Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.
Moderator: Ras
MMarco
Posts: 213 Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2020 1:09 am
Full name: Marc-O Moisan-Plante
Post
by MMarco » Wed Sep 02, 2020 6:47 pm
mwyoung wrote: ↑ Tue Sep 01, 2020 11:44 pm
MMarco wrote: ↑ Tue Sep 01, 2020 11:34 pm
mwyoung wrote: ↑ Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:54 pm
mwyoung wrote: ↑ Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:07 pm
Alayan wrote: ↑ Tue Sep 01, 2020 1:21 pm
Looks like with this drawish opening book, even Ethereal is really hard to beat.
And less than 100 elo performance gap from top to bottom in this run so far. Small sample size, but it still tells us something.
What did this same drawish book tell you at 3m+2s?
I will show you, same "drawish opening book", same settings, only the time control has changed. 3m+2s vs here 15m+15s.
Code: Select all
Result:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# name games wins draws losses score los% elo+/-
1. SF+NNUE PO 290720 x64 avx2 60 18 42 0 39.0 100.0 107.5
2. Stockfish 260820 60 10 50 0 35.0 99.9 58.5
3. Stockfish 240820 60 8 42 10 29.0 31.9 -11.6
4. Lc0 v0.26.1 60 6 51 3 31.5 84.1 17.4
5. Komodo 14 64-bit 60 4 42 14 25.0 0.9 -58.5
6. Ethereal 12.25 (POPCNT) 60 0 41 19 20.5 0.0 -113.9
Does SF NNUE "PO" stand for Ponder On? On 32 threads?
No.
sf-nnue po 290720
@FireFather FireFather released this on Jul 28
stockfish+nnue po (play only)
The download includes fast optimized PGO bmi2, avx2, & popc (sse42) binaries
https://github.com/FireFather/sf-nnue/releases
OK! That makes more sense!
Interesting because this is a Pure NNue compile, created before the hybridisation.
mwyoung
Posts: 2727 Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm
Post
by mwyoung » Wed Sep 02, 2020 8:06 pm
MMarco wrote: ↑ Wed Sep 02, 2020 6:47 pm
mwyoung wrote: ↑ Tue Sep 01, 2020 11:44 pm
MMarco wrote: ↑ Tue Sep 01, 2020 11:34 pm
mwyoung wrote: ↑ Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:54 pm
mwyoung wrote: ↑ Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:07 pm
Alayan wrote: ↑ Tue Sep 01, 2020 1:21 pm
Looks like with this drawish opening book, even Ethereal is really hard to beat.
And less than 100 elo performance gap from top to bottom in this run so far. Small sample size, but it still tells us something.
What did this same drawish book tell you at 3m+2s?
I will show you, same "drawish opening book", same settings, only the time control has changed. 3m+2s vs here 15m+15s.
Code: Select all
Result:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# name games wins draws losses score los% elo+/-
1. SF+NNUE PO 290720 x64 avx2 60 18 42 0 39.0 100.0 107.5
2. Stockfish 260820 60 10 50 0 35.0 99.9 58.5
3. Stockfish 240820 60 8 42 10 29.0 31.9 -11.6
4. Lc0 v0.26.1 60 6 51 3 31.5 84.1 17.4
5. Komodo 14 64-bit 60 4 42 14 25.0 0.9 -58.5
6. Ethereal 12.25 (POPCNT) 60 0 41 19 20.5 0.0 -113.9
Does SF NNUE "PO" stand for Ponder On? On 32 threads?
No.
sf-nnue po 290720
@FireFather FireFather released this on Jul 28
stockfish+nnue po (play only)
The download includes fast optimized PGO bmi2, avx2, & popc (sse42) binaries
https://github.com/FireFather/sf-nnue/releases
OK! That makes more sense!
Interesting because this is a Pure NNue compile, created before the hybridisation.
Yes, that is why it was being tested and hybrid Stockfish NNUE.
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
mwyoung
Posts: 2727 Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm
Post
by mwyoung » Wed Sep 02, 2020 8:07 pm
End of tournament.
Code: Select all
Result:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# name games wins draws losses score los% elo+/-
1. Stockfish 260820 40 5 35 0 22.5 98.7 43.7
2. SF+NNUE PO 290720 x64 avx2 40 4 36 0 22.0 97.7 34.9
3. Lc0 v0.26.1 40 2 38 0 21.0 92.1 17.4
4. Stockfish 240820 40 1 36 3 19.0 15.9 -17.4
5. Komodo 14 64-bit 40 1 35 4 18.5 9.0 -26.1
6. Ethereal 12.25 (POPCNT) 40 0 34 6 17.0 0.7 -52.5
Cross table:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# name score games 1 2 3 4 5 6
1. Stockfish 260820 22.5 40 x ======== ======== =======1 1======= 1=1===1=
2. SF+NNUE PO 290720 x64 avx2 22.0 40 ======== x ======== ======1= ===11=== =1======
3. Lc0 v0.26.1 21.0 40 ======== ======== x ==1===== =====1== ========
4. Stockfish 240820 19.0 40 =======0 ======0= ==0===== x ======== ======1=
5. Komodo 14 64-bit 18.5 40 0======= ===00=== =====0== ======== x =====1==
6. Ethereal 12.25 (POPCNT) 17.0 40 0=0===0= =0====== ======== ======0= =====0== x
Tech:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tech (average nodes, depths, time/m per move, others per game), counted for computing moves only, ignored moves with zero nodes:
# name nodes/m NPS depth/m time/m moves time
1. Stockfish 260820 636654K 22885705 48.4 27.8 61.1 1699.0
2. SF+NNUE PO 290720 x64 avx2 611621K 22756666 51.8 26.9 64.1 1722.8
3. Lc0 v0.26.1 820K 29309 12.5 28.0 63.1 1766.4
4. Stockfish 240820 1084516K 40535112 54.3 26.8 67.8 1815.3
5. Komodo 14 64-bit 1062519K 38130495 45.0 27.9 62.1 1730.4
6. Ethereal 12.25 (POPCNT) 1132625K 40887572 36.9 27.7 62.5 1730.6
all --- 739922K 27565962 41.6 27.5 63.5 1744.1
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.