5/24
6   Gibbon 2.42c           2314  7.0/24
7   Atak 6.8               2341  6.0/24  699.00
8   Adam 3.3               2321  6.0/24  699.00
9   OBender 3.2.4.2        2286  5.5/24
10  Kurt 0.9.2.2 64-bit    2292  4.5/24
11  ECE 11.01              2291  4.0/24
12  NagaSkaki 5.12         2266  3.0/24
(All ELOs referred to the last Chess Computer Rating List when tournament starts, except -XXXX- one, wich is referred to performance).

Games: http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... p?id=23871
tpetzke
Posts: 686
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:57 pm
Location: Germany

Re: iCE 0.2 Gauntlets (CCRL 40/40)

Post by tpetzke »

Hi, thanks for testing it. Looks like it improved a bit over version 0.1, but still a lot room for improvement left :-)

Thomas...
User avatar
Aser Huerga
Posts: 812
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:09 am
Location: Spain

Re: iCE 0.2 Gauntlets (CCRL 40/40)

Post by Aser Huerga »

tpetzke wrote:Hi, thanks for testing it. Looks like it improved a bit over version 0.1, but still a lot room for improvement left :-)

Thomas...
Yes, a bit ... more than 200 ELO gain! Congratulations, and thanks for publishing a real improvement version after some moths instead of a lot of little improvement versions, which is a pain for testing :wink: