Chess Game Analyzer

[corres]

[quote="Ferdy"][quote="corres"]After the method supposed by you your program not stopped, BUT a lot of game disappeared from the Output.pgn.
I think you out to copy the header of input.pgn to the output.pgn "in raw",
without any code checking.[/quote]
Can't clearly understand that. What did you do? What options did you use? does the input pgn still problematic?[/quote]

I exactly did what you supposed to do with Notepad++.

[Vinvin]

Strange thing with this game finished as draw : Score was >5 for 2 moves

What do you mean by that? Which moves?

Moves #59 black and #61 black the score are above +5.
From moves #49 to #63, eval is 16 times >+2.
From this, is it possible to reach 0.00 at move #66 with only "1 Dubious" move ?
I think not. There's a problem with Blunder/Mistake/Dubious detection.

[Ferdy]

Strange thing with this game finished as draw : Score was >5 for 2 moves

What do you mean by that? Which moves?

Moves #59 black and #61 black the score are above +5.
From moves #49 to #63, eval is 16 times >+2.
From this, is it possible to reach 0.00 at move #66 with only "1 Dubious" move ?
I think not. There's a problem with Blunder/Mistake/Dubious detection.

Move 59 of black:
1. Engine move: Qxg3 +3.14 better for white
2. Game move: Qd2 +5.54 better for white.
Since the score is already losing for black (score >= +3) engine is +3.14, there is no need to add move annotation symbol. This is by design.

Move 61 of black:
Same situation in move 59 of black.

Move 49 of black:
The engine score is +1.41 and game move is +2.07. Note that the score in this analysis is white POV. So this is is better for white. and the game move is sub optimal. It gets ? because the score +2.07 belongs to moderate advantage for white. If the game move is worth +3.0, that move could have received ?? because the score +3.0 is decisive advantage for white already.

Table:
decisive: score >= 3.0
moderate: score >= 1 and score < 3.0
slight: score >= 0.25 and score < 1.0

It is not the difference that matters but the score of your move, if the score of the move gives the opponent a decisive advantage, that move will get ?? (if the position is already losing this symbol is not appended to the move). If the score of the move gives the opponent a moderate advatage, that move will get ?. If the score of the move gives the opponent a slight advantage that move will get ?!. There is one exception to this rule. If the engine score is decisive (score >= 3.0) already and the game move would result to drawish score (score > -0.25 and score < 0.25), I add ? to the game move.

[Kirk]

Sorry, are there a windows version?

In the next release I will include a windows exe file.

I'm waiting eagerly for it

Hi Ferdy,

Any ideas when the first Windows beta might be released?

Thanks!

[Ferdy]

Sorry, are there a windows version?

In the next release I will include a windows exe file.

I'm waiting eagerly for it

Hi Ferdy,

Any ideas when the first Windows beta might be released?

Thanks!

Perhaps November!

[Kirk]

Sorry, are there a windows version?

In the next release I will include a windows exe file.

I'm waiting eagerly for it

Hi Ferdy,

Any ideas when the first Windows beta might be released?

Thanks!

Perhaps November!

Thanks for the update!

[Elorejano]

Hi!
How can i set the bat file for to fix the time used by the engine to 3 minutes (180 seconds) for each move?
Sorry for my bad english
Thanks in advance

[Ferdy]

Hi!
How can i set the bat file for to fix the time used by the engine to 3 minutes (180 seconds) for each move?
Sorry for my bad english
Thanks in advance

Code: Select all

--movetime 180000

[Elorejano]

Thanks, Fer!

[retep1]

is there a new release date for the Windows-Beta?