SCCT Rating List (25.05.2012)

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

Sedat Canbaz
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Antalya/Turkey

SCCT Rating List (25.05.2012)

Post by Sedat Canbaz »

Hello Chess Friends,


New games have been added...

Note:Ivanhoe B46fE 02 x64 6c test is planning to be started soon


Rating List:
http://www.sedatcanbaz.com/chess/scct-rating/

Conditions:
http://www.sedatcanbaz.com/chess/2838-2/

Games:
http://www.sedatcanbaz.com/chess/games/scct_3m2s.rar



Kind Regards,
Sedat Canbaz
Sedat Canbaz
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Antalya/Turkey

Re: SCCT Rating List (25.05.2012)

Post by Sedat Canbaz »

Btw,i have updated the conditions with more details:

For Better Engine Performance
•MP Engines are played between each other using 6 physical cores
•Perfect 2012b’s opening lines are frequently tuned/optimized
•Adapters (Polyglot,Wb2Uci…) are not planning to be used
•Multiply Matches (running several GUIs on same PC) are not allowed
•LIVE Broadcasting Tools (Publish Tournament on WEB) are not allowed
•During Matches:No any external software is running in the background
•It’s not installed any programs to tray in the Taskbar (Startup)
•The SCCT Tournament Computers are daily ShutDown
•Internet is disabled as protecting from any kind of threads
•No clicking with mouse,no typing…(when the tourney is active)

SCCT Rating’s Disadvantages
•Chess Engines are played with Ponder OFF (NON-Auto232 mode)
•Some opening lines of Perfect 2012b book still needs optimization
•Blitz time control has been used (not many high-quality games)
•For more reliable rating, more engines and games are needed
•No LIVE Broadcasting (external PC and webcam is missing)

SCCT Rating’s Advantages
•Engines are played with same time control on latest fast machines
•64 bit / SSE Engine versions have been played,using 6 physical cores
•It’s true that Ponder ON is better for Chess Engines,but note also that:
-Ponder OFF 6 core is approx. 140 Elo stronger than Ponder ON 1 core
•During matches:no external software is running (e.g LIVE tools or several GUIs…)
•As far as possible, the strongest modern openings are preferred and used

Time Control
•All games are played with same time control: 3 Minutes/Game + 2 Seconds/Move
*One of the most preferable blitz time controls, used in latest Chess Championships
•The overall time duration game length:equals to average 11 minutes per game
•Personally I’m not a big fan testing the engines with fast time controls
•Blitz games are less important and the results cannot be taken as very seriously
•But however, blitz is the most used and played time control in chess
•The main reason i use this blitz time control for the current rating is very simple:
-As a single tester,I have no enough free cpu time to create a reliable slow rating
•Plus blitz chess offers more possibilities to test many different engine versions

For more details:
http://www.sedatcanbaz.com/chess/2838-2/

Best Wishes,
Sedat
Sedat Canbaz
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Antalya/Turkey

Re: SCCT Rating List (25.05.2012)

Post by Sedat Canbaz »

New Engine Update:
Ivanhoe B46fE.02

More games are needed for better conclusion

But however,Ivanhoe B46fE.02 x64 seems to be a very strong compile

As we see, the current Ivanhoe B46fE.02 results are impressive so far

My Congratulations to Ivanhoe team and Izak Pretorius!

For Current Standings:
http://www.sedatcanbaz.com/chess/scct-rating/

Best Regards,
Sedat
Sedat Canbaz
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Antalya/Turkey

Re: SCCT Rating List (25.05.2012)

Post by Sedat Canbaz »

More Ivanhoe B46fE.02 x64 6c games are added

The current Ivanhoe version's start was impressive (up to 200 games),but unfortunately was not so lucky in the last 250 games

But however,as a freeware engine-very good results !

For SCCT Rating List:
http://www.sedatcanbaz.com/chess/scct-rating/



Kind Regards,
Sedat
ernest
Posts: 2053
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:30 pm

Re: SCCT Rating List (25.05.2012)

Post by ernest »

Sedat Canbaz wrote:More Ivanhoe B46fE.02 x64 6c games are added
Hi Sedat,

Actually I believe there is "a whole basket" of best Ivanhoes, where you can find
Ivanhoe B46fE.02
Ivanhoe B46fC
and perhaps George's favorite, Ivanhoe B46e
... and others (Ivanhoe 46h)

Since nobody seems to be working in depth with the Ivanhoes sources, progress is very small.
Sedat Canbaz
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Antalya/Turkey

Re: SCCT Rating List (25.05.2012)

Post by Sedat Canbaz »

ernest wrote:
Sedat Canbaz wrote:More Ivanhoe B46fE.02 x64 6c games are added
Hi Sedat,

Actually I believe there is "a whole basket" of best Ivanhoes, where you can find
Ivanhoe B46fE.02
Ivanhoe B46fC
and perhaps George's favorite, Ivanhoe B46e
... and others (Ivanhoe 46h)

Since nobody seems to be working in depth with the Ivanhoes sources, progress is very small.

Dear Ernest,

Agreed with you...

But anyway, i think mostly of the new Ivanhoe releases are becoming slightly (approx.+5 Elo) stronger than previous older Ivanhoe versions

For example, approx.5 Elo improvement is really a lot for each release (because we see oftenly new Ivanhoe versions :) )

I tested many Ivanhoe versions (the below standing is based on SCCT Auto232 Rating)

As we see,Ivanhoe 46hm performed slightly weaker than Rybka and Stockfish

But in the current SCCT Rating, Ivanhoe B46fE 02 x64 performed stronger than Rybka and Stockfish

In other words, it seems Ivanhoe B46fE 02 x64 is one of the strongest ones,but after more games it will be more clear...



Code: Select all

Rank  Name                        Elo    +    -  games  score oppo. draws
   1 Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 6c      3423   19   18  1008   70%  3261   42%
   4 Critter 1.4 x64 6c           3366   20   20   683   53%  3346   57%
   6 Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 6c        3358   15   15  1363   59%  3305   54%
   9 Stockfish 2.2.2 JA x64 6c    3342   20   20   675   51%  3337   56%
  10 Ivanhoe 46hm x64 6c          3337   21   21   610   52%  3328   65%
  12 Fire 2.2 xTreme x64 6c       3311   23   22   530   52%  3297   63%
  14 Vitruvius 1.0C HEM x64 6c    3298   23   23   562   56%  3260   54%
  15 Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 4c        3293   13   14  1602   47%  3314   56%
  16 Critter 1.2 x64 4c           3293   16   16  1162   48%  3305   56%
  17 IvanHoe 47c GH x64 4c        3282   16   16  1109   49%  3289   60%
  18 Fire 2.2 xTreme x64 4c       3275   16   16  1165   41%  3328   59%
  19 IvanHoe 0B.09.18 x64 4c      3271   17   17  1008   46%  3295   57%
  21 IvanHoe B47d x64 4c          3268   16   17  1067   42%  3321   55%
  23 Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 1c      3263   13   13  2088   61%  3186   42%
  24 IvanHoe B47f02 x64 4c        3260   17   17  1004   48%  3275   59%
  26 Houdini 2.0 Pro x64 1c       3254   14   14  1575   54%  3229   48%
  27 H2.0c x64 1c Ponder OFF      3244   17   17  1082   57%  3193   45%
  28 Strelka 5.1 x64 1c           3244   14   14  1462   56%  3209   51%
  29 Komodo 4.0 x64 1c            3203   19   19  1138   65%  3043   30%
  30 Rybka 4.1 x64 1c             3199   13   13  1745   48%  3213   49%
  32 Ivanhoe B46fa x64 1c         3193   14   14  1495   50%  3195   57%
  33 Komodo 3.0 x64 1c            3191   12   12  2526   50%  3168   40%
  36 Ivanhoe B50kBf x64 1c        3186   15   15  1282   46%  3211   56%
  39 Deep Junior 12.5.0.3 x64 6c  3179   23   23   544   51%  3174   50%
  41 Ivanhoe B46a x64 1c          3177   16   16  1034   44%  3214   58% 
Sedat Canbaz
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Antalya/Turkey

Re: SCCT Rating List (25.05.2012)

Post by Sedat Canbaz »

One thing more,

In my Ivanhoe 46h's testings,I was not satisfied by its performance

Not sure 100% what can be the reason,but i noticed indeed strange standings:
http://www.sedatcanbaz.com/chess/scct-sse-no-sse/

But however, I think the 'Multiple Matches' (using several GUIs) is the the main reason of those strange results
Another factor of those strange results can be:Engines are played without books
Note also that Critter has many games forfeits on time too (i never noticed same thing before by Critter)
And i dont believe the current standings will be changed a lot (if there will be more games),due to the engines are played without books

For example,i am quite happy with the current SCCT conditions
And unfortunately there is only one engine:Fruit 090705 (tested under Fritz/ShredderGUIs),which has several games lost no time

Greetings,
Sedat
Izak Pretorius
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 7:44 am

Re: SCCT Rating List (25.05.2012)

Post by Izak Pretorius »

ernest wrote:
Sedat Canbaz wrote:More Ivanhoe B46fE.02 x64 6c games are added
Hi Sedat,

Actually I believe there is "a whole basket" of best Ivanhoes, where you can find
Ivanhoe B46fE.02
Ivanhoe B46fC
and perhaps George's favorite, Ivanhoe B46e
... and others (Ivanhoe 46h)

Since nobody seems to be working in depth with the Ivanhoes sources, progress is very small.
If I am alive and well this should change before the end of 2012.
I am working on a "compile" and planning for 50+ elo not 5.
I will be working in depth this time.

Best Regards
Izak
Sedat Canbaz
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Antalya/Turkey

Re: SCCT Rating List (25.05.2012)

Post by Sedat Canbaz »

Izak Pretorius wrote:
ernest wrote:
Sedat Canbaz wrote:More Ivanhoe B46fE.02 x64 6c games are added
Hi Sedat,

Actually I believe there is "a whole basket" of best Ivanhoes, where you can find
Ivanhoe B46fE.02
Ivanhoe B46fC
and perhaps George's favorite, Ivanhoe B46e
... and others (Ivanhoe 46h)

Since nobody seems to be working in depth with the Ivanhoes sources, progress is very small.
If I am alive and well this should change before the end of 2012.
I am working on a "compile" and planning for 50+ elo not 5.
I will be working in depth this time.

Best Regards
Izak
Dea Izak,

You compiles a truly very strong!Great job and keep up the good work!

And it sounds good....in case of +50 Elo Ivanhoe improvement,that mean we will see a serious opponent against Houdini


Best,
Sedat
ernest
Posts: 2053
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:30 pm

Re: SCCT Rating List (25.05.2012)

Post by ernest »

Izak, I also think you are doing a great job! :!: