FGRL 60 sec + 0.6 sec Rating list - Komodo 10.3

[fastgm]

Rating list - 60 seconds + 0.6 seconds

Komodo 10.3 (+2 to Komodo 10.2)

http://www.fastgm.de

[pohl4711]

Ouch! Disappointing result for Komodo 10.3...

[cdani]

Ouch! Disappointing result for Komodo 10.3...

Maybe the changes favor long time control...

[majortom]

With default contempt K10.3 has terrible statistics against top engines:

Code: Select all

Komodo 10.3 64-bit 

     vs.                             :  games (     +,    =,   -),   (%) 

     asmFish 161212 x64              :    250 (    27,  127,  96),  36.2 
     Stockfish 8 64                  :    250 (    26,  140,  84),  38.4
     Houdini 5 x64                   :    250 (    31,  141,  78),  40.6

[beram]

Ouch! Disappointing result for Komodo 10.3...

Maybe the changes favor long time control...

Don't think so Daniel: see results sofar by Chilantiev http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=62607
as you can see it is Stockfish doing even better at LTC

TC 120"+2", 1 core per engine, hash - 2048 MB

1 Stockfish 221216 64 POPCNT : 64 280 (+ 70,=191,- 19), 59.1 %
2 Komodo 10.3 64-bit : 0 280 (+ 19,=191,- 70), 40.9 %

TC 1800"+10", 2 cores per engine, hash - 512 MB

1 Stockfish 221216 64 : 114 60 (+ 22,= 35,- 3), 65.8 %
2 Komodo 10.3 64-bit : 0 60 (+ 3,= 35,- 22), 34.2 %

[majortom]

In these matches K10.3 plays with different contempt.

C0

TC 120"+2", 1 core per engine, hash - 2048 MB

1 Stockfish 221216 64 POPCNT : 64 280 (+ 70,=191,- 19), 59.1 %
2 Komodo 10.3 64-bit : 0 280 (+ 19,=191,- 70), 40.9 %

C10

TC 1800"+10", 2 cores per engine, hash - 512 MB

1 Stockfish 221216 64 : 114 60 (+ 22,= 35,- 3), 65.8 %
2 Komodo 10.3 64-bit : 0 60 (+ 3,= 35,- 22), 34.2 %