Laskos wrote:The male game hunters like Cro-Magnons of 20,000-30,000 ago averaged 177 cm or even taller and were more massively built than even today's humans (much taller and more heavily built than Romans or medievals).
Sure they were just because you've read it on Wiki citing some ridiculous book from 100 years ago.
Open any credible source and you'll see that they were not even 170 on average. Hardly taller than today's Chinese male.
Laskos wrote:The male game hunters like Cro-Magnons of 20,000-30,000 ago averaged 177 cm or even taller and were more massively built than even today's humans (much taller and more heavily built than Romans or medievals).
Sure they were just because you've read it on Wiki citing some ridiculous book from 100 years ago.
Open any credible source and you'll see that they were not even 170 on average. Hardly taller than today's Chinese male.
Like the authoritative "Human Bio-archaeology of the Transition to Agriculture", Wiley-Blackwell 2011 ?
If Kasparov is a genius in chess and a naive in science, some on CCC combine scientific ignorance with bad education. Still can advice you to the same Wikipedia.
Laskos wrote:The male game hunters like Cro-Magnons of 20,000-30,000 ago averaged 177 cm or even taller and were more massively built than even today's humans (much taller and more heavily built than Romans or medievals).
Sure they were just because you've read it on Wiki citing some ridiculous book from 100 years ago.
Open any credible source and you'll see that they were not even 170 on average. Hardly taller than today's Chinese male.
Like the authoritative "Human Bio-archaeology of the Transition to Agriculture", Wiley-Blackwell 2011 ?
If Kasparov is a genius in chess and a naive in science, some on CCC combine scientific ignorance with bad education. Still can advice you to the same Wikipedia.
Wikipedia seams the only thing you can actually read. Another quote from it. Could you actually quote the page from that book where the fact is mentioned?
Laskos wrote:The male game hunters like Cro-Magnons of 20,000-30,000 ago averaged 177 cm or even taller and were more massively built than even today's humans (much taller and more heavily built than Romans or medievals).
Sure they were just because you've read it on Wiki citing some ridiculous book from 100 years ago.
Open any credible source and you'll see that they were not even 170 on average. Hardly taller than today's Chinese male.
Like the authoritative "Human Bio-archaeology of the Transition to Agriculture", Wiley-Blackwell 2011 ?
If Kasparov is a genius in chess and a naive in science, some on CCC combine scientific ignorance with bad education. Still can advice you to the same Wikipedia.
Wikipedia seams the only thing you can actually read. Another quote from it. Could you actually quote the page from that book where the fact is mentioned?
No, I don't own that book. Only my memory of "177 cm" was from it. Where from are your memories of "below 170 cm"?
Laskos wrote:The male game hunters like Cro-Magnons of 20,000-30,000 ago averaged 177 cm or even taller and were more massively built than even today's humans (much taller and more heavily built than Romans or medievals).
Sure they were just because you've read it on Wiki citing some ridiculous book from 100 years ago.
Open any credible source and you'll see that they were not even 170 on average. Hardly taller than today's Chinese male.
Like the authoritative "Human Bio-archaeology of the Transition to Agriculture", Wiley-Blackwell 2011 ?
If Kasparov is a genius in chess and a naive in science, some on CCC combine scientific ignorance with bad education. Still can advice you to the same Wikipedia.
Wikipedia seams the only thing you can actually read. Another quote from it. Could you actually quote the page from that book where the fact is mentioned?
No, I don't own that book. Only my memory of "177 cm" was from it. Where from are your memories of "below 170 cm"?
Haha, your memory from the book, that's hilarious. You opened Wiki and read the info, when I challenged you, you quoted same bogus reference from Wiki to the book where there is nothing but different bones measures given in tables, book you actually never seen or read.
For starter you can open Britannica and read reference under Cro-Magnon.
Laskos wrote:The male game hunters like Cro-Magnons of 20,000-30,000 ago averaged 177 cm or even taller and were more massively built than even today's humans (much taller and more heavily built than Romans or medievals).
Sure they were just because you've read it on Wiki citing some ridiculous book from 100 years ago.
Open any credible source and you'll see that they were not even 170 on average. Hardly taller than today's Chinese male.
Like the authoritative "Human Bio-archaeology of the Transition to Agriculture", Wiley-Blackwell 2011 ?
If Kasparov is a genius in chess and a naive in science, some on CCC combine scientific ignorance with bad education. Still can advice you to the same Wikipedia.
Wikipedia seams the only thing you can actually read. Another quote from it. Could you actually quote the page from that book where the fact is mentioned?
No, I don't own that book. Only my memory of "177 cm" was from it. Where from are your memories of "below 170 cm"?
Haha, your memory from the book, that's hilarious. You opened Wiki and read the info, when I challenged you, you quoted same bogus reference from Wiki to the book where there is nothing but different bones measures given in tables, book you actually never seen or read.
For starter you can open Britannica and read reference under Cro-Magnon.
I see you are a sensitive observer of human beings. On CCC there are many weirdos, some are well behaving ignorants, other much worse. And yes, I like Wikipedia.
Laskos wrote:The male game hunters like Cro-Magnons of 20,000-30,000 ago averaged 177 cm or even taller and were more massively built than even today's humans (much taller and more heavily built than Romans or medievals).
Sure they were just because you've read it on Wiki citing some ridiculous book from 100 years ago.
Open any credible source and you'll see that they were not even 170 on average. Hardly taller than today's Chinese male.
Mature a bit. Were male Cro-Magnons "below 170 cm" on average? And if you don't have a clue, why are you posting at all this nonsense together with the admission that Wikipedia is too hard for you? I sincerely recommended Kasparov (and you) to browse Wikipedia regarding his para-scientific theories and your nonsense. In fact, there is no much need for Wiley-Blackwell compendium you hate so much, Wikipedia level knowledge is maybe good enough to begin master level studies in archaeological anthropology, aside the practical part. Calm down, and try at least to be civil and literate, if you hate Wikipedia too.