Asking to people who believe Leela NN is a book, what they think about SF NN now?
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:36 am
Re: Asking to people who believe Leela NN is a book, what they think about SF NN now?
What hypothesis? I eagerly await your strawman.
-
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
- Full name: Dietrich Kappe
Re: Asking to people who believe Leela NN is a book, what they think about SF NN now?
That leela networks are a book. Is that not the topic of this thread and of your oh so well reasoned broadsides?
Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".
-
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:36 am
Re: Asking to people who believe Leela NN is a book, what they think about SF NN now?
Oh, and btw... I actually did outline a way to test if opening knowledge was in the NNs in the google groups post I made many moons ago. A pity nobody seems to have read it.
On the other hand, one could just take away any features which the NN might use in this regard (*cough* history *cough*), and I would call that good. Hell, even just previous to root history would be good enough, but I am quite sure I have also mentioned that many, many times before....
On the other hand, one could just take away any features which the NN might use in this regard (*cough* history *cough*), and I would call that good. Hell, even just previous to root history would be good enough, but I am quite sure I have also mentioned that many, many times before....
-
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
- Full name: Dietrich Kappe
Re: Asking to people who believe Leela NN is a book, what they think about SF NN now?
You *are* the Hopfield Networks guy.jhellis3 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:20 am Oh, and btw... I actually did outline a way to test if opening knowledge was in the NNs in the google groups post I made many moons ago. A pity nobody seems to have read it.
On the other hand, one could just take away any features which the NN might use in this regard (*cough* history *cough*), and I would call that good. Hell, even just previous to root history would be good enough, but I am quite sure I have also mentioned that many, many times before....
Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".
-
- Posts: 4556
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am
Re: Asking to people who believe Leela NN is a book, what they think about SF NN now?
It's pointless to argue with people who don't care about other people's gross logical mistakes in their reasoning, if they make them, to explain their flaws, to educate them.
We're not here to convince others, but to learn. If you think teaching other people how to reason is a waste of time, you're misusing the fora.
-
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:36 am
Re: Asking to people who believe Leela NN is a book, what they think about SF NN now?
And there you have it. I never made this claim. Strawman complete. I have said it is possible Lc0 has book like features for the first several ply, though I do not claim to know to what degree this is true (if at all). In fact, as per my previous post, I outlined a test to measure this effect previously.... not that anybody ever did it mind you.That leela networks are a book.
-
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:36 am
Re: Asking to people who believe Leela NN is a book, what they think about SF NN now?
Another ad hominem. This is strange behavior for someone embarrassing themselves, but whatever.... I think we are done here.You *are* the Hopfield Networks guy.
-
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
- Full name: Dietrich Kappe
Re: Asking to people who believe Leela NN is a book, what they think about SF NN now?
You feel that associating someone with Hopfield Networks is an ad hominem attack? I wonder what other mathematical, statistical and algorithmic concepts fall into this category. Also, pointing out that someone has a demonstrably poor understanding of the subject matter under discussion is scarcely an ad hominem attack. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Last edited by dkappe on Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".
-
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:36 am
Re: Asking to people who believe Leela NN is a book, what they think about SF NN now?
I never said that either. What strawman number is this, I have lost count....You feel that associating someone with Hopfield Networks is an ad hominem attack?
EDIT FOR CLARITY: You post clearly referred to the Hopfield Networks "guy" a person who you have previously identified as having some false beliefs, not Hopfield Networks in general. I have no knowledge of this "guy" but to be labeled as a person under a delusion qualifies an ad hominem in my book.
Last edited by jhellis3 on Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
- Full name: Dietrich Kappe
Re: Asking to people who believe Leela NN is a book, what they think about SF NN now?
Go back and read your own posts. We are done here.
Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".