Well, if you go to the core of it, analyzing chess positions with whatever you have available is a pointless excercise, because any state of the art analysis you make will be obsolete down the road.shrapnel wrote:Again the pointless exercise of analyzing with the losing Engine, Stockfish.
This didn't stop people from analyzing their games 9 years ago with Rybka 3, back then it was the strongest thing available, and it was crushing the second strongest thing 3 times harder than A0 defeated Stockfish.
Nowadays you can take a look at Rybka 3's analysis and say it's garbage compared to Stockfish. However, if you had access to A0's analysis it wouldn't change a thing, unless the position was easy, you'd be just as far away from perfection as you're now.
A0 is just a new paradigm, it's like the Rybka 1.0 Beta of our time, that back then kicked something up that everyone did, and skyrocketted chess engine strength by 600 ELO. Can it happen again?
Can you imagine a chess entity that can defeat Stockfish by 600 ELO instead of 100? We could have it in 10 years, and then any analysis you could have made with A0 would look like garbage, making analyzing with it a pointless exercise.
Stockfish drew 73 of its games on the match against it, after all, so in those games 1 minute pointless moves sufficed to stop the beast.