Stockfish 111026 in test

[Jouni]

It's not only better in testsuites, but also in play. Some games in dual PC, 60/3' and no ponder:

Code: Select all

                                      
                          
1   Stockfish 111026 64bit    23.5 - 16.5 16.5 - 23.5 21.0 - 19.0 19.5 - 20.5 80.5/160
2   Stockfish 2.1.1 JA 64bit  16.5 - 23.5 12.5 - 27.5 18.0 - 22.0 20.0 - 20.0 67.0/160
3   Houdini 1.5a x64          23.5 - 16.5 27.5 - 12.5  **    51.0/80
4   Critter 1.2 64-bit        19.0 - 21.0 22.0 - 18.0   **   41.0/80
5   Rybka 4.1                 20.5 - 19.5 20.0 - 20.0    **  40.5/80

+47 ELO, Ingo how about IPON (test) run?

Jouni

[IWB]

+47 ELO, Ingo how about IPON (test) run?

Jouni

No way, they are already 3 releases later which are of course even better than this. I did not play the "test the daily Litto" game, why should I start now with Stockfish?

I stick with my principles: If they consider a version good enough for an official release - I will test it.

Bye
Ingo

PS: BTW: Too few games to convince me of anything!

[Dr.Wael Deeb]

+47 ELO, Ingo how about IPON (test) run?

Jouni

No way, they are already 3 releases later which are of course even better than this. I did not play the "test the daily Litto" game, why should I start now with Stockfish?

I stick with my principles: If they consider a version good enough for an official release - I will test it.Bye

Ingo

PS: BTW: Too few games to convince me of anything!

I happen to share the same opinion Ingo
Dr.D

[ernest]

Code: Select all

                                    
                          
1   Stockfish 111026 64bit    23.5 - 16.5 16.5 - 23.5 21.0 - 19.0 19.5 - 20.5 80.5/160
2   Stockfish 2.1.1 JA 64bit  16.5 - 23.5 12.5 - 27.5 18.0 - 22.0 20.0 - 20.0 67.0/160
3   Houdini 1.5a x64          23.5 - 16.5 27.5 - 12.5  **    51.0/80
4   Critter 1.2 64-bit        19.0 - 21.0 22.0 - 18.0   **   41.0/80
5   Rybka 4.1                 20.5 - 19.5 20.0 - 20.0    **  40.5/80

Sorry, I don't understand your table...

(who gets 23.5 - 16.5 against whom?...)

[Jouni]

Sorry it's difficult to get nice table from Fritz 12:

Code: Select all

New_stockfish

                               1             2               3             4             5  
                                                                    
1   Stockfish 111026 64bit     ***        23.5 - 16.5   16.5 - 23.5    21.0 - 19.0  19.5 - 20.5    80.5/160
2   Stockfish 2.1.1 JA 64bit  16.5 - 23.5    ***        12.5 - 27.5    18.0 - 22.0  20.0 - 20.0    67.0/160
3   Houdini 1.5a x64          23.5 - 16.5 27.5 - 12.5  
4   Critter 1.2 64-bit        19.0 - 21.0 22.0 - 18.0   
5   Rybka 4.1                 20.5 - 19.5 20.0 - 20.0    

Jouni

[ernest]

OK Jouni, best I could do:
(sorry, the end result is not as good as the "Preview", can't have both Code AND Font size... )

Code: Select all

1   Stockfish 111026 64bit        ***     23.5 - 16.5   16.5 - 23.5    21.0 - 19.0  19.5 - 20.5  80.5/160

2   Stockfish 2.1.1 JA 64bit  16.5 - 23.5     ***       12.5 - 27.5    18.0 - 22.0  20.0 - 20.0  67.0/160

3   Houdini 1.5a x64          23.5 - 16.5   		          ***	      27.5 - 12.5	

4   Critter 1.2 64-bit        19.0 - 21.0                                   ***     22.0 - 18.0   

5   Rybka 4.1                 20.5 - 19.5 20.0 - 20.0                                   ***  

[mcostalba]

+47 ELO, Ingo how about IPON (test) run?

Please don't !!!!!


These are not official releases, it is just someone that grabs the current sources and makes a compile.

Stockfish team does not support this !

I have asked Jim to not compile these active developing stuff. When we will think Stockfish will be ready for release it will be officially released with compiles by Jim, as usual. We knew there was the risk of random compiles cropping around when we chose to public the development repository on github, but nevertheless we deemed the advantages bigger than the disadvantages. I think this very clear statement by me will help clarify and possibly stop this. Of course every one is free to do whatever he wants with the sources (as long as GPL license is honored), but we have the right to say that we do not endorse this and ask testers to wait for the official ones.

[Graham Banks]

+47 ELO, Ingo how about IPON (test) run?

Jouni

No way, they are already 3 releases later which are of course even better than this. I did not play the "test the daily Litto" game, why should I start now with Stockfish?

I stick with my principles: If they consider a version good enough for an official release - I will test it.Bye

Ingo

PS: BTW: Too few games to convince me of anything!

I happen to share the same opinion Ingo
Dr.D

Same here.

[IWB]

+47 ELO, Ingo how about IPON (test) run?

Please don't !!!!!


These are not official releases, it is just someone that grabs the current sources and makes a compile.

Stockfish team does not support this !

I have asked Jim to not compile these active developing stuff. When we will think Stockfish will be ready for release it will be officially released with compiles by Jim, as usual. We knew there was the risk of random compiles cropping around when we chose to public the development repository on github, but nevertheless we deemed the advantages bigger than the disadvantages. I think this very clear statement by me will help clarify and possibly stop this. Of course every one is free to do whatever he wants with the sources (as long as GPL license is honored), but we have the right to say that we do not endorse this and ask testers to wait for the official ones.

Thanks Marco for the clear words!

I will store this link as a reply for the next requests

Hoping for a 100 Elo jump with the next official release and bye
Ingo

[MM]

+47 ELO, Ingo how about IPON (test) run?

Please don't !!!!!


These are not official releases, it is just someone that grabs the current sources and makes a compile.

Stockfish team does not support this !

I have asked Jim to not compile these active developing stuff. When we will think Stockfish will be ready for release it will be officially released with compiles by Jim, as usual. We knew there was the risk of random compiles cropping around when we chose to public the development repository on github, but nevertheless we deemed the advantages bigger than the disadvantages. I think this very clear statement by me will help clarify and possibly stop this. Of course every one is free to do whatever he wants with the sources (as long as GPL license is honored), but we have the right to say that we do not endorse this and ask testers to wait for the official ones.

Thanks Marco for the clear words!

I will store this link as a reply for the next requests

Hoping for a 100 Elo jump with the next official release and bye
Ingo

+1