Chess324

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

dkappe
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
Full name: Dietrich Kappe

Re: Chess324

Post by dkappe »

Chessqueen wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 1:15 am Ethereal is showing a great performance in Chess324, it is holding 3rd place after Dragon 3.1
If you check the version in the GUI, you’ll see 2964.00. Thats not Dragon 3.1.
Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".
Chessqueen
Posts: 5685
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Re: Chess324

Post by Chessqueen »

dkappe wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:17 am
Chessqueen wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 1:15 am Ethereal is showing a great performance in Chess324, it is holding 3rd place after Dragon 3.1
If you check the version in the GUI, you’ll see 2964.00. Thats not Dragon 3.1.
I believe that Mr. Kaufman mentioned that he has a special version that play better at Chess324, so that could be version 2964.00
lkaufman
Posts: 6225
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
Location: Maryland USA
Full name: Larry Kaufman

Re: Chess324

Post by lkaufman »

Chessqueen wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:56 am
dkappe wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:17 am
Chessqueen wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 1:15 am Ethereal is showing a great performance in Chess324, it is holding 3rd place after Dragon 3.1
If you check the version in the GUI, you’ll see 2964.00. Thats not Dragon 3.1.
I believe that Mr. Kaufman mentioned that he has a special version that play better at Chess324, so that could be version 2964.00
No, I have a special version that is better at giving handicaps. 2964 was just our latest dev. version, which we believe to be the best at standard chess, chess960, or chess324.
Komodo rules!
Chessqueen
Posts: 5685
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Re: Chess324

Post by Chessqueen »

lkaufman wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 3:30 am
Chessqueen wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:56 am
dkappe wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:17 am
Chessqueen wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 1:15 am Ethereal is showing a great performance in Chess324, it is holding 3rd place after Dragon 3.1
If you check the version in the GUI, you’ll see 2964.00. Thats not Dragon 3.1.
I believe that Mr. Kaufman mentioned that he has a special version that play better at Chess324, so that could be version 2964.00
No, I have a special version that is better at giving handicaps. 2964 was just our latest dev. version, which we believe to be the best at standard chess, chess960, or chess324.
What is wrong with Leela LCO , why it can NOT figure out Chess324 ? https://www.chess.com/computer-chess-championship
Jouni
Posts: 3621
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Full name: Jouni Uski

Re: Chess324

Post by Jouni »

According to Discord playing version is buggy!
Jouni
Chessqueen
Posts: 5685
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Re: Chess324

Post by Chessqueen »

Jouni wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 7:59 pm According to Discord playing version is buggy!
According to Plutie it was updated after game 154, but it is still playing horribly in Chess324 here is what he wrote
Current working theory - the bad performance so far would be because we submitted an untested branch which ended up having a pretty bad bug. whether that's actually why leela has performed so poorly remains to be seen, but it's the most probable explanation, considering the analysis I was running on the side during games with a known good version. - the playing Leela was updated to a fixed version around game 154.
Chessqueen
Posts: 5685
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Re: Chess324

Post by Chessqueen »

Chessqueen wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 8:12 pm
Jouni wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 7:59 pm According to Discord playing version is buggy!
According to Plutie it was updated after game 154, but it is still playing horribly in Chess324 here is what he wrote
Current working theory - the bad performance so far would be because we submitted an untested branch which ended up having a pretty bad bug. whether that's actually why leela has performed so poorly remains to be seen, but it's the most probable explanation, considering the analysis I was running on the side during games with a known good version. - the playing Leela was updated to a fixed version around game 154.
Great game by Berserk
[pgn][Event "Chess 324 Bonus (5|2)"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2022.09.05"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Berserk"]
[Black "Stockfish"]
[Result "1-0"]
[FEN "rnqnkbbr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RBBQKNNR w KQkq - 0 1"]
[GameStartTime "2022-09-05T19:39:58.408 PDT"]
[SetUp "1"]
[Termination "unterminated"]
[TimeControl "300+2"]

1. e4 f6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 Bxd5 4. Ne3 Bf7 5. c4 e6 6. Bd2 Qd7 7. Bc3 Na6 8. Ne2
Bg6 9. O-O c6 10. Bxg6+ hxg6 11. Qc2 f5 12. h3 Bd6 13. Rad1 O-O 14. Nc1 Qe7 15.
Rfe1 c5 16. Nb3 Rc8 17. dxc5 Nxc5 18. Nd5 Qh4 19. Nb4 a5 20. Rxd6 axb4 21. Nxc5
bxc3 22. Nxe6 Nxe6 23. Rdxe6 cxb2 24. Rxg6 Qd4 25. Rb1 Rxc4 26. Qxb2 Qxb2 27.
Rxb2 Rf7 28. Rg3 Kh7 29. a3 Rc6 30. Rf3 Ra6 31. Rb4 g6 32. a4 Kh6 33. g3 Rc7 34.
Rfb3 b6 35. Rd3 Rca7 36. Rdd4 Ra5 37. Kh2 Kg5 38. Kg1 R7a6 39. Rh4 Kf6 40. Rhc4
Kg5 41. Rh4 Kf6 42. Rhc4 Kg5 43. Rd4 Kh6 44. Kg2 Kg5 45. Rdc4 Kh6 46. Kh2 Kg5
47. Kg2 Kh6 48. Rd4 Kg5 49. h4+ Kh6 50. Kh3 Ra7 51. f3 R7a6 52. g4 fxg4+ 53.
fxg4 Ra7 54. Rxb6 Kh7 55. Rbb4 Rc5 56. Kg3 Rf7 57. Rb3 Ra7 58. g5 Rc1 59. Rdb4
Rcc7 60. Kf4 Re7 61. Ra3 Rf7+ 62. Ke3 Rf5 63. Rab3 Rff7 64. Kd3 Kg7 65. Kc3 Ra5
66. Kb2 Rf2+ 67. Ka3 Rf1 68. Rb8 Kf7 69. R3b7+ Ke6 70. Rb6+ Kd7 71. Rxg6 Rf4 72.
Rb4 Rf3+ 73. Kb2 Re5 74. Rb3 Rf2+ 75. Ka3 Kc7 76. Rc3+ Kb7 77. Rg7+ Kb6 78. Rgc7
Ka5 79. R7c5+ Rxc5 80. Rxc5+ Kb6 81. Rb5+ Kc7 82. g6 Rf3+ 83. Rb3 Rf1 84. g7
Ra1+ 85. Kb4 Rg1 86. g8=Q Rxg8 87. h5 Rg4+ 88. Ka5 Rh4 89. Rb5 Kc6 90. h6 Kd6
91. Rb4 Rh1 92. Ka6 Kc5 93. Rb6 Kc4 94. a5 Rh5 95. h7 Rxh7 96. Rc6+ Kd5 97. Kb6
Rh1 98. a6 Rb1+ 99. Kc7 Ra1 100. Kb7 Rb1+ 101. Rb6 Rf1 102. a7 Rf8 103. a8=Q
Rxa8 104. Kxa8 Kc5 105. Kb7 Kd5 106. Kc7 Kd4 107. Kc6 Kc4 108. Kd6 Kd4 109. Rb4+
Kc3 110. Re4 Kd2 111. Kc5 Kd3 112. Re5 Kc2 113. Kc4 Kd2 114. Re4 Kc2 115. Re2+ *[/pgn]
Plutie
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2022 6:14 am
Full name: Evan Engler

Re: Chess324

Post by Plutie »

Chessqueen wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 8:12 pm
Jouni wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 7:59 pm According to Discord playing version is buggy!
According to Plutie it was updated after game 154, but it is still playing horribly in Chess324 here is what he wrote
Current working theory - the bad performance so far would be because we submitted an untested branch which ended up having a pretty bad bug. whether that's actually why leela has performed so poorly remains to be seen, but it's the most probable explanation, considering the analysis I was running on the side during games with a known good version. - the playing Leela was updated to a fixed version around game 154.
for the record, that was a bit of a hasty statement - it's definitely still not fixed, but the update was for one bug that was found in the meantime. it's still possible to reproduce the issue with a few positions where leela blundered though.

this position is from game 166, leela went from an easily won position to a draw with 45.. Ng3. first image is from dag-bord-lf-se-2 - known working version, second is from dag-size, which was submitted.

Image
Image
dkappe
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
Full name: Dietrich Kappe

Re: Chess324

Post by dkappe »

The only decisive game against SF and Dragon that wasn’t inflicted by those two on each other was a win by Berserk against SF. A somewhat high exit, but still a win.

[pgn]
[Event "Chess 324 Bonus (5|2)"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2022.09.05"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Berserk"]
[Black "Stockfish"]
[Result "1-0"]
[FEN "rnqnkbbr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RBBQKNNR w KQkq - 0 1"]
[GameDuration "00:18:04"]
[GameEndTime "2022-09-05T19:58:02.863 PDT"]
[GameStartTime "2022-09-05T19:39:58.408 PDT"]
[PlyCount "239"]
[SetUp "1"]
[TimeControl "300+2"]

1. e4 f6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 Bxd5 4. Ne3 Bf7 5. c4 e6 6. Bd2 Qd7 7. Bc3 Na6 8. Ne2
Bg6 9. O-O c6 10. Bxg6+ hxg6 11. Qc2 f5 12. h3 Bd6 13. Rad1 O-O 14. Nc1 Qe7 15.
Rfe1 c5 16. Nb3 Rc8 17. dxc5 Nxc5 18. Nd5 Qh4 19. Nb4 a5 20. Rxd6 axb4 21. Nxc5
bxc3 22. Nxe6 Nxe6 23. Rdxe6 cxb2 24. Rxg6 Qd4 25. Rb1 Rxc4 26. Qxb2 Qxb2 27.
Rxb2 Rf7 28. Rg3 Kh7 29. a3 Rc6 30. Rf3 Ra6 31. Rb4 g6 32. a4 Kh6 33. g3 Rc7 34.
Rfb3 b6 35. Rd3 Rca7 36. Rdd4 Ra5 37. Kh2 Kg5 38. Kg1 R7a6 39. Rh4 Kf6 40. Rhc4
Kg5 41. Rh4 Kf6 42. Rhc4 Kg5 43. Rd4 Kh6 44. Kg2 Kg5 45. Rdc4 Kh6 46. Kh2 Kg5
47. Kg2 Kh6 48. Rd4 Kg5 49. h4+ Kh6 50. Kh3 Ra7 51. f3 R7a6 52. g4 fxg4+ 53.
fxg4 Ra7 54. Rxb6 Kh7 55. Rbb4 Rc5 56. Kg3 Rf7 57. Rb3 Ra7 58. g5 Rc1 59. Rdb4
Rcc7 60. Kf4 Re7 61. Ra3 Rf7+ 62. Ke3 Rf5 63. Rab3 Rff7 64. Kd3 Kg7 65. Kc3 Ra5
66. Kb2 Rf2+ 67. Ka3 Rf1 68. Rb8 Kf7 69. R3b7+ Ke6 70. Rb6+ Kd7 71. Rxg6 Rf4 72.
Rb4 Rf3+ 73. Kb2 Re5 74. Rb3 Rf2+ 75. Ka3 Kc7 76. Rc3+ Kb7 77. Rg7+ Kb6 78. Rgc7
Ka5 79. R7c5+ Rxc5 80. Rxc5+ Kb6 81. Rb5+ Kc7 82. g6 Rf3+ 83. Rb3 Rf1 84. g7
Ra1+ 85. Kb4 Rg1 86. g8=Q Rxg8 87. h5 Rg4+ 88. Ka5 Rh4 89. Rb5 Kc6 90. h6 Kd6
91. Rb4 Rh1 92. Ka6 Kc5 93. Rb6 Kc4 94. a5 Rh5 95. h7 Rxh7 96. Rc6+ Kd5 97. Kb6
Rh1 98. a6 Rb1+ 99. Kc7 Ra1 100. Kb7 Rb1+ 101. Rb6 Rf1 102. a7 Rf8 103. a8=Q
Rxa8 104. Kxa8 Kc5 105. Kb7 Kd5 106. Kc7 Kd4 107. Kc6 Kc4 108. Kd6 Kd4 109. Rb4+
Kc3 110. Re4 Kd2 111. Kc5 Kd3 112. Re5 Kc2 113. Kc4 Kd2 114. Re4 Kc2 115. Re2+
Kd1 116. Kd3 Kc1 117. Kc3 Kb1 118. Re1+ Ka2 119. Rc1 Ka3 120. Ra1# 1-0
[/pgn]
Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".
Lazy_Frank
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2018 10:56 pm
Location: Latvia
Full name: Raivis Baumanis

Re: Chess324

Post by Lazy_Frank »

Plutie wrote: Tue Sep 06, 2022 5:42 am
Chessqueen wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 8:12 pm
Jouni wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 7:59 pm According to Discord playing version is buggy!
According to Plutie it was updated after game 154, but it is still playing horribly in Chess324 here is what he wrote
Current working theory - the bad performance so far would be because we submitted an untested branch which ended up having a pretty bad bug. whether that's actually why leela has performed so poorly remains to be seen, but it's the most probable explanation, considering the analysis I was running on the side during games with a known good version. - the playing Leela was updated to a fixed version around game 154.
for the record, that was a bit of a hasty statement - it's definitely still not fixed, but the update was for one bug that was found in the meantime. it's still possible to reproduce the issue with a few positions where leela blundered though.

this position is from game 166, leela went from an easily won position to a draw with 45.. Ng3. first image is from dag-bord-lf-se-2 - known working version, second is from dag-size, which was submitted.

Image
Image
Even 52% vs 49% in some sense feels like fishy.