Actually I have played Bikjump (on my super-fast i-9 10 core 20 thread laptop), and while I may have scored in Rapid, I have very little chance in blitz or near-blitz (10' + 5") against it. Yet I will score much better than Bikjump taking knight odds from Dragon. This is what I'm talking about. I know to "keep it simple" when up a knight, Bikjump doesn't know that.
Based on that information, what are the chances that Dragon which is 2 versions more advanced than Komodo 13.3 can defeat GM Nakamura with a Knight Odds at Bullet chess ? Would you say 65% Here are 9 games Vs Magnus Carlsen at Bullet Fischer random, but of course Fischer Random is another story altogether and I believe Carlsen is better than Nakamura at standard Bullet chess. .
It is almost unbelievable how these GMs make great moves at a lightning speed
Actually I have played Bikjump (on my super-fast i-9 10 core 20 thread laptop), and while I may have scored in Rapid, I have very little chance in blitz or near-blitz (10' + 5") against it. Yet I will score much better than Bikjump taking knight odds from Dragon. This is what I'm talking about. I know to "keep it simple" when up a knight, Bikjump doesn't know that.
Based on that information, what are the chances that Dragon which is 2 versions more advanced than Komodo 13.3 can defeat GM Nakamura with a Knight Odds at Bullet chess ? Would you say 65% Here are 9 games Vs Magnus Carlsen at Bullet Fischer random, but of course Fischer Random is another story altogether and I believe Carlsen is better than Nakamura at standard Bullet chess. .
It is almost unbelievable how these GMs make great moves at a lightning speed
When you say Bullet chess, you need to specify 1-0, 1-1, or 2-1, that is critical for engine vs human handicap play. Since the above mentioned Naka vs Carlsen games were apparently 1' + 1", I suppose that's what you mean. It's pretty easy to make draws up a knight even at 1' + 1" (for a top player), since Dragon will normally repeat if still down at least two pawns, so I think that any knight odds match should be Armageddon knight odds, where the player with the extra knight loses in case of a draw. With that rule, I would rate Dragon as the favorite at 1' + 1", while I would rate Nakamura as the favorite at 2' + 1". But I don't have much to go on. I may be underestimating Naka, he might well come out ahead at 1' + 1".
Actually I have played Bikjump (on my super-fast i-9 10 core 20 thread laptop), and while I may have scored in Rapid, I have very little chance in blitz or near-blitz (10' + 5") against it. Yet I will score much better than Bikjump taking knight odds from Dragon. This is what I'm talking about. I know to "keep it simple" when up a knight, Bikjump doesn't know that.
Based on that information, what are the chances that Dragon which is 2 versions more advanced than Komodo 13.3 can defeat GM Nakamura with a Knight Odds at Bullet chess ? Would you say 65% Here are 9 games Vs Magnus Carlsen at Bullet Fischer random, but of course Fischer Random is another story altogether and I believe Carlsen is better than Nakamura at standard Bullet chess. .
It is almost unbelievable how these GMs make great moves at a lightning speed
When you say Bullet chess, you need to specify 1-0, 1-1, or 2-1, that is critical for engine vs human handicap play. Since the above mentioned Naka vs Carlsen games were apparently 1' + 1", I suppose that's what you mean. It's pretty easy to make draws up a knight even at 1' + 1" (for a top player), since Dragon will normally repeat if still down at least two pawns, so I think that any knight odds match should be Armageddon knight odds, where the player with the extra knight loses in case of a draw. With that rule, I would rate Dragon as the favorite at 1' + 1", while I would rate Nakamura as the favorite at 2' + 1". But I don't have much to go on. I may be underestimating Naka, he might well come out ahead at 1' + 1".
Bullet chess 1-0 no Inc with Knight Odds, I favour Dragon, at 1-1 still Dragon, but at 2-0 or over GM Nakamura with a Knight could give Dragon a great challenge
Actually I have played Bikjump (on my super-fast i-9 10 core 20 thread laptop), and while I may have scored in Rapid, I have very little chance in blitz or near-blitz (10' + 5") against it. Yet I will score much better than Bikjump taking knight odds from Dragon. This is what I'm talking about. I know to "keep it simple" when up a knight, Bikjump doesn't know that.
Based on that information, what are the chances that Dragon which is 2 versions more advanced than Komodo 13.3 can defeat GM Nakamura with a Knight Odds at Bullet chess ? Would you say 65% Here are 9 games Vs Magnus Carlsen at Bullet Fischer random, but of course Fischer Random is another story altogether and I believe Carlsen is better than Nakamura at standard Bullet chess. .
It is almost unbelievable how these GMs make great moves at a lightning speed
When you say Bullet chess, you need to specify 1-0, 1-1, or 2-1, that is critical for engine vs human handicap play. Since the above mentioned Naka vs Carlsen games were apparently 1' + 1", I suppose that's what you mean. It's pretty easy to make draws up a knight even at 1' + 1" (for a top player), since Dragon will normally repeat if still down at least two pawns, so I think that any knight odds match should be Armageddon knight odds, where the player with the extra knight loses in case of a draw. With that rule, I would rate Dragon as the favorite at 1' + 1", while I would rate Nakamura as the favorite at 2' + 1". But I don't have much to go on. I may be underestimating Naka, he might well come out ahead at 1' + 1".
At Bullet chess 1-0 with no Inc I favour Dragon and still at 1-1, but at 2-0 or over GM Nakamura with a Knight Odds could give Dragon a great challenge, Sorry for NOT explaining myself better. This is what I believe, but we can only find out next time you arrange GM Nakamura to play Vs Dragon