(as june, 2016)
I don´t own a copy of Komodo, but I think Stockfish plays quite well in closed positions...
Which engine do you think is the best in closed positions?
Moderator: Ras
-
Ponti
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:13 am
- Location: Curitiba - PR - BRAZIL
- Full name: Aloisio Ponti Lopes
Which engine do you think is the best in closed positions?
A. Ponti
AMD Ryzen 1800x, Windows 10.
FIDE current ratings: standard 1913, rapid 1931
AMD Ryzen 1800x, Windows 10.
FIDE current ratings: standard 1913, rapid 1931
-
Lyudmil Tsvetkov
- Posts: 6052
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:41 pm
Re: Which engine do you think is the best in closed position
Man, they can not even play well open positions.
Btw., who played 3 minutes and who 90 minutes in Komodo vs Erenburg?
Btw., who played 3 minutes and who 90 minutes in Komodo vs Erenburg?
-
Henk
- Posts: 7261
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:31 am
Re: Which engine do you think is the best in closed position
Just read the book "Think like an algorithm".Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote:Man, they can not even play well open positions.
Btw., who played 3 minutes and who 90 minutes in Komodo vs Erenburg?
-
Lyudmil Tsvetkov
- Posts: 6052
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:41 pm
Re: Which engine do you think is the best in closed position
For closed position performance, you might want to see this one:
[d]r5kr/1p1bq1b1/1Pp2n2/p1Pp4/P2Pp1p1/B3PpPp/1NN2P1P/R2QK2R w KQ - 0 1
white mates in 64 moves(128 plies).
32 moves (64 plies) until white sends a knigth to b3,bishop to c3,queen to d2 and captures black a5 pawn, and then another 32 moves(64 plies) until mate.
So, unless you have a very reliable search spanning full 128 plies, or, a very accurate eval at ply 1, above position will be unresolvable.
And indeed, engines tend to give here substantial black advantage.
[d]r5kr/1p1bq1b1/1Pp2n2/p1Pp4/P2Pp1p1/B3PpPp/1NN2P1P/R2QK2R w KQ - 0 1
white mates in 64 moves(128 plies).
32 moves (64 plies) until white sends a knigth to b3,bishop to c3,queen to d2 and captures black a5 pawn, and then another 32 moves(64 plies) until mate.
So, unless you have a very reliable search spanning full 128 plies, or, a very accurate eval at ply 1, above position will be unresolvable.
And indeed, engines tend to give here substantial black advantage.
-
royb
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:53 am
Re: Which engine do you think is the best in closed position
Erenberg had 90 minutes + 30 secs per move increment.Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote:Man, they can not even play well open positions.
Btw., who played 3 minutes and who 90 minutes in Komodo vs Erenburg?
Komodo had 3 minutes + 1 sec per move increment.
Komodo ran on one core with no pondering.
Komodo used an opening book of only 3 moves.
Komodo was not allowed to use TBs.
Komodo won 2 (previous games) and drew the game yesterday.
If I got any of that wrong, someone will correct me, but it's what Simon (the GM commentator) said at the beginning of the game.
-
Lyudmil Tsvetkov
- Posts: 6052
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:41 pm
Re: Which engine do you think is the best in closed position
Gee, and I thought Erenburg was handicapped...royb wrote:Erenberg had 90 minutes + 30 secs per move increment.Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote:Man, they can not even play well open positions.
Btw., who played 3 minutes and who 90 minutes in Komodo vs Erenburg?
Komodo had 3 minutes + 1 sec per move increment.
Komodo ran on one core with no pondering.
Komodo used an opening book of only 3 moves.
Komodo was not allowed to use TBs.
Komodo won 2 (previous games) and drew the game yesterday.
If I got any of that wrong, someone will correct me, but it's what Simon (the GM commentator) said at the beginning of the game.