The Sorcerer's Apprentice

[Lyudmil Tsvetkov]

Capiche?

Capisci/capisce?

Mi dispiace, non capisco.

Take some care, Lyudmil, even more than pumpkin chapiche has as metaphoric meaning in English.


http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/capiche

At this one link

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Capiche

you have to scroll down a little, to see, what I mean.

And if you then still haven't got the full dangerous meaning of capiche, watch some Francis Ford Coppola- films, then you'll know better.

Please stop posting here, because you are getting on my nerves.

I just leave alone any thread that is not about clones or artificially created with no purpose at all.

You seem to know a lot about colloquial American expressions, and yet your English is far from perfect.
If I were in your place, I simply would not post, I would first learn better English, and then post.

You are annoying, indeed.
My posting probably many threads is not annoying, because they have a sense about them, but your posting one and the same thing without having a point all over again is really annoying.

Instead, you might want to post some analysis, diagrams, etc.

Again, I did not post in any of Mr. Flesher's threads, or comment on his test positions, but he frequently does so with mine.

[peter]

Please stop posting here, because you are getting on my nerves.

If you mean "here" as for "your" thread, that's ok for me, Lyudmil.
It's content as for chess was nil from the very start anyhow.

You seem to know a lot about colloquial American expressions, and yet your English is far from perfect.

I never said it was near to anything you'd call perfect, even if I doubt you the very best instance for judging this as well as for chess btw.

"Colloquial" expressions on the other hand are something very useful to talk to native speakers, Lyudmil, something I obviously have to do some more than you, therefore I just wanted to help you out with such now and then, but I see you can deal with this kind of help as bad as with one in chess.

Again, I did not post in any of Mr. Flesher's threads, or comment on his test positions, but he frequently does so with mine.

This kind of "my thread- your thread"- attidude seems a little childish to me, Lyudmil, but for this I have an easy solution to offer to you too: (cause what otherwise should we do with threads neither you nor I did start )

Don't answer my postings anymore, then I will do the same with yours.
As long as you try to tell me what to do or let, I always think, you want to communicate, even if in a somehow dominant way.

Now, that I know, you don't want to (at least in this your great thread about the Sorcerer's Apprentice), I'd even leave a last word to you, without answering anymore.

The threads you start won't be read by anybody but you and maybe Louis soon anyhow if you go on like this.

[peter]

Sorry, Lyudmil A., I must not answer anymore in this thread, Lyudmil T. has forbidden it.


http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 35&t=55963

Please stop posting here, because you are getting on my nerves.

At least I got him in this way, otherwise he would have said I just shouldn't answer to his postings.

But you could start a new thread, there we could go on talking about chess and Lyudmil T.'s way of "more than human" approach to it.

[Robert Flesher]

Capiche?

Capisci/capisce?

Mi dispiace, non capisco.

Take some care, Lyudmil, even more than pumpkin chapiche has as metaphoric meaning in English.


http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/capiche

At this one link

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Capiche

you have to scroll down a little, to see, what I mean.

And if you then still haven't got the full dangerous meaning of capiche, watch some Francis Ford Coppola- films, then you'll know better.

Please stop posting here, because you are getting on my nerves.

I just leave alone any thread that is not about clones or artificially created with no purpose at all.

You seem to know a lot about colloquial American expressions, and yet your English is far from perfect.
If I were in your place, I simply would not post, I would first learn better English, and then post.

You are annoying, indeed.
My posting probably many threads is not annoying, because they have a sense about them, but your posting one and the same thing without having a point all over again is really annoying.

Instead, you might want to post some analysis, diagrams, etc.

Again, I did not post in any of Mr. Flesher's threads, or comment on his test positions, but he frequently does so with mine.

Once again I will tell you that I enjoy the material you post, it is of great interest to me. However, you make some outlandish conclusions, and when people engage you and ask for proof, they are met with an obstinate reply. If you would prefer to have those of us who enjoy your posts to stop engaging, so be it. So much for discussion.

[zullil]

Ng3

[d]r3nrk1/ppq1b1pb/1n3p1p/2pP1P2/2P1P3/1PQ2NN1/P5PP/R1B1R1K1 b - - 0 9

SF plays Bd6 with evaluation 46 cp for Black.
[d]r3nrk1/ppq3pb/1n1b1p1p/2pP1P2/2P1P3/1PQ2NN1/P5PP/R1B1R1K1 w - - 2 23

[Lyudmil Tsvetkov]

Ng3

[d]r3nrk1/ppq1b1pb/1n3p1p/2pP1P2/2P1P3/1PQ2NN1/P5PP/R1B1R1K1 b - - 0 9

SF plays Bd6 with evaluation 46 cp for Black.
[d]r3nrk1/ppq3pb/1n1b1p1p/2pP1P2/2P1P3/1PQ2NN1/P5PP/R1B1R1K1 w - - 2 23

Nh5

[d]r3nrk1/ppq3pb/1n1b1p1p/2pP1P1N/2P1P3/1PQ2N2/P5PP/R1B1R1K1 b - - 0 10

[zullil]

Nh5

[d]r3nrk1/ppq3pb/1n1b1p1p/2pP1P1N/2P1P3/1PQ2N2/P5PP/R1B1R1K1 b - - 0 10

SF says Nd7 with eval 50 cp for Black.
[d]r3nrk1/ppqn2pb/3b1p1p/2pP1P1N/2P1P3/1PQ2N2/P5PP/R1B1R1K1 w - - 4 24

[Lyudmil Tsvetkov]

Nh5

[d]r3nrk1/ppq3pb/1n1b1p1p/2pP1P1N/2P1P3/1PQ2N2/P5PP/R1B1R1K1 b - - 0 10

SF says Nd7 with eval 50 cp for Black.
[d]r3nrk1/ppqn2pb/3b1p1p/2pP1P1N/2P1P3/1PQ2N2/P5PP/R1B1R1K1 w - - 4 24

Qe3

[d]r3nrk1/ppqn2pb/3b1p1p/2pP1P1N/2P1P3/1P2QN2/P5PP/R1B1R1K1 b - - 0 11

[melajara]

I certainly appreciate those threads aiming at steering SF to higher positional understanding, please continue this and don't be distracted by the petty critics of people not understanding that hubris and genius form many alloys, some brittle, some super strong

Now in that particular instance, I'm curious to see how you will kick back and demonstrate White's advantage now that SF has a firm grasp on the key e5 square, let's see.
Perhaps g3 to prepare Nf4 aiming at e6, with control back over e5 if BxN?

[Lyudmil Tsvetkov]

I certainly appreciate those threads aiming at steering SF to higher positional understanding, please continue this and don't be distracted by the petty critics of people not understanding that hubris and genius form many alloys, some brittle, some super strong

Now in that particular instance, I'm curious to see how you will kick back and demonstrate White's advantage now that SF has a firm grasp on the key e5 square, let's see.
Perhaps g3 to prepare Nf4 aiming at e6, with control back over e5 if BxN?

Thanks for the kind words, Mel.

I like such posts/threads, where the positive and the kind prevail over the the negative and disparaging.

We will see, SF does not have an easy time either.