For today's match we have the newest IvanHoe version release. This match features the "46f compile" by Peter Pan. Tomorrow's match will introduce the "46f compile" by KLO- to determine or at least get some idea of the comparisions between them.
With having different match lengths, I have settled on all "50 game matches" run at 40/3 repeating. All engines like this time limit, and when I wake up after 8 hours sleep, it will in general have run 46 or so of the 50 games.
I am using Rybka 4.1 as a baseline, and comparing each engine I run to that baseline. So the elo difference between 2 engines as it shows in a rating list will be determined by how each performs ag. Rybka. Example: "engine A" shows +70 elo in match with Rybka, and "engine B" shows +35 elo difference. That means in the list "engine A" will list as 35 elo stronger than "engine B".
This system is about the most UNSCIENTIFIC a person could come up with, and is full of enough holes to sink the Titanic. Just starting with too few games- it is most likely the way you would tell someone NOT to set up a testing method to form a rating list. BUT, you CAN count on reliable results from each match. That I promise.
So please no replies about how unreliable this idea is, why it is that way, and how to get reliable results. Right now I am just not interested. I am having a hell of a lot of fun- and that is all that counts. Tho I am happy to share my results. This little tiny, insignificant project is for my pleasure , and if anyone wants some kind of idea to at least start with in determining the IvanHoe versions best to download and try- it will give you a good idea about that- if nothing else.
12/9/2011
1CPU/32bit
128MB hash
Bases=NONE (Rybka used the Nalimovs)
Ponder_Learning=OFF
Perfect 12.32 book w/12-move limit
40/3 Repeating
Match=50 games
IvanHoe 46f........+42 - +17/-11/=22 - 28.0/50
Rybka 4.1............-42 - +11/-17/=22 - 22.0/50
Results using the 64bit versions will also be introduced soon to give you a broader picture or idea- an idea of exactly WHAT I haven't a clue.
So many people are wanting the PGNs- I may have to get someone to help in sending them out. Again, my address is in some of these match posts- you just have to look.
Best,
george
A New IvanHoe Version!!! v Rybka 4.1
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: A New IvanHoe Version!!! v Rybka 4.1
Thanks George
The new version of IvanHoe seems pretty strong indeed....
Testing it myself regards,
Dr.D

The new version of IvanHoe seems pretty strong indeed....
Testing it myself regards,
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:09 pm
Re: A New IvanHoe Version!!! v Rybka 4.1
This is my first test (300 games) with this strong PeterPan's version. Large pages allowed.
GUI: Fritz 12
i7 9750 3.33 Mhz.
4 cores no HT
Book: Masterbook 3.1
Time control: 2 min + 1 sec / game.
201112IvanB46bPPLP 2011
Ivanhoe B46fb x64(x4)LP - Critter 1.2 64-bit SSE4(x4) 55.0 - 45.0 +21/=68/-11 55.00%
Ivanhoe B46fb x64(x4)LP - Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64(x4) 64.0 - 36.0 +37/=54/-9 64.00%
Ivanhoe B46fb x64(x4)LP - Houdini 2.0c Pro x64(x4) 39.0 - 61.0 +12/=54/-34 39.00%
I will start repeating this test at a longer Time Control. (60 minutes per game).
Regards,
Tom.
GUI: Fritz 12
i7 9750 3.33 Mhz.
4 cores no HT
Book: Masterbook 3.1
Time control: 2 min + 1 sec / game.
201112IvanB46bPPLP 2011
Ivanhoe B46fb x64(x4)LP - Critter 1.2 64-bit SSE4(x4) 55.0 - 45.0 +21/=68/-11 55.00%
Ivanhoe B46fb x64(x4)LP - Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64(x4) 64.0 - 36.0 +37/=54/-9 64.00%
Ivanhoe B46fb x64(x4)LP - Houdini 2.0c Pro x64(x4) 39.0 - 61.0 +12/=54/-34 39.00%
I will start repeating this test at a longer Time Control. (60 minutes per game).
Regards,
Tom.
-
- Posts: 4790
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am
Re: A New IvanHoe Version!!! v Rybka 4.1
Tomcass wrote:This is my first test (300 games) with this strong PeterPan's version. Large pages allowed.
GUI: Fritz 12
i7 870 4 cores no HT
Book: Masterbook 3.1
Time control: 2 min + 1 sec / game.
201112IvanB46bPPLP 2011
Ivanhoe B46fb x64(x4)LP - Critter 1.2 64-bit SSE4(x4) 55.0 - 45.0 +21/=68/-11 55.00%
Ivanhoe B46fb x64(x4)LP - Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64(x4) 64.0 - 36.0 +37/=54/-9 64.00%
Ivanhoe B46fb x64(x4)LP - Houdini 2.0c Pro x64(x4) 39.0 - 61.0 +12/=54/-34 39.00%
I will start repeating this test at a longer Time Control. (60 minutes per game).
Regards,
Tom.
Hi Tom. Haven't seen your PGNs , but you are evidently getting extremely accurate results. So keep going- you are doing a great job. And your 60 min. matches are very important- as they will give us an idea at more different time limits. You are doing great- keep up the good work.
Best,
george
-
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:09 pm
Re: A New IvanHoe Version!!! v Rybka 4.1
Thanks George. Best regards from Barcelona.
Tom.

Tom.
-
- Posts: 4857
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IAȘI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: Silvian Rucsandescu
Re:To be or not to be..........the last !
geots wrote:For today's match we have the newest IvanHoe version release. This match features the "46f compile" by Peter Pan. Tomorrow's match will introduce the "46f compile" by KLO- to determine or at least get some idea of the comparisions between them.
george
Hello Monsieur Georges !
I don't understand why not a test for the last version of Ivan

The h version of this sublime chess engine developped in Eastern Europe and compiled in South Africa (a Mr.Izak compilation) is here:
http://www.spaadyshare.com/4FOXHFARJQ0R/Ivanhoe_46h.rar
Ivan Ivanovici Ivanovski sublime tester regards,
SilvianR

PS:tonight the results of my comparative test of Bagatur 1.2 c & d - original compiles !
-
- Posts: 4790
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am
Re:To be or not to be..........the last !
Sylwy wrote:geots wrote:For today's match we have the newest IvanHoe version release. This match features the "46f compile" by Peter Pan. Tomorrow's match will introduce the "46f compile" by KLO- to determine or at least get some idea of the comparisions between them.
george
Hello Monsieur Georges !
I don't understand why not a test for the last version of IvanHood !?!
The h version of this sublime chess engine developped in Eastern Europe and compiled in South Africa (a Mr.Izak compilation) is here:
http://www.spaadyshare.com/4FOXHFARJQ0R/Ivanhoe_46h.rar
Ivan Ivanovici Ivanovski sublime tester regards,
SilvianR
PS:tonight the results of my comparative test of Bagatur 1.2 c & d - original compiles !
Hi Ruxy. The "h versions" are coming next. I have missed doing any testing since my last results as I got a new dual core 64 bit system in. Networking them, loading stuff, and then finding out they will have to replace a video card or hard drive- or both. Waiting on a service man to arrive- I will be testing one of the "h versions" and hopefully posting results tomorrow.
Best,
george
-
- Posts: 4857
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IAȘI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: Silvian Rucsandescu
Re:To be or not to be..........the last !
Hi Maestro George !geots wrote:Sylwy wrote:geots wrote:For today's match we have the newest IvanHoe version release. This match features the "46f compile" by Peter Pan. Tomorrow's match will introduce the "46f compile" by KLO- to determine or at least get some idea of the comparisions between them.
george
Hello Monsieur Georges !
I don't understand why not a test for the last version of IvanHood !?!
The h version of this sublime chess engine developped in Eastern Europe and compiled in South Africa (a Mr.Izak compilation) is here:
http://www.spaadyshare.com/4FOXHFARJQ0R/Ivanhoe_46h.rar
Ivan Ivanovici Ivanovski sublime tester regards,
SilvianR
PS:tonight the results of my comparative test of Bagatur 1.2 c & d - original compiles !
Hi Ruxy. The "h versions" are coming next. I have missed doing any testing since my last results as I got a new dual core 64 bit system in. Networking them, loading stuff, and then finding out they will have to replace a video card or hard drive- or both. Waiting on a service man to arrive- I will be testing one of the "h versions" and hopefully posting results tomorrow.
Best,
george
From yesterday night this wonderful PP compile is under tests on 2 PCs. Unfortunately I haven't (yet

First results in this weekend !
Here are the KLO compiles of IH 46h version together with an interesting readme.pdf:
http://chess.cygnitec.com/engine/ivanho ... 999946h.7z
Regards,
SilvianR

-
- Posts: 4790
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am
Re:To be or not to be..........the last !
Sylwy wrote:Hi Maestro George !geots wrote:Sylwy wrote:geots wrote:For today's match we have the newest IvanHoe version release. This match features the "46f compile" by Peter Pan. Tomorrow's match will introduce the "46f compile" by KLO- to determine or at least get some idea of the comparisions between them.
george
Hello Monsieur Georges !
I don't understand why not a test for the last version of IvanHood !?!
The h version of this sublime chess engine developped in Eastern Europe and compiled in South Africa (a Mr.Izak compilation) is here:
http://www.spaadyshare.com/4FOXHFARJQ0R/Ivanhoe_46h.rar
Ivan Ivanovici Ivanovski sublime tester regards,
SilvianR
PS:tonight the results of my comparative test of Bagatur 1.2 c & d - original compiles !
Hi Ruxy. The "h versions" are coming next. I have missed doing any testing since my last results as I got a new dual core 64 bit system in. Networking them, loading stuff, and then finding out they will have to replace a video card or hard drive- or both. Waiting on a service man to arrive- I will be testing one of the "h versions" and hopefully posting results tomorrow.
Best,
george
From yesterday night this wonderful PP compile is under tests on 2 PCs. Unfortunately I haven't (yet) a 64 bit OS. So my tests are only 32 bit single and quad !
First results in this weekend !
Here are the KLO compiles of IH 46h version together with an interesting readme.pdf:
http://chess.cygnitec.com/engine/ivanho ... 999946h.7z
Regards,
SilvianR
Thanks Ruxy, but I have KLO's compile and PeterPan's loaded also. I will run the PP compile now, and then follow with KLO's compile, both ag. Rybka 4.1 . Then I can compare results.
Best,
george
-
- Posts: 10121
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
- Location: van buren,missouri
Re:To be or not to be..........the last !
They are all about the same George. I tested them.
Also tested Houdini 1.5 vs. Houdini 1.5-TC. They are also
the same. No improvement in 1.5-TC as reported.
Best,
Gerold.
P.S. Looking for something else to test now.
Until the clones come up with a better version i will test
something else. :_)
Also tested Houdini 1.5 vs. Houdini 1.5-TC. They are also
the same. No improvement in 1.5-TC as reported.
Best,
Gerold.
P.S. Looking for something else to test now.
Until the clones come up with a better version i will test
something else. :_)