Jouni wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 12:22 pm
Now SF classic with 232 cores has much lower nps than Komodo 128 cores. Something is wrong now .
maybe Komodo scales better
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
Jouni wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 12:22 pm
Now SF classic with 232 cores has much lower nps than Komodo 128 cores. Something is wrong now .
maybe Komodo scales better
Again you can only split the search so many times effectively. And you CAN NOT measure speed by NPS. To know the real speed difference when using different amounts of threads and cores . YOU MUST USE TIME TO DEPTH.
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
Jouni wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 12:22 pm
Now SF classic with 232 cores has much lower nps than Komodo 128 cores. Something is wrong now .
It looks like you dont understand actual physical cores vs hyperthreads.( 2x Threads=1 core). 232÷2= 116 cores
Stockfish is not running on 232 cores, they dont have 232 cores. Komodo is running on 128 physical cores.
Correct. But the splitting of the search to 232 threads is real. It acts just like a real core but only running at 1/2 speed.
Most likely Stockfish is being hurt by splitting the search 232 times. But to know by how much you would need to measure the performance with time to depth.
Last edited by mwyoung on Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.