Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.
Moderator: Ras
-
Jim Ablett
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:56 am
- Location: London, England
- Full name: Jim Ablett
Post
by Jim Ablett »
IWB wrote:
YES, I checked and tested again! This version is fine on W764 AND XP64 and it is working as SSE as it is faster than the universal x64!
BYe
Ingo
Thanks again for the valuable info,
Jim.
-
Engin
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:40 pm
- Location: Germany
- Full name: Engin Üstün
Post
by Engin »
i just made some ultra fast game test with all and previous version 2.1.1
the results show like this and there are seems no improvements....
Code: Select all
Games Completed = 156 of 100000 (Avg game length = 62.402 sec)
Settings = RR/128MB/Book/20000ms+200ms/M 600cp for 6 moves, D 150 moves/
Time = 1989 sec elapsed, 1272918 sec remaining
1. Stockfish 2.2.1 JA 64bit SSE4.2 48.5/104 8-15-81 (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=15) (D: r=68 i=8 f=1 s=1 a=3) (tpm=462.7 d=18.1 nps=1745893)
2. Stockfish 2.2.1 JA 64bit 51.0/104 15-17-72 (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=17) (D: r=58 i=7 f=1 s=1 a=5) (tpm=462.2 d=18.0 nps=1750447)
3. Stockfish 2.1.1 JA 64bit 56.5/104 21-12-71 (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=12) (D: r=60 i=7 f=0 s=0 a=4) (tpm=467.2 d=18.5 nps=1652807)
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 44556
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Post
by Graham Banks »
Thanks for your efforts Jim. Much appreciated.

gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
IGarcia
- Posts: 543
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:27 pm
Post
by IGarcia »
Thanks very much!!
BTW, great coordination to find a more compatible compile!
-
Jim Ablett
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:56 am
- Location: London, England
- Full name: Jim Ablett
Post
by Jim Ablett »
Thanks Guys

but 1% me / 99% Marco & Stockfish team.
Jim.
-
Engin
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:40 pm
- Location: Germany
- Full name: Engin Üstün
Post
by Engin »
a new quick test vs previous version shows to me that the newest one is weaker ?!
Code: Select all
Games Completed = 351 of 100000 (Avg game length = 61.563 sec)
Settings = RR/128MB/Book/20000ms+200ms/M 600cp for 6 moves, D 150 moves/
Time = 4399 sec elapsed, 1248754 sec remaining
1. Stockfish 2.2.1 JA 64bit SSE4.2 110.5/235 19-33-183 (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=33) (D: r=157 i=17 f=6 s=1 a=2) (tpm=472.9 d=17.8 nps=1760118)
2. Stockfish 2.2.1 JA 64bit 109.0/234 21-37-176 (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=37) (D: r=154 i=10 f=6 s=0 a=6) (tpm=470.2 d=18.5 nps=1765700)
3. Stockfish 2.1.1 JA 64bit 131.5/233 45-15-173 (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=15) (D: r=149 i=13 f=6 s=1 a=4) (tpm=467.9 d=19.1 nps=1694881)
-
Engin
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:40 pm
- Location: Germany
- Full name: Engin Üstün
Post
by Engin »
all games played with Littleblitzer 2.72 and 5 games pararell with 20 + 0.2 seconds, Threads=1, 128 RAM hash, without book.
but anyway "no time losses" !!!!
-
daylen
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 5:33 am
- Location: Berkeley, CA
Post
by daylen »
I just posted the Mac version.
-
MM
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:25 am
Post
by MM »
Engin wrote:all games played with Littleblitzer 2.72 and 5 games pararell with 20 + 0.2 seconds, Threads=1, 128 RAM hash, without book.
but anyway "no time losses" !!!!
Yes, no time losses, i'm running a minimatch 200 games chess960 2.2.1 sse42 vs 2.1.1, TC 10'' per game, sudden death.
Shortly the results (they won't be exciting).
Regards
MM