Arasan 17.4

[jdart]

Back in their day, Ruffian and Pharaon were tough competition for Arasan. But the current version of Arasan is a much stronger engine.

--Jon

[Charly]

Hi,

No, that was 10 years ago, with olders version. (maybe the 9th, if I remember...)

In my current "Leagues", the last version I tested, the 17.2, reached 2733 Elo after 43 games.

You can also see my "Alphabetical Tournaments" at the letter A. It performed very well.

I can't wait to test the new version !

ACCC
http://aloheac.perso.neuf.fr/

Arnaud Loheac

[Uri Blass]

Hi,

No, that was 10 years ago, with olders version. (maybe the 9th, if I remember...)

In my current "Leagues", the last version I tested, the 17.2, reached 2733 Elo after 43 games.

You can also see my "Alphabetical Tournaments" at the letter A. It performed very well.

I can't wait to test the new version !

ACCC
http://aloheac.perso.neuf.fr/

Arnaud Loheac

Something seems clearly wrong in your rating list
All the top engines get more than 90% and some relatively weak engines have higher rating than houdini4.

1 Stockfish 5 x64 3072 342 210 43 100% 2190 0%
2 Critter 1.6a x64 2969 341 190 40 100% 2229 0%
3 Armageddon 1.0 32 2943 267 174 43 99% 2217 2%
4 Protector 1.6.0 x64 2931 344 195 34 100% 2185 0%
5 Mars 2.1 x64 2928 267 178 39 99% 2215 3%
6 Strelka 6 x64 2916 228 169 43 97% 2194 2%
7 Komodo 6 x64 2907 345 195 34 100% 2198 0%
8 Senpai 1.0 x64 sse 4.2 2889 209 166 43 95% 2195 5%
9 Akkad 0.52b_popcnt_x64 2860 200 151 43 97% 2219 7%
10 Bouquet 1.8 x64 2843 223 160 39 96% 2219 3%
11 BlackMamba 2.0 x64 2833 197 150 39 96% 2219 8%
12 Gull 3 x64 2832 344 194 23 100% 2233 0%
13 MinkoChess 1.3 x64 2822 204 156 39 96% 2217 8%
14 Naum 4.2 x64 2803 179 144 40 95% 2152 10%
15 Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64 2799 227 170 28 96% 2187 7%
16 Vajolet2 1.45 x64 pop 2770 348 203 24 100% 2186 0%
17 Zappa Mexico II x64 2764 345 198 20 100% 2180 0%
18 DeepSaros_eXp_rev6-popcnt-x64 2763 200 158 28 95% 2188 11%
19 Ivanhoe 1945a x64 2758 273 197 20 98% 2172 5%
20 Fire 3.0 x64 2757 195 150 32 95% 2196 9%

21 Movei 00.8.438 2750 183 146 39 91% 2219 3%
22 Nirvanachess 1.7 2747 170 142 40 91% 2154 8%
23 SmarThink 1.70 x64 SSE 3 2745 174 144 43 90% 2198 2%
24 Jonny 400 2744 269 186 20 98% 2192 5%
25 Murka 3 x64 2742 179 142 39 92% 2219 5%
26 Houdini 4 Pro 2737 234 178 26 94% 2191 4%

[Charly]

Hi,

The rating list was calculated only with all the games produced with the "Alphabetical Tournaments".

I already said that it was for the moment a very bad rating list, because too few games were played and because the engines didn't played a lot against each others. So it is provided as is, just as a snapshot after the "Alphabetical tournaments".

For the moment, I didn't updated the rating list with the games of the "Leagues". I will do it when all the current Leagues will be finished. (Maybe in one or two monthes). Don't worry, I keep in mind that it will be, for a very long time, a bad rating list. It's just a trend for me, no more.

My main goal is not to produce a very accurate rating list. CCRL, CEGT, Ippon, and many others, for exemple, are doing it very well. My rating list is just, from my point a view, just a very basic trend, mainly useful for me.

Arnaud Loheac

[Sylwy]

http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 00&t=50060

BRAVO_BRAVO_BRAVO, MAESTRO DART !

Not easy improvements at such level !

S R