I can agree. I think the vector unit per CPU core is meant to stay, the mat-mul unit per server CPU core is meant to stay, and the NPU in end user CPU is meant to stay.
--
Srdja
Moderators: hgm, chrisw, Rebel
I can agree. I think the vector unit per CPU core is meant to stay, the mat-mul unit per server CPU core is meant to stay, and the NPU in end user CPU is meant to stay.
Would be great to see Lc0 nps comparison between the 4090 and the H100Ras wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2024 8:29 amWhich is why GPUs are not actually used for that.
"By tradition, Nvidia still calls the H100 a graphics processing unit, but the term is clearly on its last legs: just two out of the 50+ texture processing clusters (TPCs) in the device are actually cable of running vertex, geometry, and pixel shader maths required to render 3D graphics."
https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/dat ... it-matters
If you compare the performance, you'll notice that the H100 rocks in FP16, relevant for AI, while the 4090 beats the H100 in FP32, used for gaming. The FP64 is interesting as well, used e.g. for scientific high precision simulations, where the H100 leaves the 4090 in the dust. Also, the H100 doesn't even support DirectX11/12. Performance in TFLOPS.
4090: FP16: 82.58, FP32: 82.58, FP64: 1.29.
H100: FP16: 248.3, FP32: 62.08, FP64: 31.04.
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/g ... 4090.c3889
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/h ... 6-gb.c4164
AMD's server Zen 5 "Turin" is already on TSMC 3nm:
And uses 16x8-cores resp. 12x16-cores chiplets with one IO-die and 12 memory channels:
But bringing Arm into the PC world is a different story—something that has had mixed success. Without an x86 license, Nvidia could have a significant hurdle to clear to make its CPUs fully compatible with the existing PC game library.
AMD says RDNA 4 GPUs are coming in early 2025 — RX 8000 will deliver ray tracing improvements, AI capabilitiesAccording to DigiTimes, Nvidia could announce its PC CPUs as early as September 2025, with a full launch potentially following in March 2026. Much depends on whether the outfit can get games to work on the thing.
We can probably expect the RTX 50-series to still be at least partially revealed at CES 2025 — CEO Jensen is on tap for the keynote, after all. Will that be an official launch, or an announcement of an upcoming launch like last year's 40-series Super cards? Our money would be on the latter, meaning a late January release.
--In the meantime, there's no reason for Nvidia to rush things. It already dominates the GPU market and continues to sell GPUs. The RTX 4090 remains a prime example of this, an extremely expensive card that has recently increased in price due to diminishing supply coupled with a still-high demand from AI customers and perhaps even a few remaining 'normal' consumers.
smatovic wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2024 11:05 am Nvidia is building a CPU
https://fudzilla.com/news/60039-nvidia- ... ding-a-cpu
...seems like a logical next step, they already have the Grace CPU for AI running...
But bringing Arm into the PC world is a different story—something that has had mixed success. Without an x86 license, Nvidia could have a significant hurdle to clear to make its CPUs fully compatible with the existing PC game library.According to DigiTimes, Nvidia could announce its PC CPUs as early as September 2025, with a full launch potentially following in March 2026. Much depends on whether the outfit can get games to work on the thing.