A privat IvanHoe 9.46bh test under CEGT-Blitz conditions

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

ThatsIt
Posts: 992
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:11 pm

Re: A privat IvanHoe 9.46bh test under CEGT-Blitz conditions

Post by ThatsIt »

THX.

Best wishes,
G.S.
User avatar
natasha
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:10 pm

Re: A privat IvanHoe 9.46bh test under CEGT-Blitz conditions

Post by natasha »

Laskos wrote:
ThatsIt wrote:Just waiting for the link !
I will do the same test under the strict conditions again.

Best wishes,
G.S.
Try this, from Peterpan. Usually Peterpan compiles of IvanHoe are the best.

http://www.spaadyshare.com/4FOXHFARJQ0R/Ivanhoe_46h.rar

Kai
+1
ThatsIt
Posts: 992
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:11 pm

Re: A privat IvanHoe 9.46bh test under CEGT-Blitz conditions

Post by ThatsIt »

Hi Georg !

A new private test is running now:
http://computerschach.forumfrei.net/t23 ... itions#392

Best wishes,
G.S.
ThatsIt
Posts: 992
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:11 pm

Re: A privat IvanHoe 9.46bh test under CEGT-Blitz conditions

Post by ThatsIt »

First results are online now.
ThatsIt
Posts: 992
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:11 pm

Re: A privat IvanHoe 9.46bh test under CEGT-Blitz conditions

Post by ThatsIt »

300 games played until now:
http://computerschach.forumfrei.net/t23 ... conditions

Best wishes,
G.S.
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44583
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: A privat IvanHoe 9.46bh test under CEGT-Blitz conditions

Post by Graham Banks »

ThatsIt wrote:300 games played until now:
http://computerschach.forumfrei.net/t23 ... conditions

Best wishes,
G.S.
The difference between the KLO-version (one of the poorest,
http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 35&t=41919) and the Peterpan-version (one of the best,
http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 02&t=41919) currently amounts +1 point.


:lol:
gbanksnz at gmail.com
ThatsIt
Posts: 992
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:11 pm

Re: A privat IvanHoe 9.46bh test under CEGT-Blitz conditions

Post by ThatsIt »

400 games played until now:
http://computerschach.forumfrei.net/t23 ... conditions

Next results Monday morning.

Best wishes,
G.S.
ThatsIt
Posts: 992
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:11 pm

Re: A privat IvanHoe 9.46bh test under CEGT-Blitz conditions

Post by ThatsIt »

... after 600 games:
http://computerschach.forumfrei.net/t23 ... itions#392

Best wishes,
G.S.
gerold
Posts: 10121
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
Location: van buren,missouri

Re: A privat IvanHoe 9.46bh test under CEGT-Blitz conditions

Post by gerold »

ThatsIt wrote:... after 600 games:
http://computerschach.forumfrei.net/t23 ... itions#392

Best wishes,
G.S.
Thanks.

Best,
Gerold.
lucasart
Posts: 3241
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:29 pm
Full name: lucasart

Re: A privat IvanHoe 9.46bh test under CEGT-Blitz conditions

Post by lucasart »

ThatsIt wrote:... after 600 games:
http://computerschach.forumfrei.net/t23 ... itions#392

Best wishes,
G.S.
you are comparing different compiles of the *same source code*, so you don't need to play any games. If there was a 1 elo difference between the two, you would need tens of thousands of games to detect it anyway.
just run the program from the command line, and type this:

Code: Select all

uci
ucinewgame
position startpos
go depth 20
quit
and compare:
* node count, score and PV should be equal otherwise one compile at least is broken
* if so, then look at the time (displayed in ms)
and now you know *without any doubt* which compile is better, and you've saved your self a huge electricity bill of testing day and night for weeks...