Unambitious game:
[Event "Computer Chess Game"]
[Site "ENHORNING"]
[Date "2013.04.04"]
[Round "22"]
[White "Spartacus 1.02"]
[Black "Max-Plus 4.8S"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[TimeControl "40/1200"]
[Variant "capablanca"]
[FEN "rnbackqbnr/pppppppppp/10/10/10/10/PPPPPPPPPP/RNBACKQBNR w KQkq - 0 1"]
[SetUp "1"]
1. h4 {+0.17/14} Nc6 {+0.17/10 14} 2. Nh3 {+0.22/14 21} g6 {+0.12/10 24} 3.
d3 {+0.26/13 16} Nh6 {+0.09/10 43} 4. g3 {+0.26/13 24} d6 {-0.06/9 20} 5.
Qi3 {-0.21/12 20} Ng4 {+0.01/9 17} 6. Qg1 {-0.02/14 32} Nh6 {-0.01/10 13}
7. Qi3 {+0.00/13 21} Ng4 {+0.00/10 20} 8. Qg1 {+0.00/16 22} Nh6
{-0.01/11 18}
{XBoard adjudication: repetition draw} 1/2-1/2
Chess variant tournament: Capablanca and similar
Moderator: Ras
-
enhorning
- Posts: 342
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:05 pm
-
hgm
- Posts: 28404
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: Chess variant tournament: Capablanca and similar
Your proposed list seems quite reasonable.
-
enhorning
- Posts: 342
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:05 pm
Re: Chess variant tournament: Capablanca and similar
The games from the mirrored Embassy chess starting position have finished now.
Standings:
Bayeselo give these ratings and LOS matrix:
Max-Plus has finally passed Pair-o-Max, even though its LOS is only 71%.
Given the results so far, Nebiyu 1.43 seems stronger than 1.44 - Bayeselo gives 90% likelihood of superiority. Given this, and given that I said I had space for one more program, I am tempted to include both versions of Nebiyu for the remainder of the tournament as well - to possibly either get higher certainty that 1.43 is indeed stronger, or to find out that it is due to random fluctuations.
The games so far can be downloaded from: https://www.dropbox.com/s/3fnskpwc5k383zq/Capa30sAB.pgn
Out of 544 games, there have been 256 White wins, 33 Draws, and 255 Black wins.
I will start the next set of games, with the cut down list of participants, tomorrow night.
Standings:
Code: Select all
Cross table, sorted by score percentage, Buchholz, SB
Biha Biha TJch Nebi Nebi Joke Spar Sjaa Smir TSCP Max- Pair Ches Fair BigL ArcB Here
1. Bihasa v3.4.3 #### 0=10 1111 1011 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 95% 60.5 (1934.0, 1737.5)
2. Bihasa v3.2 1=01 #### 1011 1110 1111 111= 1101 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 92% 59.0 (1940.0, 1679.5)
3. TJchess10x8 1.1-x64 0000 0100 #### 1111 1111 111= 1011 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 87% 55.5 (1954.0, 1469.8)
4. NebiyuChess_1.43 0100 0001 0000 #### 1111 0010 1111 11== 1111 1111 0111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 77% 49.0 (1980.0, 1217.5)
5. NebiyuChess_1.44 0000 0000 0000 0000 #### 1110 1110 1111 =111 1111 1101 1111 =111 1111 1111 1111 1111 69% 44.0 (2000.0, 971.3)
6. Joker80.np 0000 000= 000= 1101 0001 #### 0011 1010 1=11 1111 =111 1111 1111 =111 1111 1111 1111 68% 43.5 (2002.0, 1000.0)
7. Spartacus 1.02 0000 0010 0100 0000 0001 1100 #### 1111 1=11 1111 111= 1111 =111 1111 1111 1111 1111 68% 43.5 (2002.0, 967.0)
8. Sjaak 524 0000 0000 0000 00== 0000 0101 0000 #### 0010 1111 1011 0110 =1=1 111= 0111 1=11 1110 45% 29.0 (2060.0, 576.5)
9. Smirf BC-173g-X 0000 0000 0000 0000 =000 0=00 0=00 1101 #### 1101 1111 1101 1100 ==01 0111 1011 1110 43% 27.5 (2066.0, 537.0)
10. TSCPtest 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0010 #### 1011 0=01 111= 1011 1=11 1111 1111 37% 23.5 (2082.0, 356.0)
11. Max-Plus 4.8S 0000 0000 0000 1000 0010 =000 000= 0100 0000 0100 #### 011= 01== 1111 0011 1111 0111 35% 22.5 (2086.0, 428.8)
12. Pair-o-Max 4.8S 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 1001 0010 1=10 100= #### 111= 1==0 0100 1110 1111 32% 20.5 (2094.0, 344.5)
13. ChessV_WinBoard 0000 0000 0000 0000 =000 0000 =000 =0=0 0011 000= 10== 000= #### 001= =111 1111 0111 30% 19.0 (2100.0, 327.3)
14. Fairy-Max 4.8S 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 =000 0000 000= ==10 0100 0000 0==1 110= #### =011 1=01 1101 26% 16.5 (2110.0, 282.8)
15. BigLion80 2.23x WB 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 1000 1000 0=00 1100 1011 =000 =100 #### 0111 1101 24% 15.5 (2114.0, 254.0)
16. ArcBishop80 1.01 WB 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0=00 0100 0000 0000 0001 0000 0=10 1000 #### 1=11 13% 8.5 (2142.0, 125.5)
17. Heretic 0.3 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0001 0001 0000 1000 0000 1000 0010 0010 0=00 #### 10% 6.5 (2150.0, 134.3)Code: Select all
ResultSet-EloRating>ratings
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 Bihasa v3.4.3 608 157 157 64 95% -38 2%
2 Bihasa v3.2 552 146 146 64 92% -35 3%
3 TJchess10x8 1.1-x64 444 129 129 64 87% -28 2%
4 NebiyuChess_1.43 281 115 115 64 77% -18 3%
5 NebiyuChess_1.44 182 107 107 64 69% -11 3%
6 Joker80.np 176 107 107 64 68% -11 8%
7 Spartacus 1.02 162 106 106 64 68% -10 5%
8 Sjaak 524 -72 97 97 64 45% 5 9%
9 Smirf BC-173g-X -83 97 97 64 43% 5 8%
10 TSCPtest -164 96 96 64 37% 10 5%
11 Max-Plus 4.8S -172 97 97 64 35% 11 8%
12 Pair-o-Max 4.8S -211 97 97 64 32% 13 8%
13 ChessV_WinBoard -220 94 94 64 30% 14 16%
14 Fairy-Max 4.8S -264 96 96 64 26% 17 14%
15 BigLion80 2.23x WB -294 102 102 64 24% 18 5%
16 ArcBishop80 1.01 WB -431 115 115 64 13% 27 5%
17 Heretic 0.3 -493 128 128 64 10% 31 2%
ResultSet-EloRating>los
Bi Bi TJ Ne Ne Jo Sp Sj Sm TS Ma Pa Ch Fa Bi Ar He
Bihasa v3.4.3 71 95 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99100100100100
Bihasa v3.2 28 87 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99100100100100
TJchess10x8 1.1-x64 4 12 97 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99100100
NebiyuChess_1.43 0 0 2 90 91 94 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99100
NebiyuChess_1.44 0 0 0 9 52 60 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99
Joker80.np 0 0 0 8 47 57 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99
Spartacus 1.02 0 0 0 5 39 42 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99
Sjaak 524 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 91 93 97 98 99 99 99 99
Smirf BC-173g-X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 88 90 97 97 99 99 99 99
TSCPtest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 11 54 75 80 93 97 99 99
Max-Plus 4.8S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 45 71 76 91 96 99 99
Pair-o-Max 4.8S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 24 28 55 79 88 99 99
ChessV_WinBoard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 19 23 44 75 86 99 99
Fairy-Max 4.8S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8 20 24 67 98 99
BigLion80 2.23x WB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 11 13 32 96 99
ArcBishop80 1.01 WB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 77
Heretic 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22Given the results so far, Nebiyu 1.43 seems stronger than 1.44 - Bayeselo gives 90% likelihood of superiority. Given this, and given that I said I had space for one more program, I am tempted to include both versions of Nebiyu for the remainder of the tournament as well - to possibly either get higher certainty that 1.43 is indeed stronger, or to find out that it is due to random fluctuations.
The games so far can be downloaded from: https://www.dropbox.com/s/3fnskpwc5k383zq/Capa30sAB.pgn
Out of 544 games, there have been 256 White wins, 33 Draws, and 255 Black wins.
I will start the next set of games, with the cut down list of participants, tomorrow night.
-
hgm
- Posts: 28404
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: Chess variant tournament: Capablanca and similar
I am very surprised by the poor performance of Heretic. The initial version I was running in BotG 2012 was severely bugged, but near the end of the qualifier I replaced it by a version 0.2, which then won virtually all remaining games in the qualifier and consolation group. It seems that this v0.3 is again a regression.
-
enhorning
- Posts: 342
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:05 pm
Re: Chess variant tournament: Capablanca and similar
Hmm - what time control were you using?hgm wrote:I am very surprised by the poor performance of Heretic. The initial version I was running in BotG 2012 was severely bugged, but near the end of the qualifier I replaced it by a version 0.2, which then won virtually all remaining games in the qualifier and consolation group. It seems that this v0.3 is again a regression.
Heretic did clearly better than this in my blitz tests before the tournament... it might be that it's good a blitz, but not at longer time controls?
-
hgm
- Posts: 28404
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: Chess variant tournament: Capablanca and similar
I don't recall exactly what time control I was using, but I am sure it was not blitz. Must have been at least 20 min (on a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo, 32-bit).
-
enhorning
- Posts: 342
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:05 pm
Re: Chess variant tournament: Capablanca and similar
No idea then. I have noticed it losing some games on time, but haven't kept track of how many.
-
enhorning
- Posts: 342
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:05 pm
Re: Chess variant tournament: Capablanca and similar
More castling weirdness:
[Event "Computer Chess Game"]
[Site "ENHORNING"]
[Date "2013.04.07"]
[Round "14"]
[White "Max-Plus 4.8S"]
[Black "Spartacus 1.02"]
[Result "1-0"]
[TimeControl "40/1200"]
[Variant "capablanca"]
[FEN "rqnbakbncr/pppppppppp/10/10/10/10/PPPPPPPPPP/RQNBAKBNCR w KQkq - 0 1"]
[SetUp "1"]
{--------------
r q n b a k b n c r
p p p p p p p p p p
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
P P P P P P P P P P
R Q N B A K B N C R
white to play
--------------}
1. c3 {+0.07/10} Af6 {-0.02/15 29} 2. Nd3 {+0.13/10 27} d6 {+0.14/14 27} 3.
Ng3 {+0.04/10 15} e5 {+0.18/14 16} 4. h3 {-0.05/11 13} Ni6 {+0.08/14 20} 5.
Bi3 {-0.04/11 14} Nh4 {-0.07/14 22} 6. f3 {+0.02/10 17} Ae7 {-0.14/14 25}
7. Ne4 {+0.12/10 14} f5 {+0.04/16 29} 8. g3 {+0.03/11 24} fxe4
{-0.07/16 31} 9. fxe4 {-0.33/12 30} i5 {-0.15/15 17} 10. gxh4 {-0.13/12 31}
ixh4 {-0.22/16 49} 11. Bh2 {-0.12/11 15} Ag5 {-0.39/15 30} 12. Nf2
{-0.21/10 14} Be6 {-0.42/14 15} 13. Qd3 {-0.15/10 16} Ne7 {-0.28/13 16} 14.
Bb3 {+0.00/11 23} Bxb3 {-0.42/14 20} 15. axb3 {-0.05/12 45} Ng6
{-0.40/14 34} 16. Af3 {-0.01/11 16} Nf4 {-0.24/15 28} 17. Axg5
{+0.15/13 25} Bxg5 {-0.28/16 44} 18. Qf3 {+0.30/12 18} Ke7 {-0.28/15 36}
19. O-O-O {+0.17/12 36}
{False illegal-move claim} 1-0
[Event "Computer Chess Game"]
[Site "ENHORNING"]
[Date "2013.04.07"]
[Round "14"]
[White "Max-Plus 4.8S"]
[Black "Spartacus 1.02"]
[Result "1-0"]
[TimeControl "40/1200"]
[Variant "capablanca"]
[FEN "rqnbakbncr/pppppppppp/10/10/10/10/PPPPPPPPPP/RQNBAKBNCR w KQkq - 0 1"]
[SetUp "1"]
{--------------
r q n b a k b n c r
p p p p p p p p p p
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
P P P P P P P P P P
R Q N B A K B N C R
white to play
--------------}
1. c3 {+0.07/10} Af6 {-0.02/15 29} 2. Nd3 {+0.13/10 27} d6 {+0.14/14 27} 3.
Ng3 {+0.04/10 15} e5 {+0.18/14 16} 4. h3 {-0.05/11 13} Ni6 {+0.08/14 20} 5.
Bi3 {-0.04/11 14} Nh4 {-0.07/14 22} 6. f3 {+0.02/10 17} Ae7 {-0.14/14 25}
7. Ne4 {+0.12/10 14} f5 {+0.04/16 29} 8. g3 {+0.03/11 24} fxe4
{-0.07/16 31} 9. fxe4 {-0.33/12 30} i5 {-0.15/15 17} 10. gxh4 {-0.13/12 31}
ixh4 {-0.22/16 49} 11. Bh2 {-0.12/11 15} Ag5 {-0.39/15 30} 12. Nf2
{-0.21/10 14} Be6 {-0.42/14 15} 13. Qd3 {-0.15/10 16} Ne7 {-0.28/13 16} 14.
Bb3 {+0.00/11 23} Bxb3 {-0.42/14 20} 15. axb3 {-0.05/12 45} Ng6
{-0.40/14 34} 16. Af3 {-0.01/11 16} Nf4 {-0.24/15 28} 17. Axg5
{+0.15/13 25} Bxg5 {-0.28/16 44} 18. Qf3 {+0.30/12 18} Ke7 {-0.28/15 36}
19. O-O-O {+0.17/12 36}
{False illegal-move claim} 1-0
-
enhorning
- Posts: 342
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:05 pm
Re: Chess variant tournament: Capablanca and similar
Finished the games from the Schoolhouse Chess starting position:
TJChess performed worse than it had previously - could be a fluke, or could be that having two of the power pieces start so far out on the flanks did not suit it.
So, combining that with the first two starting positions gives us these standings:
1. Bihasa 3.4.3 - 78.0
2. TJChess10x8 - 67.5
3. Nebiyu 1.43 - 61.0
4. Nebiyu 1.44 - 55.5
5. Spartacus - 54.5
6. Joker - 50.0
7. Smirf - 34.0
8. Sjaak - 33.5
9. TSCP - 28.5
10. MaxPlus - 26.0
PGN for this latest round of games can be downloaded from: https://www.dropbox.com/s/9hpf0wd4cl6fg1e/Capa30sC.pgn
Next up is the unbalanced starting position, with all three power pieces on one flank.
Code: Select all
Cross table, sorted by score percentage, Buchholz, SB
Bi TJ Ne Ne Sp Sm Jo TS Sj Ma
1. Bihasa v3.4.3 ## 1= 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 97% 17.5 (145.0, 139.0)
2. TJchess10x8 1.1-x64 0= ## 11 10 11 =0 =0 11 11 =1 67% 12.0 (156.0, 97.0)
3. NebiyuChess_1.43 00 00 ## 1= 01 11 11 11 1= 11 67% 12.0 (156.0, 78.0)
4. NebiyuChess_1.44 00 01 0= ## 01 01 11 11 11 11 64% 11.5 (157.0, 74.5)
5. Spartacus 1.02 00 00 10 10 ## 11 11 11 11 10 61% 11.0 (158.0, 72.0)
6. Smirf BC-173g-X 00 =1 00 10 00 ## 01 00 11 10 36% 6.5 (167.0, 48.5)
7. Joker80.np 00 =1 00 00 00 10 ## 11 00 11 36% 6.5 (167.0, 41.5)
8. TSCPtest 00 00 00 00 00 11 00 ## 10 11 28% 5.0 (170.0, 24.5)
9. Sjaak 524 00 00 0= 00 00 00 11 01 ## 10 25% 4.5 (171.0, 27.5)
10. Max-Plus 4.8S 00 =0 00 00 01 01 00 00 01 ## 19% 3.5 (173.0, 28.0)So, combining that with the first two starting positions gives us these standings:
1. Bihasa 3.4.3 - 78.0
2. TJChess10x8 - 67.5
3. Nebiyu 1.43 - 61.0
4. Nebiyu 1.44 - 55.5
5. Spartacus - 54.5
6. Joker - 50.0
7. Smirf - 34.0
8. Sjaak - 33.5
9. TSCP - 28.5
10. MaxPlus - 26.0
PGN for this latest round of games can be downloaded from: https://www.dropbox.com/s/9hpf0wd4cl6fg1e/Capa30sC.pgn
Next up is the unbalanced starting position, with all three power pieces on one flank.
-
enhorning
- Posts: 342
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:05 pm
Re: Chess variant tournament: Capablanca and similar
Hmm, why did Max-Plus not see this checkmate coming, after spending 1 minute on the move before?
[Event "Computer Chess Game"]
[Site "ENHORNING"]
[Date "2013.04.09"]
[Round "13"]
[White "Smirf BC-173g-X"]
[Black "Max-Plus 4.8S"]
[Result "1-0"]
[TimeControl "40/1200"]
[Variant "capablanca"]
[FEN "rbbnnkcaqr/pppppppppp/10/10/10/10/PPPPPPPPPP/RBBNNKCAQR w KQkq - 0 1"]
[SetUp "1"]
{--------------
r b b n n k c a q r
p p p p p p p p p p
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
P P P P P P P P P P
R B B N N K C A Q R
white to play
--------------}
1. Nf3 {+0.31/9} Nf6 {+0.11/10 17} 2. d4 {+0.35/9 27} Ne6 {+0.10/11 25} 3.
c4 {+0.42/9 26} d5 {+0.13/11 40} 4. cxd5 {+0.94/10 23} Nxd5 {-0.11/11 27}
5. e4 {+0.90/9 27} Nf6 {-0.09/11 18} 6. e5 {+1.09/9 20} Nd7 {-0.26/11 19}
7. Ag3 {+1.52/9 27} g6 {+0.06/10 20} 8. h3 {+1.32/9 28} c5 {+0.15/11 14} 9.
d5 {+1.40/9 27} Ng7 {-0.05/11 19} 10. d6 {+1.55/8 21} f6 {-0.01/11 32} 11.
exf6 {+2.13/9 28} Cxf6 {+0.36/11 15} 12. dxe7+ {+2.37/9 28} Ke8
{+0.83/11 21} 13. Bf4 {+2.45/11 45} Nh5 {+1.28/12 14} 14. Bxb8
{+2.58/11 44} Nxg3+ {+0.76/11 19} 15. Bxg3 {+2.73/10 43} b6 {+0.85/11 38}
16. Bd3 {+3.23/10 39} Cd5 {+0.54/11 23} 17. Bc4 {+3.49/10 19} Cb4
{-0.26/11 17} 18. Rc1 {+3.76/11 42} Ba6 {+0.61/11 15} 19. Bxa6
{+3.85/11 38} Cxa2 {+0.44/12 18} 20. Ce2 {+4.73/10 20} Cxa6 {-1.81/12 1:04}
21. Nc3 {+5.51/10 26} Ne5 {-2.36/10 13} 22. Bxe5 {+8.63/9 19} Ai6
{-7.42/12 32} 23. Ce4 {+10.52/9 19} b5 {-9.36/12 36} 24. Bf6 {+12.86/9 35}
Axf3 {-10.71/10 24} 25. gxf3 {+21.15/10 17} Qg8 {-18.20/10 13} 26. Qd6
{+22.04/10 18} Qc4+ {-19.98/12 17} 27. Cxc4 {+25.28/11 20} Cxd6
{-11.73/14 1:00} 28. Cxd6#
{Xboard adjudication: Checkmate} 1-0
[Event "Computer Chess Game"]
[Site "ENHORNING"]
[Date "2013.04.09"]
[Round "13"]
[White "Smirf BC-173g-X"]
[Black "Max-Plus 4.8S"]
[Result "1-0"]
[TimeControl "40/1200"]
[Variant "capablanca"]
[FEN "rbbnnkcaqr/pppppppppp/10/10/10/10/PPPPPPPPPP/RBBNNKCAQR w KQkq - 0 1"]
[SetUp "1"]
{--------------
r b b n n k c a q r
p p p p p p p p p p
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
P P P P P P P P P P
R B B N N K C A Q R
white to play
--------------}
1. Nf3 {+0.31/9} Nf6 {+0.11/10 17} 2. d4 {+0.35/9 27} Ne6 {+0.10/11 25} 3.
c4 {+0.42/9 26} d5 {+0.13/11 40} 4. cxd5 {+0.94/10 23} Nxd5 {-0.11/11 27}
5. e4 {+0.90/9 27} Nf6 {-0.09/11 18} 6. e5 {+1.09/9 20} Nd7 {-0.26/11 19}
7. Ag3 {+1.52/9 27} g6 {+0.06/10 20} 8. h3 {+1.32/9 28} c5 {+0.15/11 14} 9.
d5 {+1.40/9 27} Ng7 {-0.05/11 19} 10. d6 {+1.55/8 21} f6 {-0.01/11 32} 11.
exf6 {+2.13/9 28} Cxf6 {+0.36/11 15} 12. dxe7+ {+2.37/9 28} Ke8
{+0.83/11 21} 13. Bf4 {+2.45/11 45} Nh5 {+1.28/12 14} 14. Bxb8
{+2.58/11 44} Nxg3+ {+0.76/11 19} 15. Bxg3 {+2.73/10 43} b6 {+0.85/11 38}
16. Bd3 {+3.23/10 39} Cd5 {+0.54/11 23} 17. Bc4 {+3.49/10 19} Cb4
{-0.26/11 17} 18. Rc1 {+3.76/11 42} Ba6 {+0.61/11 15} 19. Bxa6
{+3.85/11 38} Cxa2 {+0.44/12 18} 20. Ce2 {+4.73/10 20} Cxa6 {-1.81/12 1:04}
21. Nc3 {+5.51/10 26} Ne5 {-2.36/10 13} 22. Bxe5 {+8.63/9 19} Ai6
{-7.42/12 32} 23. Ce4 {+10.52/9 19} b5 {-9.36/12 36} 24. Bf6 {+12.86/9 35}
Axf3 {-10.71/10 24} 25. gxf3 {+21.15/10 17} Qg8 {-18.20/10 13} 26. Qd6
{+22.04/10 18} Qc4+ {-19.98/12 17} 27. Cxc4 {+25.28/11 20} Cxd6
{-11.73/14 1:00} 28. Cxd6#
{Xboard adjudication: Checkmate} 1-0