INCOGNITO 8

[Eduard]

I want to make one thing clear. I'm not interested in names. I'm only interested in the content of the posts. If you want to troll, you can. If you want to embarrass yourself, you can. The readers aren't stupid.

I've been testing the networks with Dimension 3072 for a few months now, and no one else except me has presented any compilations with it in this forum. If it were up to people like Viren6 and a few other people, no one except the developers would have seen and tested such an engine.

To Viren6: If you don't have anything constructive, then leave this thread alone, we don't need your nonsense. You're so primitive. To the others: Thanks for your analyses!

Incognito 8 contains pure open source code. None of it is mine. The search code is identical to the latest corchess code. Only the both nets are newer and different in size to Corchess (uses D2560xD128). For changes see changes.txt.

[Viren]

I want to make one thing clear. I'm not interested in names. I'm only interested in the content of the posts. If you want to troll, you can. If you want to embarrass yourself, you can. The readers aren't stupid.

I've been testing the networks with Dimension 3072 for a few months now, and no one else except me has presented any compilations with it in this forum. If it were up to people like Viren6 and a few other people, no one except the developers would have seen and tested such an engine.

To Viren6: If you don't have anything constructive, then leave this thread alone, we don't need your nonsense. You're so primitive. To the others: Thanks for your analyses!

Incognito 8 contains pure open source code. None of it is mine. The search code is identical to the latest corchess code. Only the both nets are newer and different in size to Corchess (uses D2560xD128). For changes see changes.txt.

Isn't it interesting how every 'disaster' of Stockfish eventually makes it into your clone?

[Eduard]

This engine contains a better search code for analysis, the corchess code, which has been around for many years. And yes, I changed some parameters for the small network as I already described. This makes SF bettet for analysis. But I already said that. New is the small network with dinension 256. I don't know if this network is better but in my tests it was good with my parameters. What do you want now? Stop trolling, thanks.

[ImNotStockfish]

Best setting for normal analysis and playing: Random Op. MultiPV = 1 (default)
Best setting for normal tactical analysis: Random Op. MultiPV = 3 (changeable between 1 and 500)

Random Op. MultiPV is the exact same thing as MultiPV for analysis.
If you think a value of 3 gives you better "tactical analysis" then just increase MultiPV to 3 instead of adding another option.

Download Win 64-bit (avx2, bmi2, sse41, source code): https://pixeldrain.com/u/Hq4PHmKN

At least use Github.

[d]rnb4r/1ppp1kpp/1p4q1/3PQ3/3B4/1N3N2/PP3KPP/R4B1R w - - 0 17
#9

Code: Select all

The Huntsman 1 by the Stockfish developers (see AUTHORS file)
position fen rnb4r/1ppp1kpp/1p4q1/3PQ3/3B4/1N3N2/PP3KPP/R4B1R w - - 0 17
go mate 9
...
info depth 32 seldepth 22 multipv 1 score mate 9 nodes 24515926 nps 1446196 hashfull 1000 tbhits 0 time 16952 pv f3g5 f7f8 e5f4 f8g8 f1d3 g6e8 a1e1 e8f8 f4f8 g8f8 g5h7 f8f7 h7g5 f7f8 d3g6 b8c6 e1e8
bestmove f3g5 ponder f7f8

[Eduard]

Random Op. MultiPV is not identical to MPV. Some parameters can be changed, such as Plies. It is also possible to play games with it, which is not possible with the normal MPV. Some of my friends who have very powerful hardware play with it on servers.

[ImNotStockfish]

Random Op. MultiPV is not identical to MPV. Some parameters can be changed, such as Plies. It is also possible to play games with it, which is not possible with the normal MPV. Some of my friends who have very powerful hardware play with it on servers.

You are promoting it as a setting for "tactical analysis" and I said that it is identical for analysis, which is true.

[Eduard]

I didn't say that value 3 is a special code for tactical analysis. You can also use 2 or 5. I'm not a guru who dictates something to you. I'm just passing on my own experience, I use the value 3 and I don't use the normal MPV mode but the Random MPV mode.

[Draude]

Hi Eduard

Thank you for this new release! I'm happy to it brings new competition to other SF clones. Especially my COVERT-4 clone. If possible, can you take a look at the source code of my new engine and give me some pointers to improve?

Thank you.

[Eduard]

The next troll is here, apparently this thread is meant to be destroyed. Have fun, I'm closing this thread for myself now. Bye.

[chessica]

The next troll is here, apparently this thread is meant to be destroyed. Have fun, I'm closing this thread for myself now. Bye.

Who would you like to name as the next troll? Yes, tell me, aren't you surprised
that you are not liked everywhere because of the insults you spray?

Shame on you Eduard!!!