I'm using HCE and the net "Niggling Nymph" for this test at short TC (10s+0.1). The hardware used is AVX2 but the "core2" executable is SSE3 but not popcnt, the "nehalem" one is popcnt+SSE4.2 while the "skylake" executable is popcnt+AVX2+BMI2...
Code: Select all
Rank Name                          Elo     +/-   Games   Score    Draw 
   1 minic_3.03_linux_x64_skylake_niny    56      11    2454   58.0%   39.2% 
   2 minic_3.03_linux_x64_nehalem_niny    13      11    2454   51.9%   40.9% 
   3 minic_3.03_linux_x64_nehalem         10      11    2455   51.5%   39.7% 
   4 minic_3.03_linux_x64_skylake          4      11    2455   50.6%   41.4% 
   5 minic_3.03_linux_x64_core2          -36      11    2456   44.9%   39.7% 
   6 minic_3.03_linux_x64_core2_niny     -48      11    2456   43.1%   37.3% 
For HCE first, this looks simple, performance is the same as soon as popcnt is here. Not having popcnt leads to something like -40Elo. Thre is not much dependency to vectorisation but popcnt looks quite important.
For NNUE, AVX2 is +40 versus SSE4.2 and there is again a gap of nearly 60Elo for SSE3.
So that on (very) old hardware, current Minic HCE is better than "Niggling Nymph" !
This can explain some strange results during some testing process and in rating list where I sometimes see my net underperform a lot.
In this table
Code: Select all
Rank Name                                Elo     +/-   Games   Score    Draw 
   1 minic_2.53_napping_nexus            270      12    3080   82.6%   25.7% 
   2 minic_2.53_nascent_nutrient         165      11    3080   72.1%   29.9% 
   3 minic_3.02_nettling_nemesis          79      10    3079   61.2%   29.3% 
   4 minic_3.04_noisy_notch                4      10    3079   50.6%   35.6% 
   5 minic_3.03_niggling_nymph           -33      10    3079   45.3%   35.1% 
   6 minic_3.02_narcotized_nightshift    -47      10    3080   43.2%   34.4% 
   7 minic_2.53                          -52      10    3079   42.6%   34.2% 
   8 minic_2.46                          -64      10    3080   40.9%   32.7% 
   9 minic_3.03                          -70      10    3079   40.1%   34.0% 
  10 minic_3.04                          -78      10    3079   38.9%   32.5% 
  11 minic_3.01_nefarious_nucleus       -127      11    3080   32.4%   26.4% 
There is a more 100Elo gap between "Nefarious Nucleus" and "Niggling Nymph" on AVX2 hardware, this means that on old hardware, "Nefarious Nucleus" or even "Narcotized Nightshift" can be way weaker than HCE.



 Don't get me wrong here, I am totally thankful and respectful of rating list work. It's probably can be a better process like any other thing, but people investing their time, organizing test, maintaining web site, ... about engine rating are really important to me. Thanks again guys !
 Don't get me wrong here, I am totally thankful and respectful of rating list work. It's probably can be a better process like any other thing, but people investing their time, organizing test, maintaining web site, ... about engine rating are really important to me. Thanks again guys ! 