Aleksei wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 8:18 pmLOL, I never heard something like that. Weren't you taught by your guardians in childhood to say Thank you? Do you even know what gratitude is?
Are you now accusing me of never thanking?
What was I doing in this post, then?
Aleksei wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 8:18 pmListening you, looks like you are contradicting to yourself, from the beginning you say why they delete "thank you" posts, on the other hand, you don’t like the thank you button.. Decide finally!
Have a good evening/night!
Where's the contradiction? I'm arguing about what is sharing, that you shouldn't demand stuff from people when you share, because then it becomes "begware" (you do it because you want something in return), and for the rights of people to thank in a post instead of having to use an imposed artificial "thanking" system (don't confuse a Thank button with gratitude, anyone can press the thank button even if they're not grateful), and for people to stop labeling people with stuff like "sharers and grabbers" and then making others feel bad if they don't share even if they don't know their situation.
The point where you become a sharer at MZ Chess was arbitrary anyway, you need to share 10 things to be able to see attachments, so apparently even people that shared 9 things are still "grabbers"
Hurnavich wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 8:38 pmLets see if the critics have anything to say when the fountain runs dry just saying
It would be a first, if MZ Chess dies and isn't replaced by something better. People don't like to leave their comfort zone, they only do it if they have to, like people wanting to share and others wanting what is shared. If there's supply and demand people will find a way.
The fountain will never run dry because the people that want to share will continue to do so and MZ Chess wasn't the only place where it could be done, and new ones can be created.
(or maybe MZ Chess is back tomorrow and all these discussions become moot

)