Read alarm bells would ring if we did include it. As Gabor alludes to, it would compromise the integrity of the rating list because the learning engine is not constant. It is against our rules, simple as that.Ovyron wrote:Red alarms should ring when potentially, your rating list would not include the strongest chess entity on the planet due to a technicality.SzG wrote:I guess we would not include it in our lists.
Again, learning entities make sense as long as the testers merge their learn files and the users are allowed to download the learn file that produced the elo shown.
If the learning could somehow be turned off and frozen at a point in time then yes it could be included, and then included as a new engine version some months later with the learning again frozen at that later date.
SSDF do allow learning. I think they are the only ratings list that does.