seyyedparsakhatami wrote:HI, all of friends say everything and I was quiet but now say you that please dont attacking me! your says is false............
Try the same with stockfish in console mode: type eval or d:
Heron impossible 231113 X64 Normal mode
Heron impossible 231113 X64 Normal mode
by:Seyyed Mostafa Khatami
d
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| r | n | b | q | k | b | n | r |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| p | p | p | p | p | p | p | p |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| | . | | . | | . | | . |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| . | | . | | . | | . | |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| | . | | . | | . | | . |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| . | | . | | . | | . | |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| R | N | B | Q | K | B | N | R |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
Fen: rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
Key: 5F299FE070F04003
Checkers:
Legal moves: a3 b3 c3 d3 e3 f3 g3 h3 a4 b4 c4 d4 e4 f4 g4 h4 Na3 Nc3 Nf3 Nh3
Oh my... This is an exact copy of SF. I knew since from the beginning it was about a cheater, but... This guy just appears out of nowhere bragging about his "new engine" supposedly written in the time span of 6 months, and don't even bother to change more than engine's name and author? Seriously??
bhlangonijr wrote:What does that kind of people have in their mind?
Can you be sure that this Irani compile did not include any additional code?
(Probably it really does not include any additional code, given that this attempt is so very naive, but you never know.)
don't take it word for word what i am saying. I would at least expect from cheaters removing the basic particularities from the copied programs , as the eval command in SF - It is not a UCI standard, as you know. Few programs have this feature, and even less the exact way it is displayed by SF. It just shows the lack of a minimal grasp of the code and basic functionalities. Adding something in the code wouldn't change anything. This was not just naive, but rather dumb.
bhlangonijr wrote:What does that kind of people have in their mind?
Can you be sure that this Irani compile did not include any additional code?
(Probably it really does not include any additional code, given that this attempt is so very naive, but you never know.)
don't take it word for word what i am saying. I would at least expect from cheaters removing the basic particularities from the copied programs , as the eval command in SF - It is not a UCI standard, as you know. Few programs have this feature, and even less the exact way it is displayed by SF. It just shows the lack of a minimal grasp of the code and basic functionalities. Adding something in the code wouldn't change anything. This was not just naive, but rather dumb.
What I tried to hint at was the possibilty of malware being injected into your machine. That kind of people do exist. Hopefully the author is not one of them.
bhlangonijr wrote:What does that kind of people have in their mind?
Can you be sure that this Irani compile did not include any additional code?
(Probably it really does not include any additional code, given that this attempt is so very naive, but you never know.)
don't take it word for word what i am saying. I would at least expect from cheaters removing the basic particularities from the copied programs , as the eval command in SF - It is not a UCI standard, as you know. Few programs have this feature, and even less the exact way it is displayed by SF. It just shows the lack of a minimal grasp of the code and basic functionalities. Adding something in the code wouldn't change anything. This was not just naive, but rather dumb.
What I tried to hint at was the possibilty of malware being injected into your machine. That kind of people do exist. Hopefully the author is not one of them.
You're right about that. Although I believe it's just a random dude trying to get some attention.