DiscoCheck 4.0.0 (release candidate)

[Werner]

Many thanks Jim,

it runs here very well!

[Jim Ablett]

Many thanks Jim,

it runs here very well!

Sorry can you hold off using these. I think I compiled 'DEBUG' versions by mistake and the speed is crippled.

Will update and announce soon.

Jim.

[Jim Ablett]

Ok new proper, faster builds are up.


https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5047625/discocheck-400-ja.zip
Mirror:
http://cl.ly/MScR/discocheck-400-ja.zip

Android direct link:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5047625/discoc ... android-ja

Code: Select all

32 bit bench (32 bit system)

signature = 7217665
time = 27.8594


64 bit bench

signature = 7217665
time = 17.9531

[Jim Ablett]

These are the dll files needed to run Lucas's compile.

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5047625/libstdc%2B%2B-6.dll
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5047625/libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll

I recompiled my binaries again for v 4.0.1. I still wasn't happy with the speed.
These are much faster

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5047625/discocheck-401-ja.zip
Mirror:
http://cl.ly/MSiF/discocheck-401-ja.zip

Android direct link:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5047625/discocheck-android-ja

Code: Select all

32 bit bench (32 bit system)

signature = 7217665
time = 24.5469


64 bit bench

signature = 7217665
time = 14.5355

Jim.

[Graham Banks]

I recompiled my binaries again for v 4.0.1. I still wasn't happy with the speed.
These are much faster

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5047625/discocheck-401-ja.zip
Mirror:
http://cl.ly/MSiF/discocheck-401-ja.zip

Android direct link:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5047625/discocheck-android-ja

Thanks Jim. So this is the bugfixed 4.0.1 release that Lucas was talking about?

[Jim Ablett]

I recompiled my binaries again for v 4.0.1. I still wasn't happy with the speed.
These are much faster

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5047625/discocheck-401-ja.zip
Mirror:
http://cl.ly/MSiF/discocheck-401-ja.zip

Android direct link:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5047625/discocheck-android-ja

Thanks Jim. So this is the bugfixed 4.0.1 release that Lucas was talking about?

These were compiled from the latest src code just pulled from the repo.

Revision: 272
Author: lucas.braesch
Date: 27 January 2013 13:16:20
Message:
new windows compile
redid both linux and windows compile, also accounting for the last functional patch, so increment to 4.0.1

No functional change
signature = 7217665

What was the bug ?

Jim.

[Graham Banks]

I recompiled my binaries again for v 4.0.1. I still wasn't happy with the speed.
These are much faster

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5047625/discocheck-401-ja.zip
Mirror:
http://cl.ly/MSiF/discocheck-401-ja.zip

Android direct link:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5047625/discocheck-android-ja

Thanks Jim. So this is the bugfixed 4.0.1 release that Lucas was talking about?

These were compiled from the latest src code just pulled from the repo.

Revision: 272
Author: lucas.braesch
Date: 27 January 2013 13:16:20
Message:
new windows compile
redid both linux and windows compile, also accounting for the last functional patch, so increment to 4.0.1

No functional change
signature = 7217665

What was the bug ?

Jim.

Just going by what Lucas said in the first post:

This is a release candidate, so I'd like to know about bugs primarly, so I can fix them and make a 4.0.1 release with less bugs and so on.

[lucasart]

Just like to say this is more a discussion to establish and fix bugs, especially related to portability. So testers, please don't spend your CPU time on DiscoCheck yet

Jim's compile is functionally correct: it has the right node count. But I find it a bit slow (although I don't know what computer he's using). He gave me some detailled advice in the programming forum, and I'll try to do some cross compiling, and see if I can get fast executables for Windows.

[Graham Banks]

Just like to say this is more a discussion to establish and fix bugs, especially related to portability. So testers, please don't spend your CPU time on DiscoCheck yet

Jim's compile is functionally correct: it has the right node count. But I find it a bit slow (although I don't know what computer he's using). He gave me some detailled advice in the programming forum, and I'll try to do some cross compiling, and see if I can get fast executables for Windows.

Thanks Lucas.
Please let us know when we can start testing the new version with confidence.

[Lyudmil Tsvetkov]

Hi Lucas.
Thanks for the free service!