Wahoo (New) 1.0.0 + 0.1.1 by Andrew Hockman (also author of Apotheosis)
https://github.com/spamdrew128/Wahoo
Viridithas 10.0.0
https://github.com/cosmobobak/viridithas
New engine releases & news H1 2023
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 4718
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:42 am
- Location: France
- Full name: Philippe Chevalier
Re: New engine releases & news H1 2023
Zangdar 2.17.08
Windows and Linux binary available : https://github.com/Carbecq/Zangdar/rele ... g/v2.17.08
note : is it the right place to put this message ?
- better evaluation
- syzygy tables, but absolutely need a SSD to not loose on time
Windows and Linux binary available : https://github.com/Carbecq/Zangdar/rele ... g/v2.17.08
note : is it the right place to put this message ?
-
- Posts: 1458
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 7:43 am
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
- Full name: Gabor Szots
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:42 am
- Location: France
- Full name: Philippe Chevalier
Re: New engine releases & news H1 2023
Hi,
Thanks.
I have another question. I noticed that in CCRL/Blitz, its an old version of Zangdar that is used.
How is it done ? The testers choose which one ? Do I have something to do ?
Im certainly not critisize, its just genuine curiosity.
Thanks for your hard work
Philippe
Thanks.
I have another question. I noticed that in CCRL/Blitz, its an old version of Zangdar that is used.
How is it done ? The testers choose which one ? Do I have something to do ?
Im certainly not critisize, its just genuine curiosity.
Thanks for your hard work
Philippe
-
- Posts: 1458
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 7:43 am
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
- Full name: Gabor Szots
Re: New engine releases & news H1 2023
Hi Philippe,Carbec wrote: ↑Thu Jun 22, 2023 9:01 am Hi,
Thanks.
I have another question. I noticed that in CCRL/Blitz, its an old version of Zangdar that is used.
How is it done ? The testers choose which one ? Do I have something to do ?
Im certainly not critisize, its just genuine curiosity.
Thanks for your hard work
Philippe
I don't think 2.14.06 is that old. Yes I know there is a newer one but sometimes we skip versions for various reasons.
The testers may choose whatever engine or version they like. You don't have to do anything. You may indicate if you think a version is particularly worth testing then we will try not to skip it.
Gabor Szots
CCRL testing group
CCRL testing group
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:42 am
- Location: France
- Full name: Philippe Chevalier
Re: New engine releases & news H1 2023
Hi,
Thanks for the explanation.
I don't have any reason to ask for testing such or such version. I simply try to improve Zangdar. For the moment I wonder if the elo from CCRL is comparable to the human elo. Sometimes, when I look at my own games, they really don't look like a 2500 player would play !! Some moves are so strange. But is it ok to compare a human move and a engine move ?? perhaps not.
I any case, its really interesting.
Philippe
Thanks for the explanation.
I don't have any reason to ask for testing such or such version. I simply try to improve Zangdar. For the moment I wonder if the elo from CCRL is comparable to the human elo. Sometimes, when I look at my own games, they really don't look like a 2500 player would play !! Some moves are so strange. But is it ok to compare a human move and a engine move ?? perhaps not.
I any case, its really interesting.
Philippe
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:42 am
- Location: France
- Full name: Philippe Chevalier
Re: New engine releases & news H1 2023
Hi
Zangdar 2.17.09
Im very sorry , but I just corrected a bug. I hope it don't annoy you.
From my own tests, I gained about 20 elo.
I deleted the 2.17.08, as there is no reason to keep it.
Thanks all
Philippe
https://github.com/Carbecq/Zangdar/releases
Zangdar 2.17.09
Im very sorry , but I just corrected a bug. I hope it don't annoy you.
From my own tests, I gained about 20 elo.
I deleted the 2.17.08, as there is no reason to keep it.
Thanks all
Philippe
https://github.com/Carbecq/Zangdar/releases
-
- Posts: 1458
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 7:43 am
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
- Full name: Gabor Szots
Re: New engine releases & news H1 2023
In the last day you have relased and deleted 3 or maybe 4 versions. This certainly won't improve their chances to be tested. I have put 2.17.08 in my testing queue but now that you have deleted it and released 2.17.09 instead I am not so enthusiastic any more.
Gabor Szots
CCRL testing group
CCRL testing group
-
- Posts: 44680
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: New engine releases & news H1 2023
I'll test it soon. Good improvement by the sounds of it.Carbec wrote: ↑Thu Jun 22, 2023 4:08 pm Hi
Zangdar 2.17.09
Im very sorry , but I just corrected a bug. I hope it don't annoy you.
From my own tests, I gained about 20 elo.
I deleted the 2.17.08, as there is no reason to keep it.
Thanks all
Philippe
https://github.com/Carbecq/Zangdar/releases

gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:42 am
- Location: France
- Full name: Philippe Chevalier
Re: New engine releases & news H1 2023
hi,Gabor Szots wrote: ↑Thu Jun 22, 2023 4:11 pm In the last day you have relased and deleted 3 or maybe 4 versions. This certainly won't improve their chances to be tested. I have put 2.17.08 in my testing queue but now that you have deleted it and released 2.17.09 instead I am not so enthusiastic any more.
I am really sorry to hear that. Let me explain. I first made a new release 2.17.08, but I am not expert in github, I put the new sources after(. So I deleted it. I can't remember, but I had perhaps made another delete. Finally I made the right 2.17.08.
Then this morning I looked by chance at the quiescence routine, and thought about a modification. To my surprise, it gained about 20 elo. So I decided to made this new release.
ok, no matter what I find, I will stay with this release for some time.
I will wait to gain at least 100 points. but it is becoming more and more difficult. I am also trying to develop a tuner, but it is more complex that what I thought.
Philippe